
Roborock
Roborock Qrevo Edge S5A
- Autonomy
- IIIConditional
- Score
- 84/100Strong
- Readiness
- Ready Now
- Price
- $999.99list

Roborock

iRobot
Up to three
All robot vacuums. Every figure below is placed against the whole class, so a gap can be read against how much the class itself varies.
The conditions each robot was assessed against, side by side. Rows marked in gold are where these machines genuinely differ.
| Condition | Qrevo Edge S5A | Roomba Plus 678 Combo |
|---|---|---|
| Home size | ||
| Under 1,500 sqft | GoodRuntime and coverage suit compact homes; single charge handles most 1,500 sqft homes in one pass on low suction. | GoodRecharge-and-resume and retained LiDAR mapping comfortably cover a compact single-level home in one scheduled run. |
| 1,500 – 3,000they differ | DependsCoverage is solid, but ~120 min runtime may require recharge between floors on high suction; multi-floor homes may span two charging cycles. | GoodSystematic LiDAR mapping and recharge-and-resume are built for this range; typical single-level layouts complete in one scheduled run. |
| Over 3,000they differ | PoorRuntime inadequate for homes over 3,000 sqft; multi-floor coverage requires multiple recharge breaks and extended session times. | DependsIndependent multi-level or large-home coverage testing does not yet exist for this model; recharge-and-resume adds passes rather than eliminating them. |
| Primary floors | ||
| Hard floors | Good18,500 Pa suction on hard floors is efficient; edge-cleaning side brush performs well on transitions between tile and carpet. | GoodThe PowerSpin roller and LiDAR navigation are built around hard-floor vacuum-plus-mop runs. |
| Low / medium pile | GoodStandard Qrevo suction rating matches low-pile carpet; manufacturer specs document no performance loss on this surface type. | GoodThe roller auto-lifts on low-pile carpet detection; suction performance on carpet is not independently benchmarked. |
| High pile / shagthey differ | PoorOwner reports document suction loss on shag and high-pile carpets; 18,500 Pa sits below the threshold needed for plush surfaces. | DependsNo independent suction or high-pile test results are documented for this model, and rated suction trails the Max-tier sibling. |
| Mopping needs | ||
| Vacuum only | GoodStrong vacuum; the mop lifts or detaches when not needed. | GoodStrong vacuum; the mop lifts or detaches when not needed. |
| Light mopping | GoodActive mopping system covers routine floors easily. | GoodActive mopping system covers routine floors easily. |
| Frequent mopping | GoodPressure or rotating mop with self-wash is built for frequent mopping. | GoodPressure or rotating mop with self-wash is built for frequent mopping. |
| You want to… | ||
| Empty bin myself | GoodMonthly dust-bag swap and weekly brush cleaning match owners who prefer active maintenance over set-and-forget automation. | GoodThe dock automates roller washing and bin emptying, but a hands-on reader can still top off concentrate and run manual clean cycles. |
| Empty occasionallythey differ | DependsRequires monthly intervention for dust bags, but no mop-wash cycle or auto-dry. Less frequent than manual-vacuum, more hands-on than flagship auto-empty. | GoodThe AutoWash dock's self-wash and self-empty cycles handle most routine upkeep between periodic concentrate refills and bag swaps. |
| Set-and-forgetthey differ | PoorMonthly dust-bag replacement and quarterly deep cleans are unavoidable; dock has no auto-empty or mop-wash to reduce owner effort. | DependsThe dock automates washing and emptying, but the concentrate reservoir and self-empty bag still need periodic manual refills, so it is not fully hands-off. |
A robot being poor for a condition is a fact about fit, not a fault. “Depends” means the record names a limit worth reading, not that the answer is unknown.
Nine inputs across three pillars, each weighted as shown and each scored so more is better. A robot can lead on one and trail on another, which is the point of showing them apart.
A number only means something next to the spread it sits in. Each track is the real range across every classified robot in the class, with the median marked.
Not compared, because fewer than two of these robots carry a published figure: Runtime, Charge time, Noise.
Written on each record, and the only thing here every robot on the site carries.
What each design gives up to be good at what it is good at.
The Multifunctional Dock 3.0 takes over emptying, washing, drying and refilling, but it is a full-size station that needs a permanent spot near an outlet, and its own clean and waste water tanks are still filled and emptied by hand.
Standard dock requires monthly intervention, yet the robot maps like a $1,200 flagship; capability ceiling is high, but ownership floor is unchanged.
The AutoWash dock hot-washes and heat-dries the roller mop and auto-empties the bin, but that is more moving parts in the dock than a dry-empty-only station, and none of it has independent long-term reliability data yet.
Undercuts the Max 875 Combo by roughly $300 with the same AutoWash dock architecture, but at lower rated suction (30,000 Pa), so the price gap likely tracks a real carpet-cleaning gap, not just branding.
Stated by the record itself. A robot being wrong for a household is a fact about fit, not a fault.
The upkeep ownership hands back to you, whatever the autonomy level says.
Classifications rest on different depths of evidence. A pre-release assessment and a verified one are not the same kind of claim.
| Robot | Evidence status | Sources reviewed | Last assessed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Roborock Qrevo Edge S5A | Pending | 6 | Aug 2026 |
| iRobot Roomba Plus 678 Combo | Verified | 7 | Sep 2026 |
Evidence status counts the sources behind a classification, not their kind. A high count can be maker documentation and price coverage, so read it as how much was reviewed rather than as independent testing. How we weigh evidence.
The full recordRoborock Qrevo Edge S5ASpecifications, evidence, the Fit Check in full, and every tracked change.
The full recordiRobot Roomba Plus 678 ComboSpecifications, evidence, the Fit Check in full, and every tracked change.Robovations classifies robots; it does not rank them. Nothing on this page is a recommendation, and no manufacturer influences a classification or its placement here.
Comparing across classes is allowed — the page will switch to per-class positioning and tell you it has.