
Maytronics
Maytronics Dolphin M700
- Autonomy
- IIIConditional
- Score
- 71/100Strong
- Readiness
- Ready Now
- Price
- $2,499list

Maytronics

Wybot
Up to three
All robot pool cleaners. Every figure below is placed against the whole class, so a gap can be read against how much the class itself varies.
The conditions each robot was assessed against, side by side. Rows marked in gold are where these machines genuinely differ.
| Condition | Dolphin M700 | Wybot S3 |
|---|---|---|
| Pool type | ||
| In-ground | GoodDesigned for in-ground gunite and vinyl liner pools; dock positioning expects fixed structural installation. | GoodDesigned for in-ground gunite pools. Dock positioning and waterline reach optimized for standard depth/slope geometry. |
| Above-groundthey differ | PoorCable routing and dock anchoring assume in-ground pool features; above-ground pool walls and perimeter lack compatible attachment points. | DependsAbove-ground pools under 10,000 gallons risk over-capacity for dock footprint. Shallow models may limit wall coverage; confirm dock fit before purchase. |
| Mixed setup | GoodFlexible for any in-ground pool type; confirm dock location and cable routing before purchase. | GoodThis robot addresses both pool types. Verify dock placement and cable routing for your setup. |
| Pool size | ||
| Small (< 400 sqft) | GoodM700 is rated for 15,000+ gallon pools; smaller pools result in overlapping coverage and excessive filter cycling costs. | GoodUnder 5,000 gallons: flagship robot and self-emptying dock exceed small-pool maintenance needs. Overkill for compact pools; mid-range cordless models more economical. |
| Medium (400 – 800) | GoodOptimized for 15,000–25,000 gallon in-ground pools; weekly dual-mode schedule covers floor and waterline thoroughly. | Good5,000–15,000 gallons: ideal range. 90–120 min per charge handles single-pass coverage or multi-session cleaning for heavy debris weeks. |
| Large (> 800) | GoodPools 25,000–35,000 gallons benefit from M700's extended runtime; single cycle provides adequate floor and wall coverage. | Good15,000–30,000 gallons: dock automation and cordless freedom shine. Multi-session scheduling manageable; dock self-emptying reduces operator burden. |
| Debris load | ||
| Fine (sand / silt) | GoodFine-debris mode filter (pleated paper) excels at algae spores and silt; recommended for spring and summer use. | GoodSand and fine sediment: dock suction handles routine drainage; filter manageable with dock assist. Confirm filter mesh durability in high-silt environments. |
| Leaves / large debris | GoodLeaf-load mode filter (mesh screen) prioritizes rapid cycling over fine filtration; optimized for fall seasonal debris. | GoodLeaf-heavy pools: cordless operation supports frequent short runs without cable hassle. Large debris basket and dock capacity suit seasonal leaf management. |
| Algae / heavy fouling | DependsFine-debris mode reaches algae film but not thick blooms; pre-treatment of >2mm algae required. | DependsAlgae bloom recovery: robot aids removal, but chemical treatment required first. Dock filter may clog after algae cleanup; manual rinse likely needed. |
| Coverage you want | ||
| Floor only | GoodEnhanced grid navigation provides 95%+ floor coverage in standard in-ground layouts; consistency improved vs M600. | GoodFloor coverage only: 3D mapping optimizes floor paths. Waterline and wall features unused; simpler maintenance profile than full-reach model. |
| Floor + walls | GoodNarrower profile reaches walls up to 45° incline; corner access is 20–30% better than comparable models. | GoodFloor and wall cleaning: strong suit. 36-sensor suite maps vertical surfaces; dock placement matters for wall-reach consistency. |
| Floor + walls + waterline | GoodDual waterline brushes handle both light algae and mineral deposits; tile and plaster reach is consistent across both filter modes. | GoodFull waterline reach: designed for this mode. Dock automation minimizes manual waterline supplementation, though mineral buildup may persist in hard-water pools. |
A robot being poor for a condition is a fact about fit, not a fault. “Depends” means the record names a limit worth reading, not that the answer is unknown.
Nine inputs across three pillars, each weighted as shown and each scored so more is better. A robot can lead on one and trail on another, which is the point of showing them apart.
A number only means something next to the spread it sits in. Each track is the real range across every classified robot in the class, with the median marked.
Not compared, because fewer than two of these robots carry a published figure: Runtime, Charge time, Noise, Height.
Written on each record, and the only thing here every robot on the site carries.
What each design gives up to be good at what it is good at.
One extra-large cartridge takes fine and ultra-fine debris together, but changing which media is fitted is a physical swap: the standard and ultra-fine kits are exchanged by hand at the machine, not selected in the app.
The extra-large cartridge stretches the interval between emptyings, but emptying means lifting the whole robot out: 11.5 kg (25.4 lbs) out of the water, top open, rinsed with a hose.
Cordless, self-docking, and self-emptying comes at flagship price: $2,999 regular, currently discounted to $2,499 on pre-order, places it above mid-range robotic cleaners; the upgrade premium is substantial if dock automation is not the point.
Waterline reach is mapped, not guaranteed: 3D mapping places cleaner at waterline, but scaling and mineral buildup may require supplemental manual brushing on heavy-stain pools.
Stated by the record itself. A robot being wrong for a household is a fact about fit, not a fault.
The upkeep ownership hands back to you, whatever the autonomy level says.
Classifications rest on different depths of evidence. A pre-release assessment and a verified one are not the same kind of claim.
| Robot | Evidence status | Sources reviewed | Last assessed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maytronics Dolphin M700 | Provisional | 3 | Aug 2026 |
| Wybot S3 | Pending | 1 | Aug 2026 |
Evidence status counts the sources behind a classification, not their kind. A high count can be maker documentation and price coverage, so read it as how much was reviewed rather than as independent testing. How we weigh evidence.
The full recordMaytronics Dolphin M700Specifications, evidence, the Fit Check in full, and every tracked change.
The full recordWybot S3Specifications, evidence, the Fit Check in full, and every tracked change.Robovations classifies robots; it does not rank them. Nothing on this page is a recommendation, and no manufacturer influences a classification or its placement here.
Comparing across classes is allowed — the page will switch to per-class positioning and tell you it has.