RELEASED 2026.02REASSESSED 2026.09.15Compare

Worx

Worx Landroid Vision Cloud WR320

Name: Worx Landroid Vision Cloud WR320
Brand: Worx

The WR320 eliminates the perimeter wire entirely, trading boundary labor for RTK accuracy and satellite dependency. A mower for owners willing to rely on continuous satellite coverage and accept AI-camera privacy trade-offs.

ReplacesWorx Landroid L 20V WR155,Worx Landroid M 20V,Worx Landroid Vision L1600

Autonomy Ladder

Why Level IV.

One five-rung scale, every category, from acting only on command to working unsupervised anywhere.

VGeneralized AutonomyAny task, any setting. No consumer robot has reached it.
To reach Level VWorks across task types and environments it was never configured for.
IVEnvironmental AutonomyThis robot

Worx Landroid Vision Cloud WR320 sees ordinary obstacles before contact, copes without the space being cleared, and frees itself when stuck.

Navigation and control

RTK satellite positioning + AI-camera obstacle detection + virtual geofencing
Why this level
- Worx documents AI-camera obstacle detection with stereo-camera vision and cloud RTK corrections, mowing an app-drawn boundary on schedule with no wire, up to half an acre and a 30 percent grade.
- Reviews of the WR310 and WR340 do not state that they share the WR320's navigation.
Autonomy dimension 83 / 100 · 2 sources reviewed
IIIConditional AutonomyFinishes whole jobs in familiar spaces; struggles at the edges.
IIAssisted AutonomyRuns preset routines; stalls at anything new.
IManual AutomationOne action on command; no independent operation.

How we assign a level →

Human Readiness

Ready Now.

One question: what does buying this robot today walk you into? The state is computed from the record, and recomputed daily.

Ready NowThis robot

Worx Landroid Vision Cloud WR320 is on sale, assessed, and nothing on its record argues for waiting.
How this was derived
- Shipping past the first-90-day ownership window with a published assessment, no documented issues on record, and no announced successor.
Notes on the record
- Shipping at MSRP via Worx direct and retailers.
- RTK + AI-camera wire-free mowing is production-ready; no perimeter wire installation required.
- Manufacturer specs document centimeter-accuracy satellite positioning; setup complexity is dock placement + yard mapping via app.
On the record
- Shipping since February 2026 · 7 months on the market
- Retail listings on file: Amazon
- No successor announced
- 2 sources reviewed
What would move it
A documented problem, an announced successor, or a withdrawn listing moves it out; the rating recomputes daily.
New to MarketOn sale under 90 days; the ownership record is still forming.
WaitA successor is announced and has not shipped; re-read the decision when it arrives.
Known IssuesDocumented problems stand on the record; read the case before buying.

How we assess readiness →

Robovations Score

How this number was reached

66of 100

CapableAt or above 45% of the 436 robots we scoreand 32% of the 109 scored robot lawn mowers

DeficientLimitedCapableStrongExemplary

Measured on 8 of the 9 inputs16% not counted

Our assessment did not establish an independent source for field failure rate on this machine, so that input is left out of the score rather than guessed at, and the rest re-weighted to fill the space. A gap in what we have been able to verify is not evidence against the robot. Where a whole pillar has nothing measured, we publish no number at all.

What moved itpoints gained or lost against a typical robot

Carried by

Support longevity73+1.1
Consumables80+0.9

Held back by

Task completion64−1.3
Operating envelope50−0.7

Capability40% of the score61What it does without you.

Task completion16% of the score64

Evidence

Mows a half acre on schedule inside an app-drawn virtual boundary without intervention, docking and recharging across the multiple cycles a 60 to 75 minute charge forces. Held down by two documented human steps and one excursion: blade clogging in clumped turf needs manual cleaning weekly through wet seasons, the boundary map is reviewed and updated every three to six months after landscaping changes, and owners describe drift into unmapped areas during satellite outages under tree cover.

Coverage and navigation10% of the score70

Evidence

Systematic and retained in principle, since a virtual geofence is stored in the app and held by corrected positioning, with a manual reset when landscaping changes, which is the retained anchor's shape. It lands well below that anchor because the retention is conditional on a signal: the record schedules an RTK signal-strength survey across the yard, an annual spring recalibration, and documents drift into unmapped areas when corrections drop. Credit here is for the coverage plan, not for centimeter accuracy.

Edge-case recovery10% of the score50

Evidence

The signal-loss behavior is the strongest thing in this record and it answers the referent's question directly: on a dropped fix the mower falls back to GPS with camera positioning at reduced accuracy, and where loss persists it navigates toward the dock on visual landmarks. That is position recovery and a safe return. Held below the upper anchors because the same record says it drifts into unmapped areas before that happens under dense canopy, and nothing documents freeing itself from entrapment.

Operating envelope4% of the score50

Evidence

Two hard preconditions rather than soft ones: a clear view of the sky for satellite corrections, with dense canopy degrading the fix, and Worx cloud connectivity for those corrections to arrive at all. Rated to half an acre and a 30 percent grade, with the motor housing waterproofed for wet work, but wet grass costs traction above a 15 percent slope and wet clay or loose soil costs it below the rating too.

Dependability40% of the score68Whether it keeps doing it.

Field failure ratenot countedno source verified48

Evidence

A thin evidence position. Released 1 February 2026, so six months of field record, and the sources block contains only Worx documentation and our own dated log, with no owner-report source and no press-review source at all. The negative findings in the record, drift under canopy, wheel slip, blade clogging, are attributed to owners in prose but substantiated nowhere, and the RTK architecture is new enough that the three-season Vision platform record does not govern it.

Software stability14% of the score65

Evidence

The ordinary consumer-robot case, inherited from the platform rather than shown for this model. Worx ships Landroid firmware and the Vision line has a multi-year update trail, so updates reach the machine, and no regression pattern is reported. This model is six months old with no firmware source of its own, so there is no independent record of update behavior. Silence in both directions.

Support longevity10% of the score73

Evidence

The parts side is sound: a large manufacturer, broad retail, and blade assemblies openly priced at $40 to $60 a set on an annual cadence. The risk this machine carries and its siblings do not is that the headline capability is a service, since RTK corrections depend on Worx cloud connectivity, and no support-window commitment is published for it. A retired correction service leaves a mower that falls back to positioning the record itself calls less precise.

Ownership burden20% of the score70What it asks of you.

Routine maintenance12% of the score64

Evidence

The longest routine among the mowers here despite docked operation. Weekly means inspecting the blade for grass clumping, with manual blade cleaning through wet seasons when turf clumps, plus dock contacts. Monthly adds wheel treads and cleaning two separate sensing surfaces, the camera lens and the RTK antenna. Every three to six months the boundary map is reviewed and RTK signal strength is tested across the yard, and spring restart includes recalibrating the positioning.

Consumables8% of the score80

Evidence

One scheduled item on a slow cadence and it is priced: a blade assembly of two at $40 to $60, replaced annually or after 50 mowing sessions. No perimeter wire to repair and no subscription is documented for the cloud corrections that the positioning depends on. Held out of the top because no battery replacement price or expected life appears anywhere in the record.

middle half of the databaseits medianthis robot

Reported, not scoredneither measures how well the robot works

Five-year cost$1,450

the cheapest RTK machine here at $1,199.99 list, plus roughly $250 over five years in annual blade assemblies at $40 to $60; no subscription is documented, though the RTK corrections the boundary depends on arrive through Worx cloud connectivity, so the running cost assumes that service stays free

Data postureCloud-linked

Account required. Maps and telemetry leave the home; core function survives an outage.

What leaves the homeNot documented

Read the full methodology →

FIT CHECK

Will the Worx Landroid Vision Cloud WR320 work on your yard?

Describe your yard using the controls. Each choice reads the spec sheet for you, flagging where the Worx Landroid Vision Cloud WR320 is built for your space and where it isn’t.

Yard size

Terrain

Grass type

Boundary setup

See every robot mower suited to these conditions

A classification of fit for the conditions you set, not a recommendation. Verdicts describe engineering design intent, not test results.

OWNERSHIP

Living with it.

New product; RTK plus camera integration proven on test fleet.

Unprovenowner-reported arc

The record so far

Worx has shipped RTK-based Landroid models for three years; the Vision Cloud adds AI-camera obstacle detection. Manufacturer testing confirms centimeter-accuracy positioning and camera-based object detection on demo units. Field owner-report cadence pending wider retail availability.

What goes wrongnot yet documented independently

The independent record is still forming. Failure modes are listed once an outside source reports them.

Upkeep routine

Weekly52×/yr

Inspect for grass clumping or damage; clean dock charging contacts if wet storage is used.

Monthly12×/yr

Check wheel treads for debris; clean sensors (, RTK antenna) for dust or pollen buildup.

Seasonal4×/yr

Review and update yard boundary mapping in app if landscaping changes; test RTK signal strength across the yard.

Before winter storage, drain water from motor housing, clean , and store mower indoors in a dry location. Before spring use, recharge dock and recalibrate RTK positioning.

Yearly1×/yr

Replace assembly (~$40-60 per set of two blades) after 50 mowing sessions or winter storage; inspect charging dock for corrosion and clean contacts.

Cost over timeabout $240 past the sticker over three years

PurchaseRunning cost

Year 1

$1,279

Year 3

$1,439

Year 5

$1,599

$1,199 to buy, then about $80 a year for the replaceable parts below. Over three years that is roughly $240 past the sticker price. Excludes electricity and any repairs.

What you replace

Annually$40–60

Replacement cadence from the maintenance schedule; prices shown where the source documents them. Part links may earn a commission and do not influence the classification. All parts at Worx

Safety notes2 notes

On-board camera streams images to Worx cloud for model training. No local-only mode.
RTK signal dependencyMower requires continuous satellite RTK access; dense canopy impairs accuracy.

SPECIFICATION

The full spec sheet.

Priced below the category median, with every figure charted against the category below.

Dimensional drawing

Key specificationsManufacturer-published

FootprintThe width, depth and height of the robot itself, without its dock.: 20.9 × 24.2 in · 11.1 in tall✓
WeightThe robot alone, without its dock, as the maker states it.: 31 lbs✓
Wi-FiThe bands the robot can join; many models need a 2.4 GHz network to set up.: Supported✓
Cutting width: 8.7 in✓
Cutting height range: 1.6-3.5 in✓
Max area: 21,800 sq ft✓
Max slope: 30%✓
Blade system: 3 blades✓
Boundary method: RTK Cloud with V-SLAM, no boundary wire✓
Drive layout: Two-wheel drive✓

Where it lands · ranked across 128 robot lawn mowersThis robotMedianTypical range

RuntimeThe maker's stated running time on one charge, at a standard setting.75min

30 min240 min

Near median

PriceThe maker's list price, not a price found in a shop.$1,199.99

$549$5,999

Below median

Charge timeTime from empty to full on the dock, as the maker states it.100min

30 min300 min

Near median

WeightThe robot alone, without its dock, as the maker states it.31lbs

13 lbs134 lbs

Near median

Position shows where the figure sits across the tracked category, not a quality judgment.

Official referencesProduct page

RECORD

How the assessment has moved.

Every announcement, release and reassessment behind the current classification.

Coming soon

Just launched

Active updates

Settled

Discontinued

Sep 2026 · AssessmentAutonomy Ladder reclassified IV → III
Sep 2026 · AssessmentRobovations Score revised 62 → 66
Sep 2026 · AssessmentRecord status: Provisional → Pending
Aug 2026 · AssessmentRecord status: Verified → Provisional
Aug 2026 · AssessmentRobovations Score rescored under v4.2: 66 → 62
Jul 2026 · AssessmentRobovations Score recorded at 66 of 100
Apr 2026 · UpdateOwner reports confirm satellite positioning limitations
Feb 2026 · ReleaseReaches commercial retail in North America

Show 1 earlier entryHide earlier entry

Jan 2025 · AnnouncementUnveiled at CES 2025 Las Vegas

Editorial comparisons

How Worx Landroid Vision Cloud WR320 compares.

All comparisons →

Goal-based

Robot Lawn Mowers4 robots

Mammotion, Ecovacs, and Worx Wire-Free Mowers: What Fits?

Four robot lawn mowers now classify at Autonomy Ladder Level IV without a buried wire: the Mammotion YUKA mini 2 1000H, Ecovacs Goat O1000 LiDAR PRO, and Worx Landroid Vision…

vs Mammotion YUKA mini 2 1000H · Ecovacs Goat O1000 LiDAR PRO · Worx Landroid Vision Cloud WR310

Expectation vs. Reality

Robot Lawn Mowers4 robots

Do robot mowers actually avoid kids and pets?

Four robot mowers marketed as family-yard-ready use three distinct avoidance architectures. This comparison tests whether each platform’s claims about obstacle detection translate to documented behavior around low, fast-moving subjects like…

vs Segway Navimow H2 · Ecovacs Goat A3000 LiDAR PRO · Husqvarna Automower 115H

Common questions

What people actually ask.

5 answered

OperationDoes the Worx Landroid Vision Cloud WR320 require a buried perimeter wire?

No. The WR320 uses satellite RTK positioning (centimeter-accuracy) and virtual geofencing via the app. Manufacturer documentation confirms wire-free operation. Setup involves dock placement and mapping the yard boundary in the app, not physical burial.

OperationWhat happens to the WR320 if RTK satellite signal drops during mowing?

Worx specs document fallback to GPS + camera-based positioning, with reduced accuracy. If signal loss persists, the mower navigates toward the dock via visual landmarks. Owner reports describe occasional drift into unmapped areas during satellite outages in dense tree cover.

OperationCan the Worx WR320 handle wet grass or morning dew?

Manufacturer specs confirm waterproof motor housing and blade design for wet conditions. Owner reports note that wet grass increases wheel-slip on slopes above 15%; blade clogging in clumped turf requires manual cleaning weekly during wet seasons.

OwnershipHow often does the WR320 need blade replacement, and what is the cost?

Worx recommends blade swap annually or after 50 mowing sessions. Replacement blade assemblies cost approximately $40-60 per set. Seasonal storage requires blade inspection and winter corrosion prevention.

OperationWhat data does the Worx Landroid Vision Cloud WR320 collect, and can it be disabled?

The on-board camera streams obstacle imagery to Worx cloud for AI model training. Mower position, charge cycles, and yard boundary data are logged server-side. No local-only or image opt-out mode exists.

Availability

Where it's sold

We may earn commission from qualifying purchases. This does not influence classification.

Amazon Check price & availability

Cite & Embed

Reference the Worx Landroid Vision Cloud WR320 classification.

Embed the Autonomy Ladder™ mark or copy the citation. The mark is served from this record, so a reassessment updates it on your page automatically.

Get the embed code and citation

124161

268112

Clear space 3222 on all sides

Embed code

Scale proportionally only, up to 2× (536px wide)(224px wide). No recolouring, cropping, rotating, or re-typesetting.

Citation

Robovations. "Worx Landroid Vision Cloud WR320: Autonomy Level IV (Environmental Autonomy)." Autonomy Ladder™, assessed September 2026. https://robovations.com/robots/worx-landroid-vision-cloud-wr320/

Link it. The mark must point at this record. An unlinked mark is not authorised.
Hot-link it. Never download, self-host, or re-upload the image. A saved copy stops updating, and a mark that has stopped updating is a claim we no longer stand behind.
A classification, not an endorsement. It may not appear beside language implying Robovations recommends, rates, or approves the product.

Where to next

Three ways to keep going.

For evaluators

Compare with a peer.

See the Worx Landroid Vision Cloud WR320 and MOVA LiDAX Pro 800 side by side: autonomy level, Robovations Score, readiness, and price. Classification, not a verdict.

See the full comparison

Or compare with ANTHBOT N8 LiDAR, Husqvarna Automower Aspire R6V, Husqvarna Automower 312V.

For browsers

See every Level IV.

Every robot we’ve classified at environmental autonomy. Sorted by readiness, score, and price. Filter by category, manufacturer, or release date.

Browse the database

Updated weekly with new entries and reclassifications.

Worx Landroid Vision Cloud WR320

Will the Worx Landroid Vision Cloud WR320 work on your yard?

Living with it.

The full spec sheet.

How the assessment has moved.

How Worx Landroid Vision Cloud WR320 compares.

Mammotion, Ecovacs, and Worx Wire-Free Mowers: What Fits?

Do robot mowers actually avoid kids and pets?

What people actually ask.