Skip to content
Saved

ComparisonSony Aibo ERS-1000 and temi V3

Up to three

All specialty robots. Every figure below is placed against the whole class, so a gap can be read against how much the class itself varies.

What the score is built from.

Nine inputs across three pillars, each weighted as shown and each scored so more is better. A robot can lead on one and trail on another, which is the point of showing them apart.

Capability

Task completion16% of score
Does it finish the job it is sold to do, unattended
  • Sony Aibo ERS-100091
  • temi V360
18median 72 across 433 scored robots100
Coverage and navigation10% of score
Does it work the whole area, and hold that between runs
  • Sony Aibo ERS-100050
  • temi V372
0median 70 across 421 scored robots100
Edge-case recovery10% of score
Does it recover from the failures its category presents
  • Sony Aibo ERS-100084
  • temi V343
18median 52 across 320 scored robots100
Operating envelope4% of score
How far conditions can vary before performance drops
  • Sony Aibo ERS-100075
  • temi V375
28median 68 across 397 scored robots100

Dependability

Field failure rate16% of score
Documented hardware failures per owner-year
  • Sony Aibo ERS-1000100
  • temi V364
6median 70 across 359 scored robots100
Software stability14% of score
Whether updates fix more than they break
  • Sony Aibo ERS-100082
  • temi V365
15median 65 across 342 scored robots100
Support longevity10% of score
Committed parts, service and updates, with dates
  • Sony Aibo ERS-100058
  • temi V355
0median 62 across 429 scored robots100

Ownership burden

Routine maintenance12% of score
Hands-on time it asks for in normal operation
  • Sony Aibo ERS-100084
  • temi V375
22median 67 across 434 scored robots100
Consumables8% of score
Parts that must be bought to keep it working
  • Sony Aibo ERS-100047
  • temi V357
8median 69 across 434 scored robots100