
Beatbot
Beatbot AquaSense Pro
- Autonomy
- IIIConditional
- Score
- 66/100Capable
- Readiness
- Ready Now
- Price
- $2,199list

Beatbot

Hayward
Up to three
All robot pool cleaners. Every figure below is placed against the whole class, so a gap can be read against how much the class itself varies.
The conditions each robot was assessed against, side by side. Rows marked in gold are where these machines genuinely differ.
| Condition | Beatbot AquaSense Pro | Hayward AquaVac 650 |
|---|---|---|
| Pool type | ||
| In-ground | GoodDesigned for in-ground installations; smart-mapping calibration optimized for fixed pool geometry. | GoodDesigned for in-ground gunite/plaster pools; dock placement requires dedicated 110V outlet and 10-foot clearance. |
| Above-groundthey differ | DependsWorks but optical sensor calibration more sensitive to pool wall material; vinyl above-ground pools require careful mapping setup. | PoorBrush geometry and dock coupling target in-ground installations; vinyl walls not compatible with HexDrive pads. |
| Mixed setup | GoodSmart-mapping adapts to both in-ground and above-ground installations when initial calibration accounts for pool material. | GoodStandard for this category, see specs for confirmation. |
| Pool size | ||
| Small (< 400 sqft) | Good90-minute runtime covers small pools under 1500 sqft in single session; ideal use case per owner reports. | GoodCapable but overkill for pools under 8,000 gallons; smaller battery-powered units offer better cost alignment. |
| Medium (400 – 800) | GoodOptimal range for 1500-3000 sqft pools; battery runtime completes full coverage in typical weekly cleaning cycle. | GoodIdeal target: 12k–18k gallons. Two-hour runtime covers a single session without battery strain. |
| Large (> 800) | DependsPools over 3000 sqft require multiple launches per cleaning session; battery depletion mid-cycle limits single-session autonomy. | DependsConsecutive sessions required for 20k+ gallon pools; multiple cycles per week increase dock-seal wear patterns. |
| Debris load | ||
| Fine (sand / silt) | GoodFilter cartridge handles fine particles (sand, pollen) without suction loss in normal maintenance intervals. | GoodPleated intake filter handles silt and algae detritus effectively; weekly rinse prevents clogging. |
| Leaves / large debristhey differ | DependsHigh leaf loads reduce battery runtime and increase filter replacement frequency from 2-4 weeks to weekly replacement in autumn. | Good18L debris bin covers heavy autumn load; daily empties typical in peak seasons. |
| Algae / heavy foulingthey differ | PoorHeavy algae blooms confuse optical smart-mapping sensors; coverage gaps and sensor recalibration errors documented in owner reports. | DependsWaterline brush targets surface-film algae well; free-floating algae requires pre-filtration. |
| Coverage you want | ||
| Floor onlythey differ | GoodSystematic floor coverage is core capability; smart-mapping ensures 100 percent floor contact without missed spots. | DependsCapable but this robot targets floor + waterline; wall coverage requires manual intervention. |
| Floor + wallsthey differ | GoodWaterline and wall coverage documented in manufacturer specs and owner reports; two-brush design handles vertical surfaces. | PoorHexDrive geometry does not reach vertical walls; only floor and waterline are documented. |
| Floor + walls + waterlinethey differ | GoodFlotation line cleaning included in smart-mapping routine; no separate waterline mode required. | PoorWaterline reach is documented; wall coverage and suction line pathing are not autonomous. |
A robot being poor for a condition is a fact about fit, not a fault. “Depends” means the record names a limit worth reading, not that the answer is unknown.
Nine inputs across three pillars, each weighted as shown and each scored so more is better. A robot can lead on one and trail on another, which is the point of showing them apart.
A number only means something next to the spread it sits in. Each track is the real range across every classified robot in the class, with the median marked.
Not compared, because fewer than two of these robots carry a published figure: Runtime, Charge time.
Written on each record, and the only thing here every robot on the site carries.
What each design gives up to be good at what it is good at.
Published runtime reaches up to 9.5 hours skimming the surface, but floor cleaning is rated to 5 hours: the more demanding mode is the one that sets what a single charge will cover.
Cordless operation removes the cable and its tangling failure mode, but it also removes shore power: coverage per session is bounded by the pack, and the unit is placed in the water by hand at the start of every cycle.
Mains power removes any runtime ceiling, so a full floor, wall and waterline cycle runs to completion in one pass, but the 55 ft cord has to be paid out and retrieved at every session.
SpinTech separation takes the filter cartridge out of the ownership cost entirely, but debris still has to be emptied from the canister by hand after each cycle.
Stated by the record itself. A robot being wrong for a household is a fact about fit, not a fault.
The upkeep ownership hands back to you, whatever the autonomy level says.
Classifications rest on different depths of evidence. A pre-release assessment and a verified one are not the same kind of claim.
| Robot | Evidence status | Sources reviewed | Last assessed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Beatbot AquaSense Pro | Provisional | 4 | Sep 2026 |
| Hayward AquaVac 650 | Discontinued | 5 | Aug 2026 |
Evidence status counts the sources behind a classification, not their kind. A high count can be maker documentation and price coverage, so read it as how much was reviewed rather than as independent testing. How we weigh evidence.
The full recordBeatbot AquaSense ProSpecifications, evidence, the Fit Check in full, and every tracked change.
The full recordHayward AquaVac 650Specifications, evidence, the Fit Check in full, and every tracked change.Robovations classifies robots; it does not rank them. Nothing on this page is a recommendation, and no manufacturer influences a classification or its placement here.
Comparing across classes is allowed — the page will switch to per-class positioning and tell you it has.