Skip to content
Robovations
Robovations™
Robot Autonomy, Classified
Saved
Comparison · 2 robots

Wybot C2 · Worx Landroid Vision Cloud WR320

These robots are in different classes, so there is no honest shared scale for their specifications. Each is plotted against its own class instead, and the axis says so.

  1. Wybot C2
  2. Worx Landroid Vision Cloud WR320
Wybot

Wybot C2

Autonomy
II Assisted Autonomy
Score
54/100 Limited
Readiness
Ready Now
Price
$699.99list

Up to three

01 Classification

What each one does on its own.

The Autonomy Ladder is the same five rungs for every robot on the site. A rung describes the conditions a robot handles without you, not how good it is.

V
Generalized
Any task, any setting
IV
Environmental
Handles new obstacles without help
Worx Landroid Vision Cloud WR320
III
Conditional
Finishes familiar jobs on its own
II
Assisted
Runs preset routines, needs rescue
Wybot C2
I
Manual
One action, on command
02 Assessment

Where they actually differ.

The Robovations Score is nine inputs across three pillars, each weighted as shown and each scored so that more is better. A robot can lead on one and trail on another, which is the point of showing them apart. Cost of ownership and data handling are reported on each robot's own page and are never averaged into the score.

Capability

Task completion16% of score
Does it finish the job it is sold to do, unattended
  • Wybot C272
  • Worx Landroid Vision Cloud WR32064
18median 72 across 354 scored robots100
Coverage and navigation10% of score
Does it work the whole area, and hold that between runs
  • Wybot C255
  • Worx Landroid Vision Cloud WR32070
15median 70 across 344 scored robots100
Edge-case recovery10% of score
Does it recover from the failures its category presents
  • Wybot C20
  • Worx Landroid Vision Cloud WR32050
18median 50 across 261 scored robots100
Operating envelope4% of score
How far conditions can vary before performance drops
  • Wybot C262
  • Worx Landroid Vision Cloud WR32050
25median 70 across 320 scored robots100

Dependability

Field failure rate16% of score
Documented hardware failures per owner-year
  • Wybot C260
  • Worx Landroid Vision Cloud WR32048
6median 70 across 344 scored robots100
Software stability14% of score
Whether updates fix more than they break
  • Wybot C245
  • Worx Landroid Vision Cloud WR32065
15median 65 across 275 scored robots100
Support longevity10% of score
Committed parts, service and updates, with dates
  • Wybot C20
  • Worx Landroid Vision Cloud WR32073
0median 63 across 354 scored robots100

Ownership burden

Routine maintenance12% of score
Hands-on time it asks for in normal operation
  • Wybot C255
  • Worx Landroid Vision Cloud WR32064
22median 68 across 355 scored robots100
Consumables8% of score
Parts that must be bought to keep it working
  • Wybot C268
  • Worx Landroid Vision Cloud WR32080
30median 69 across 354 scored robots100
03 Measured against the class

Each against its own class.

Different classes have different scales, so each robot is placed by where it sits among its own kind. The midpoint is that class’s median.

Priceposition within own class
  • Wybot C2$699.99 (17th pct)
  • Worx Landroid Vision Cloud WR320$1,022.54 (19th pct)
lowest in classmedianhighest in class

Not compared, because fewer than two of these robots carry a published figure: Suction, Runtime, Charge time, Noise, Weight, Height.

04 Ownership

What the numbers leave out.

The trade-off

What each design gives up to be good at what it is good at.

Wybot C2

Not recorded for this robot.

Worx Landroid Vision Cloud WR320

Satellite-dependent autonomy: RTK precision eliminates wire-burial labor but introduces cloud and GPS failure modes not present in wire-guided systems.

AI-camera privacy cost: obstacle detection uses on-board imaging streamed to Worx cloud for model training; no local-only or opt-out mode.

Who each one is wrong for

Stated by the record itself. A robot being wrong for a household is a fact about fit, not a fault.

Wybot C2

Not recorded for this robot.

Worx Landroid Vision Cloud WR320
Yards over 1/2 acre
The WR320.1 is rated to half an acre. That is a lawn-size ceiling rather than a per-charge figure, so extra docking cycles do not extend it; Worx sells a one-acre Landroid Vision Cloud for larger lots.
Owners rejecting AI-camera surveillance
The WR320's obstacle avoidance relies on an on-board camera that processes imagery to the Worx cloud for AI training. Privacy policy permits image retention for model improvement. No local-only operation mode.
Terrain steeper than a 30 percent grade
Worx rates this model to 30 percent, about 17 degrees. Ground steeper than that sits outside the rating, and wet clay or loose soil can cost traction on grades below it as well.
Owners preferring predictable boundary control
Virtual boundaries rely on satellite corrections. When those drop, the mower falls back on camera V-SLAM fused with inertial data and odometry, which holds position less precisely than a corrected fix. A perimeter wire is a physical line the owner places and can see.

What stays your job

The upkeep ownership hands back to you, whatever the autonomy level says.

Wybot C2

Not recorded for this robot.

Worx Landroid Vision Cloud WR320
  • Weekly: Inspect blade for grass clumping or damage; clean dock charging contacts if wet storage is used.
  • Monthly: Check wheel treads for debris; clean sensors (camera lens, RTK antenna) for dust or pollen buildup.
  • Every 3-6 months: Review and update yard boundary mapping in app if landscaping changes; test RTK signal strength across the yard.
  • Annually: Replace blade assembly (~$40-60 per set of two blades) after 50 mowing sessions or winter storage; inspect charging dock for corrosion and clean contacts.
  • Seasonally: Before winter storage, drain water from motor housing, clean blades, and store mower indoors in a dry location. Before spring use, recharge dock and recalibrate RTK positioning.
05 Evidence

How much each of these is standing on.

Classifications rest on different depths of evidence. A pre-release assessment and a verified one are not the same kind of claim.

Evidence behind each classification
Robot Evidence status Sources reviewed Last assessed
Wybot C2 Provisional 1 Aug 2026
Worx Landroid Vision Cloud WR320 Provisional 4 Aug 2026

Robovations classifies robots; it does not rank them. Nothing on this page is a recommendation, and no manufacturer influences a classification or its placement here.