
Greenworks
Greenworks Optimow 15
- Autonomy
- IIAssisted
- Score
- 58/100Capable
- Readiness
- Ready Now
- Price
- Not tracked

Greenworks

Stihl
Up to three
All robot lawn mowers. Every figure below is placed against the whole class, so a gap can be read against how much the class itself varies.
The conditions each robot was assessed against, side by side. Rows marked in gold are where these machines genuinely differ.
| Condition | Greenworks Optimow 15 | Stihl iMow 7 |
|---|---|---|
| Yard size | ||
| Under ¼ acre | GoodWell within the 0.37-acre coverage limit; capable, though a smaller-class mower may serve this lot equally well. | GoodOversized for small yards; covers efficiently but underutilizes runtime capacity. |
| ¼ – ½ acre | GoodSits within the documented 1,500 m² (0.37-acre) ceiling; the Optimow 15 is rated for this size range. | GoodIdeal deployment zone; systematic pattern and 420-min runtime cover this range in single session. |
| Over ½ acrethey differ | PoorCoverage limit is 1,500 m² (0.37 acres); yards over half an acre exceed the documented operating limit. | DependsRated 5,000 sq m (~1.24 acres), the top of the iMOW range; larger yards need a second machine rather than a larger one. |
| Terrain | ||
| Mostly flat | GoodFlat terrain is fully within operating envelope; no gradient concerns apply. | GoodFlat terrain is the baseline; iMow 7 excels without slope challenges limiting traction. |
| Gentle slopes | GoodRated for up to 35% gradient; moderate slopes are comfortably within documented operating limits. | GoodRated to 45% gradient; moderate slopes are well within operating specifications per owner reports. |
| Steep / hilly | DependsGreenworks specs the Optimow 15 at 35% maximum; sections near that limit warrant extra caution when grass is wet. | DependsNear the 45% limit on wet grass, traction degrades; dry conditions perform better than wet. |
| Grass type | ||
| Typical lawn grass | GoodRandomized mulching-cut pattern designed for standard-height turfgrass on a regular mowing schedule. | GoodStandard turf and lawn grasses are the design baseline; systematic mowing pattern optimized for normal growth. |
| Mixed / tall growth | DependsOvergrown grass above the blade design height may need a manual pre-cut before returning to regular automated sessions. | DependsTall or overgrown grass may require multiple passes; blade wear accelerates with dense growth. |
| Thick (Bermuda / Zoysia) | DependsDense thick-blade turf can slow progress; frequent short-duration passes are the documented mitigation for this grass type. | DependsThick Bermuda or St. Augustine grass reduces cut speed; may require reduced cutting-height settings or longer run-time allocation. |
| Boundary setup | ||
| Wireless required | PoorThe Optimow 15 requires physical perimeter wire; no wireless or GPS boundary option is available on this model. | PooriMow 7 requires physical perimeter wire; no wireless virtual-boundary option available. |
| Wire required | Good200 m of perimeter wire is included; the entire operating boundary is wire-defined, matching this setup. | GoodPhysical perimeter wire is the required boundary system; installation is a one-time setup cost. |
| No preference | GoodThis model is wire-only; factor in the one-time perimeter installation before committing to this setup. | GoodUses perimeter wire. Fits readers with no boundary preference; wire is required. |
A robot being poor for a condition is a fact about fit, not a fault. “Depends” means the record names a limit worth reading, not that the answer is unknown.
Nine inputs across three pillars, each weighted as shown and each scored so more is better. A robot can lead on one and trail on another, which is the point of showing them apart.
A number only means something next to the spread it sits in. Each track is the real range across every classified robot in the class, with the median marked.
Not compared, because fewer than two of these robots carry a published figure: Price.
Written on each record, and the only thing here every robot on the site carries.
What each design gives up to be good at what it is good at.
Wire installation is the price of entry: the Optimow 15 delivers genuine unsupervised mowing, but only after the owner commits several hours to perimeter-wire layout and staking.
Randomized cutting works, but systematic GPS-based mowing completes large areas faster and with more predictable pass distribution; the Optimow 15 trades path efficiency for a lower price tier.
Wire installation is a permanent setup: any lawn reconfiguration requires physical wire relocation, unlike virtual-boundary or GPS-based alternatives.
Systematic mowing pattern reduces pass overlap compared to random-path alternatives, but the iMow 7 slows for what its ultrasonic sensors register and bumps the rest; it does not plan a route around a newly placed obstacle.
Stated by the record itself. A robot being wrong for a household is a fact about fit, not a fault.
The upkeep ownership hands back to you, whatever the autonomy level says.
Classifications rest on different depths of evidence. A pre-release assessment and a verified one are not the same kind of claim.
| Robot | Evidence status | Sources reviewed | Last assessed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Greenworks Optimow 15 | Pending | 1 | Aug 2026 |
| Stihl iMow 7 | Pending | 5 | Aug 2026 |
Evidence status counts the sources behind a classification, not their kind. A high count can be maker documentation and price coverage, so read it as how much was reviewed rather than as independent testing. How we weigh evidence.
The full recordGreenworks Optimow 15Specifications, evidence, the Fit Check in full, and every tracked change.
The full recordStihl iMow 7Specifications, evidence, the Fit Check in full, and every tracked change.Robovations classifies robots; it does not rank them. Nothing on this page is a recommendation, and no manufacturer influences a classification or its placement here.
Comparing across classes is allowed — the page will switch to per-class positioning and tell you it has.