
Roborock
Roborock Qrevo Edge 2
- Autonomy
- IIIConditional
- Score
- 72/100Strong
- Readiness
- Ready Now
- Price
- $1,299.99list

Roborock

Up to three
All robot vacuums. Every figure below is placed against the whole class, so a gap can be read against how much the class itself varies.
The conditions each robot was assessed against, side by side. Rows marked in gold are where these machines genuinely differ.
| Condition | Roborock Qrevo Edge 2 | PowerDetect UV Reveal |
|---|---|---|
| Home size | ||
| Under 1,500 sqft | GoodVacuum Wars estimated about 1,208 sq ft per charge, enough for a home this size in one run. | GoodFully capable, but flagship pricing and dock footprint may exceed what compact homes require. |
| 1,500 – 3,000 | GoodRecharge and resume plus efficient navigation let it finish larger homes, per Vacuum Wars. | GoodIdeal target range; UV stain detection and mop retraction work well in mid-size multi-floor layouts. |
| Over 3,000they differ | DependsThe 240 mL bin can overflow before docking, and battery endurance tested below average. | GoodMulti-floor mapping and self-docking suit large homes. Single charge runtime unconfirmed; check battery specs on shipping units. |
| Primary floors | ||
| Hard floors | GoodBasic Tutorials found oatmeal, rice and coffee beans cleared from hard floors in one run. | GoodDual-tank mop system targets hard-floor stain detection; UV feature most valuable on sealed tile, wood, vinyl. |
| Low / medium pilethey differ | GoodVacuum Wars measured 94% embedded sand removal from medium-pile carpet, one of its highest results. | DependsMop retracts on low-pile carpet, but scrubbing force is light; vacuum-on-carpet performance not yet independently tested. |
| High pile / shagthey differ | DependsBasic Tutorials found a fluffy high-pile rug hard for it to clean and to drive across. | PoorMop retracting and wet system risk on shag carpet; non-mopping or dedicated mop models are safer choice. |
| Mopping needs | ||
| Vacuum only | GoodStrong vacuum; the mop lifts or detaches when not needed. | GoodStrong vacuum; the mop lifts or detaches when not needed. |
| Light mopping | GoodActive mopping system covers routine floors easily. | GoodActive mopping system covers routine floors easily. |
| Frequent mopping | GoodPressure or rotating mop with self-wash is built for frequent mopping. | GoodPressure or rotating mop with self-wash is built for frequent mopping. |
| You want to… | ||
| Empty bin myself | GoodOwners who expect some upkeep will find the dock empties, washes, dries and refills warm water. | GoodDual-tank system and UV bulb oversight fit owners who check dock weekly and manage consumables; higher effort than self-emptying vacuums. |
| Empty occasionally | GoodRemaining tasks are tank refills, dirty water, detergent and occasional bag changes. | GoodDock auto-washes mop pads and auto-empties dust (if auto-empty cartridge included); weekly water refill and monthly filter change is baseline mixed-effort. |
| Set-and-forgetthey differ | DependsTanks are filled and emptied by hand and detergent is added manually, so it needs regular visits. | PoorDual water tanks require weekly refills; mop-wash dock motor failures require manual intervention. Set-and-forget unrealistic with this system. |
A robot being poor for a condition is a fact about fit, not a fault. “Depends” means the record names a limit worth reading, not that the answer is unknown.
Nine inputs across three pillars, each weighted as shown and each scored so more is better. A robot can lead on one and trail on another, which is the point of showing them apart.
A number only means something next to the spread it sits in. Each track is the real range across every classified robot in the class, with the median marked.
Not compared, because fewer than two of these robots carry a published figure: Suction, Runtime, Charge time, Noise.
Written on each record, and the only thing here every robot on the site carries.
What each design gives up to be good at what it is good at.
The retracting LiDAR buys a 3.14 in profile; the 240 mL bin is the space it gave up.
Carpet and mopping results led Vacuum Wars’ averages, while obstacle avoidance fell below its predecessor.
UV Stain Detect paired with HyperSonic scrubbing at 100 cycles per minute makes dried residue this machine’s strongest result, but Shark ships the capability only in the $1,299 robot-and-base package.
UV Stain Detect works on the first pass, including in a home the robot has never mapped, but confirming a stain is gone means a verification pass back over the same ground, so heavily soiled floors take longer to finish.
Stated by the record itself. A robot being wrong for a household is a fact about fit, not a fault.
The upkeep ownership hands back to you, whatever the autonomy level says.
Classifications rest on different depths of evidence. A pre-release assessment and a verified one are not the same kind of claim.
| Robot | Evidence status | Sources reviewed | Last assessed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Roborock Qrevo Edge 2 | Provisional | 4 | Sep 2026 |
| Shark PowerDetect UV Reveal | Verified | 7 | Sep 2026 |
Evidence status counts the sources behind a classification, not their kind. A high count can be maker documentation and price coverage, so read it as how much was reviewed rather than as independent testing. How we weigh evidence.
The full recordRoborock Qrevo Edge 2Specifications, evidence, the Fit Check in full, and every tracked change.
The full recordShark PowerDetect UV RevealSpecifications, evidence, the Fit Check in full, and every tracked change.Robovations classifies robots; it does not rank them. Nothing on this page is a recommendation, and no manufacturer influences a classification or its placement here.
Comparing across classes is allowed — the page will switch to per-class positioning and tell you it has.