Skip to content
Saved
Comparison · 2 robots

HOBOT 2S · HOBOT 388 Ultrasonic

All robot window cleaners. Every measure below is plotted against the full class, so a difference can be read against how much the class itself varies.

  1. HOBOT 2S
  2. HOBOT 388 Ultrasonic
HOBOT

HOBOT 2S

Autonomy
IIAssisted Autonomy
Score
51/100 Limited
Readiness
Ready Now
Price
$349list

Up to three

01 Classification

What each one does on its own.

The Autonomy Ladder is the same five rungs for every robot on the site. A rung describes the conditions a robot handles without you, not how good it is.

V
Generalized
Any task, any setting
IV
Environmental
Handles new obstacles without help
III
Conditional
Finishes familiar jobs on its own
II
Assisted
Runs preset routines, needs rescue
HOBOT 2SHOBOT 388 Ultrasonic
I
Manual
One action, on command
02 Assessment

Where they actually differ.

The Robovations Score is nine inputs across three pillars, each weighted as shown and each scored so that more is better. A robot can lead on one and trail on another, which is the point of showing them apart. Cost of ownership and data handling are reported on each robot's own page and are never averaged into the score.

Capability

Task completion16% of score
Does it finish the job it is sold to do, unattended
  • HOBOT 2S60
  • HOBOT 388 Ultrasonic75
18median 72 across 433 scored robots100
Coverage and navigation10% of score
Does it work the whole area, and hold that between runs
  • HOBOT 2S45
  • HOBOT 388 Ultrasonic70
0median 70 across 421 scored robots100
Edge-case recovery10% of score
Does it recover from the failures its category presents
  • HOBOT 2S30
  • HOBOT 388 Ultrasonic50
18median 52 across 320 scored robots100
Operating envelope4% of score
How far conditions can vary before performance drops
  • HOBOT 2S55
  • HOBOT 388 Ultrasonic65
28median 68 across 397 scored robots100

Dependability

Field failure rate16% of score
Documented hardware failures per owner-year
  • HOBOT 2S56
  • HOBOT 388 Ultrasonic85
6median 70 across 359 scored robots100
Software stability14% of score
Whether updates fix more than they break
  • HOBOT 2S65
  • HOBOT 388 Ultrasonic33
15median 65 across 342 scored robots100
Support longevity10% of score
Committed parts, service and updates, with dates
  • HOBOT 2S48
  • HOBOT 388 Ultrasonic73
0median 62 across 429 scored robots100

Ownership burden

Routine maintenance12% of score
Hands-on time it asks for in normal operation
  • HOBOT 2S28
  • HOBOT 388 Ultrasonic34
22median 67 across 434 scored robots100
Consumables8% of score
Parts that must be bought to keep it working
  • HOBOT 2S66
  • HOBOT 388 Ultrasonic91
8median 69 across 434 scored robots100
03 Measured against the class

How far apart is a long way?

A number only means something next to the spread it sits in. Each track below is the real range across every classified robot in the class, with the median marked.

Price21 with a published figure
  • HOBOT 2S$349
  • HOBOT 388 Ultrasonic$299
$150median $349$850
Weight22 with a published figure
  • HOBOT 2S2.9 lbs
  • HOBOT 388 Ultrasonic2 lbs
1.3 lbsmedian 3.1 lbs4.8 lbs
Height23 with a published figure
  • HOBOT 2S3.4 in
  • HOBOT 388 Ultrasonic3.7 in
2.2 inmedian 3.3 in9.4 in

Not compared, because fewer than two of these robots carry a published figure: Suction, Runtime, Charge time, Noise.

04 Ownership

What the numbers leave out.

The trade-off

What each design gives up to be good at what it is good at.

HOBOT 2S

You gain stable autonomous cleaning of a pane once positioned, but you lose multi-window autonomy. Manual placement is the structural constraint.

Dual ultrasonic spray nozzles wet the pane evenly, but they draw from one tank, so a large job means taking the unit off the glass to refill.

You are freed from the ladder, but the machine is never untethered: a 4.5 m safety rope anchored to a fixed object indoors and a permanently attached 5 m mains cord are both part of every session.

HOBOT 388 Ultrasonic

Applying water as a mist rather than a soak keeps run-off off the sill, but a saturated pad on consecutive heavily-soiled panes still requires a mid-session swap that interrupts the automated workflow.

Coverage within a single pane is systematic and unattended; the unit cannot advance to the next pane without the owner relocating it and re-anchoring the rope.

Who each one is wrong for

Stated by the record itself. A robot being wrong for a household is a fact about fit, not a fault.

HOBOT 2S
Hands-off scheduling automation seekers
The app and the bundled remote control a session in progress, but every pane still needs the unit lifted, placed and started by hand. Owner involvement is per window, not per house.
Multi-story buildings with distributed windows
Frequent repositioning between stories becomes repetitive labor, and each new position means re-anchoring the rope indoors and finding a socket within 5 m.
Owners with irregular or architectural detailing
The Edge-Leakage Sensor works by detecting the air leak when the pad breaks its seal at an edge, so it reads frameless glass as well as framed. Deep recesses and heavy architectural detailing still limit where the unit can be placed and raise how often it needs repositioning by hand.
Properties with limited nearby water supply
The unit carries a single water tank module refilled by hand, which on a large job means taking it off the glass and walking back to a tap. HOBOT publishes no per-fill coverage figure.
HOBOT 388 Ultrasonic
Users expecting hands-free multi-window automation
Every pane requires manual placement, pad attachment, and safety rope anchoring. The unit automates the scrubbing path within a pane but does not eliminate per-window setup effort.
Homes with textured, frosted, or divided-pane glass
Surface irregularities break the suction seal. Owner reports confirm the unit detaches or loses path on patterned or divided glass, which is a safety risk in addition to a cleaning failure.
Buyers seeking a fully autonomous set-and-forget appliance
Window cleaners in this category require active supervision per session. The 388 automates path coverage within a pane, not the overall cleaning workflow across a home.
Owners with small standard windows cleaned rarely
Manual squeegee effort on small panes is often faster than the 388 setup cycle. The time-savings case is strongest on large or difficult-to-reach glass.

What stays your job

The upkeep ownership hands back to you, whatever the autonomy level says.

HOBOT 2S
  • Before every use: Run the safety rope through your hands along its full length and check both end fittings; replace it if any strands are cut, frayed or abraded. Confirm the indoor anchor is a fixed object that will not move under load.
  • Before every use: Inspect the permanently attached power cord for nicks, crushing or exposed conductors along its length.
  • After every use: Remove and wring the microfiber pads, then dry them fully before storage.
  • Weekly (if heavy use): Inspect vacuum motor intake for dust clogs with a soft brush.
  • Every 2-4 weeks: Check the rubber sealing ring for hair or debris; clean with a damp cloth.
  • Monthly: Run a vinegar solution through the ultrasonic spray nozzles to clear mineral buildup.
  • By condition: Replace microfiber pads when matted or thinning (approximately $20-30 per pair). The water tank is a single module, replaced with one screw.
HOBOT 388 Ultrasonic
  • After every use: Remove microfiber pad, rinse with water, and hang to dry before storage.
  • After every use: Wipe suction ring with a clean damp cloth to remove glass cleaner residue that degrades the seal over time.
  • Monthly: Inspect safety rope for fraying; replace if any strand damage is visible before next use.
  • Every 3-6 months: Clean suction motor intake port with a dry brush to remove dust accumulation that reduces grip force.
  • Every 3-6 months: Check pad contact surface on the cleaning head for mineral buildup; rinse with diluted white vinegar if present.
  • Annually: Inspect power cable and connector for sheath cracking; manufacturer recommends replacement if outer jacket is compromised.
05 Evidence

How much each of these is standing on.

Classifications rest on different depths of evidence. A pre-release assessment and a verified one are not the same kind of claim.

Evidence behind each classification
Robot Evidence status Sources reviewed Last assessed
HOBOT 2S Provisional 4 Sep 2026
HOBOT 388 Ultrasonic Provisional 7 Aug 2026

Robovations classifies robots; it does not rank them. Nothing on this page is a recommendation, and no manufacturer influences a classification or its placement here.