Goal-based/Robot Lawn Mowers/4 robots compared/Reviewed Aug 2026
Mammotion, Ecovacs, and Worx Wire-Free Mowers: What Fits?
View recordWorxIVLandroid Vision Cloud WR310Requires live network for positioningYes (cloud RTK)$1,199.99
Full specifications21 measurements · 67 of 84 documented
What replaces the perimeter wire on each mower?
None of the four bury a boundary wire. Each substitutes a different sensing stack, and only two need a live network connection to stay positioned.
YUKA mini 2 1000H
Ecovacs Goat O1000 LiDAR PRO
Worx Landroid Vision Cloud WR310
Worx Landroid Vision Cloud WR320Mammotion documents 360-degree LiDAR with a 60-meter range and dual-camera vision as the entire positioning stack, with no RTK or base station anywhere in the design.
Ecovacs specifies a rotating 360-degree LiDAR fused with a 3D time-of-flight LiDAR and an AI camera, calling boundary detection automatic with no wire and no mapping drive.
Worx documents camera V-SLAM as the fallback for both Vision Cloud models, but only the WR320 record adds a described return-to-dock behavior when signal loss persists.
How much yard does each one cover?
Rated coverage, cutting width, and per-charge runtime differ across all four models, even where the underlying navigation approach is shared between two of them.
YUKA mini 2 1000HEcovacs Goat O1000 LiDAR PROWorx Landroid Vision Cloud WR310Worx Landroid Vision Cloud WR320Mammotion rates the 1000H for 1,000 square meters, about 0.25 acre, at roughly 2,690 square feet per charge, with a 45 percent, 24-degree slope limit on rear-wheel drive.
Ecovacs splits its slope rating: 45 percent in the mowed work area but only 17 percent at a virtual boundary, a bifurcation not published on the other three models.
The WR320 is rated to half an acre against the WR310's quarter acre; Worx documents cutting width and slope rating as identical between the two models.
How does the Worx WR310 differ from the WR320?
The two Worx models share a product line and a navigation stack; Worx's own documentation names one difference between them.
YUKA mini 2 1000HEcovacs Goat O1000 LiDAR PROWorx Landroid Vision Cloud WR310Worx Landroid Vision Cloud WR320Worx's own FAQ for the WR310 states the navigation stack, cutting width, and slope rating are identical to the WR320, with rated lawn size named as the difference.
The WR320 lists at $1,799.99 against the WR310's $1,199.99, a roughly $600 premium that tracks its half-acre coverage rating against the WR310's quarter acre.
Worx publishes a 4Ah battery for the WR310 against a 5Ah battery for the WR320, alongside documented charge times of 80 minutes and 100 minutes respectively.
How much independent evidence backs each machine?
Each mower has been on the market under seven months, but the depth of independent evidence behind each one is not the same.
YUKA mini 2 1000HEcovacs Goat O1000 LiDAR PROWorx Landroid Vision Cloud WR310Worx Landroid Vision Cloud WR320Robovations' own assessment record for the O1000 LiDAR PRO carries no readiness classification and excludes edge recovery, failure rate, and software stability from its composite for lack of independent sourcing.
The WR320 record is the only one of the four carrying a Robovations tracker log, an ongoing monitoring record none of the other three currently have.
Independent test coverage exists for the WR310 from named outlets; the O1000 LiDAR PRO's outside coverage is comparative testing across the wider GOAT line rather than a dedicated review, and the Mammotion and WR320 records name no independent test at all.
What does routine upkeep involve on each?
Blade service is the shared baseline across all four, but only one design adds a second consumable channel for its integrated edge trimmer.
YUKA mini 2 1000HEcovacs Goat O1000 LiDAR PROWorx Landroid Vision Cloud WR310Worx Landroid Vision Cloud WR320Mammotion's deck carries five pivoting blades, each with a second mounting hole so a set is flipped once before the whole set is replaced, roughly doubling service life per set.
Ecovacs is the only model here with an edge trimmer built into the deck; the TruEdge line and brush are separate consumables from the mowing blades, priced at $15.99 and $29.99 on the Ecovacs US shop.
Worx documents blade replacement on a 1-2 month cycle for the WR310 and an annual or 50-session cycle for the WR320, with no separate trimmer consumable on either model.
In closing
What the evidence shows
Patterns that emerged across the questions above.
Wire-free navigation splits into two approaches
Two models position entirely from onboard LiDAR and vision with no cloud dependency; the other two use camera-assisted RTK corrections delivered over a network connection.
Evidence maturity varies more than the hardware
The O1000 LiDAR PRO withholds three of nine composite scoring inputs and carries no readiness classification, while the WR310 has dedicated independent test coverage the other three lack.
Coverage tier, not hardware, separates the Worx pair
The WR310 and WR320 share navigation, cutting width, and slope rating by Worx's own account; the documented difference is rated coverage area, a quarter acre against half an acre.
Common questions