
Wybot
Wybot C2
- Autonomy
- IIAssisted
- Score
- 59/100Capable
- Readiness
- Ready Now
- Price
- $699.99list

Wybot

Wybot
Up to three
All robot pool cleaners. Every figure below is placed against the whole class, so a gap can be read against how much the class itself varies.
The conditions each robot was assessed against, side by side. Rows marked in gold are where these machines genuinely differ.
| Condition | Wybot C2 | Wybot C1 |
|---|---|---|
| Pool type | ||
| In-ground | GoodWybot designs and rates the C2 specifically for in-ground pools up to 2,152 sq ft; this matches its documented target use. | GoodIn-ground pools with vinyl or fiberglass walls are ideal. Wall height and slope accommodate magnetic adhesion design. |
| Above-groundthey differ | DependsWybot documents this model for in-ground pools only; no above-ground rating or compatibility statement was found in the sources reviewed. | PoorMagnetic adhesion fails on inflatable and panel-wall above-ground designs. Unsuitable. |
| Mixed setup | DependsWith no above-ground rating documented, a mixed setup only has confirmed coverage for the in-ground portion of the pool. | DependsIn-ground vinyl and fiberglass only; skip above-ground pools due to adhesion failure. |
| Pool size | ||
| Small (< 400 sqft) | GoodWell inside the 2,152 sq ft rated coverage; a full cycle at up to 180 minutes has ample margin for this size. | GoodWell-suited to 10,000-15,000 gallon in-ground pools with single wall runs. |
| Medium (400 – 800) | GoodComfortably within the 2,152 sq ft rated area, with the 180-minute Eco-mode runtime enough for a complete cycle. | Good15,000-25,000 gallon target range where wall coverage and runtime balance. |
| Large (> 800) | DependsWybot's rating tops out at 2,152 sq ft; pools well above that may exceed a single 180-minute cycle's coverage. | DependsLarge pools require 2-3 daily cycles to cover all walls; runtime limits multi-day coverage. |
| Debris load | ||
| Fine (sand / silt) | GoodIndependent testing found the ultra-fine 10-micron filter stage makes a noticeable difference on fine sediment compared to a single 180-micron basket. | GoodFine particles (pollen, dust) not actively cleaned; floor focus is minimal. |
| Leaves / large debris | GoodNo leaves-specific test was documented for the C2; the 180-micron primary stage should catch larger debris, but this was not verified independently. | GoodFloating leaves bypass wall-climbing robot; leaves at waterline are captured by brush. |
| Algae / heavy fouling | GoodIndependent testing specifically credits the dual-layer filtration with a noticeable difference on light algae, beyond what a single-stage filter catches. | GoodBrush technology effectively addresses algae film on walls and waterline; core strength. |
| Coverage you want | ||
| Floor only | GoodEven without mapping, independent full-cycle testing found the C2 covers a pool thoroughly on the basic floor-cleaning modes. | GoodC1 focuses entirely on walls and waterline; floor cleaning is minimal. Pair with floor robot. |
| Floor + wallsthey differ | DependsWall coverage is one of seven preset modes, not an adaptive route, so the owner must choose the right one. | GoodWall and waterline coverage is the C1 primary function. Floor coverage requires separate unit. |
| Floor + walls + waterlinethey differ | DependsFull floor, wall and waterline coverage means choosing the right preset mode; there is no camera to plan it. | GoodWaterline brush reaches surface; wall coverage is strong. Floor cleaning not included. |
A robot being poor for a condition is a fact about fit, not a fault. “Depends” means the record names a limit worth reading, not that the answer is unknown.
Nine inputs across three pillars, each weighted as shown and each scored so more is better. A robot can lead on one and trail on another, which is the point of showing them apart.
A number only means something next to the spread it sits in. Each track is the real range across every classified robot in the class, with the median marked.
Not compared, because fewer than two of these robots carry a published figure: Noise, Height.
Written on each record, and the only thing here every robot on the site carries.
What each design gives up to be good at what it is good at.
No camera, no mapping: seven preset modes replace a perception system, so coverage quality tracks the mode the owner selects, not the robot’s own judgment.
The added 10-micron filter stage catches finer sediment than a single-basket cleaner, but a three-hour charge against a three-hour runtime still caps use at one cycle per half day.
At 17.6 lb wet, the machine that documents step and slope coverage is also the one an owner has to physically lift out every time.
Skipping the AI camera keeps the price roughly $200 below the C2 Vision, and gives up debris-adaptive path planning to do it.
Cordless operation removes the cable and swivel of a tethered cleaner at the cost of a bounded battery cycle: the machine runs up to 150 minutes, parks itself at the wall, and waits to be lifted out and charged rather than drawing power continuously.
Stated by the record itself. A robot being wrong for a household is a fact about fit, not a fault.
The upkeep ownership hands back to you, whatever the autonomy level says.
Classifications rest on different depths of evidence. A pre-release assessment and a verified one are not the same kind of claim.
| Robot | Evidence status | Sources reviewed | Last assessed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wybot C2 | Pending | 2 | Aug 2026 |
| Wybot C1 | Provisional | 3 | Aug 2026 |
Evidence status counts the sources behind a classification, not their kind. A high count can be maker documentation and price coverage, so read it as how much was reviewed rather than as independent testing. How we weigh evidence.
The full recordWybot C2Specifications, evidence, the Fit Check in full, and every tracked change.
The full recordWybot C1Specifications, evidence, the Fit Check in full, and every tracked change.Robovations classifies robots; it does not rank them. Nothing on this page is a recommendation, and no manufacturer influences a classification or its placement here.
Comparing across classes is allowed — the page will switch to per-class positioning and tell you it has.