
Roborock
Roborock Qrevo S
- Autonomy
- IIIConditional
- Score
- 79/100Strong
- Readiness
- Ready Now
- Price
- $799list

Roborock

iRobot
Up to three
All robot vacuums. Every figure below is placed against the whole class, so a gap can be read against how much the class itself varies.
The conditions each robot was assessed against, side by side. Rows marked in gold are where these machines genuinely differ.
| Condition | Roborock Qrevo S | Roomba Plus 678 Combo |
|---|---|---|
| Home size | ||
| Under 1,500 sqft | Good120-min runtime exceeds typical compact-home cleaning cycles. Capable but overkill for small spaces. | GoodRecharge-and-resume and retained LiDAR mapping comfortably cover a compact single-level home in one scheduled run. |
| 1,500 – 3,000 | GoodRuntime covers 1,500-2,500 sqft in one pass. Rotating pads effective on typical mid-size floor mixes. | GoodSystematic LiDAR mapping and recharge-and-resume are built for this range; typical single-level layouts complete in one scheduled run. |
| Over 3,000 | Depends120-min runtime may require two passes on 3,500+ sqft homes. Multi-floor support available but with separate dock runs. | DependsIndependent multi-level or large-home coverage testing does not yet exist for this model; recharge-and-resume adds passes rather than eliminating them. |
| Primary floors | ||
| Hard floors | GoodDual rotating pads optimized for hard floors. Suction and pad coverage both rated for hard surfaces. | GoodThe PowerSpin roller and LiDAR navigation are built around hard-floor vacuum-plus-mop runs. |
| Low / medium pile | GoodRotating pads designed for low-pile carpet transitions. Owner reports consistent performance. | GoodThe roller auto-lifts on low-pile carpet detection; suction performance on carpet is not independently benchmarked. |
| High pile / shagthey differ | PoorRotating pads not designed for high-pile or shag carpet. Manufacturer documentation does not recommend. | DependsNo independent suction or high-pile test results are documented for this model, and rated suction trails the Max-tier sibling. |
| Mopping needs | ||
| Vacuum only | GoodStrong vacuum; the mop lifts or detaches when not needed. | GoodStrong vacuum; the mop lifts or detaches when not needed. |
| Light mopping | GoodActive mopping system covers routine floors easily. | GoodActive mopping system covers routine floors easily. |
| Frequent mopping | GoodPressure or rotating mop with self-wash is built for frequent mopping. | GoodPressure or rotating mop with self-wash is built for frequent mopping. |
| You want to… | ||
| Empty bin myself | GoodDock automation handles some tasks, but monthly water chamber cleaning and quarterly pad swaps are required. | GoodThe dock automates roller washing and bin emptying, but a hands-on reader can still top off concentrate and run manual clean cycles. |
| Empty occasionally | GoodAuto-dock mop washing and dust emptying reduce hands-on effort. Monthly descaling and quarterly pad replacement are the main manual tasks. | GoodThe AutoWash dock's self-wash and self-empty cycles handle most routine upkeep between periodic concentrate refills and bag swaps. |
| Set-and-forgetthey differ | PoorQuarterly pad replacement and monthly dock maintenance prevent fully hands-off operation. | DependsThe dock automates washing and emptying, but the concentrate reservoir and self-empty bag still need periodic manual refills, so it is not fully hands-off. |
A robot being poor for a condition is a fact about fit, not a fault. “Depends” means the record names a limit worth reading, not that the answer is unknown.
Nine inputs across three pillars, each weighted as shown and each scored so more is better. A robot can lead on one and trail on another, which is the point of showing them apart.
A number only means something next to the spread it sits in. Each track is the real range across every classified robot in the class, with the median marked.
Not compared, because fewer than two of these robots carry a published figure: Runtime, Charge time, Noise, Weight.
Written on each record, and the only thing here every robot on the site carries.
What each design gives up to be good at what it is good at.
The arm is the Master’s signature feature, not the Qrevo S’s flaw. You are choosing a product designed for broad compatibility over narrow edge dominance. The cost difference reflects that choice, not a manufacturing downgrade.
The AutoWash dock hot-washes and heat-dries the roller mop and auto-empties the bin, but that is more moving parts in the dock than a dry-empty-only station, and none of it has independent long-term reliability data yet.
Undercuts the Max 875 Combo by roughly $300 with the same AutoWash dock architecture, but at lower rated suction (30,000 Pa), so the price gap likely tracks a real carpet-cleaning gap, not just branding.
Stated by the record itself. A robot being wrong for a household is a fact about fit, not a fault.
The upkeep ownership hands back to you, whatever the autonomy level says.
Classifications rest on different depths of evidence. A pre-release assessment and a verified one are not the same kind of claim.
| Robot | Evidence status | Sources reviewed | Last assessed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Roborock Qrevo S | Pending | 5 | Aug 2026 |
| iRobot Roomba Plus 678 Combo | Verified | 7 | Sep 2026 |
Evidence status counts the sources behind a classification, not their kind. A high count can be maker documentation and price coverage, so read it as how much was reviewed rather than as independent testing. How we weigh evidence.
The full recordRoborock Qrevo SSpecifications, evidence, the Fit Check in full, and every tracked change.
The full recordiRobot Roomba Plus 678 ComboSpecifications, evidence, the Fit Check in full, and every tracked change.Robovations classifies robots; it does not rank them. Nothing on this page is a recommendation, and no manufacturer influences a classification or its placement here.
Comparing across classes is allowed — the page will switch to per-class positioning and tell you it has.