Skip to content
Saved

ComparisonMaytronics Dolphin M700 and Wybot S3

Up to three

All robot pool cleaners. Every figure below is placed against the whole class, so a gap can be read against how much the class itself varies.

Where each one suits you.

The conditions each robot was assessed against, side by side. Rows marked in gold are where these machines genuinely differ.

Fit verdicts by condition for each robot
Condition Dolphin M700 Wybot S3
Pool type
In-ground GoodDesigned for in-ground gunite and vinyl liner pools; dock positioning expects fixed structural installation. GoodDesigned for in-ground gunite pools. Dock positioning and waterline reach optimized for standard depth/slope geometry.
Above-groundthey differ PoorCable routing and dock anchoring assume in-ground pool features; above-ground pool walls and perimeter lack compatible attachment points. DependsAbove-ground pools under 10,000 gallons risk over-capacity for dock footprint. Shallow models may limit wall coverage; confirm dock fit before purchase.
Mixed setup GoodFlexible for any in-ground pool type; confirm dock location and cable routing before purchase. GoodThis robot addresses both pool types. Verify dock placement and cable routing for your setup.
Pool size
Small (< 400 sqft) GoodM700 is rated for 15,000+ gallon pools; smaller pools result in overlapping coverage and excessive filter cycling costs. GoodUnder 5,000 gallons: flagship robot and self-emptying dock exceed small-pool maintenance needs. Overkill for compact pools; mid-range cordless models more economical.
Medium (400 – 800) GoodOptimized for 15,000–25,000 gallon in-ground pools; weekly dual-mode schedule covers floor and waterline thoroughly. Good5,000–15,000 gallons: ideal range. 90–120 min per charge handles single-pass coverage or multi-session cleaning for heavy debris weeks.
Large (> 800) GoodPools 25,000–35,000 gallons benefit from M700's extended runtime; single cycle provides adequate floor and wall coverage. Good15,000–30,000 gallons: dock automation and cordless freedom shine. Multi-session scheduling manageable; dock self-emptying reduces operator burden.
Debris load
Fine (sand / silt) GoodFine-debris mode filter (pleated paper) excels at algae spores and silt; recommended for spring and summer use. GoodSand and fine sediment: dock suction handles routine drainage; filter manageable with dock assist. Confirm filter mesh durability in high-silt environments.
Leaves / large debris GoodLeaf-load mode filter (mesh screen) prioritizes rapid cycling over fine filtration; optimized for fall seasonal debris. GoodLeaf-heavy pools: cordless operation supports frequent short runs without cable hassle. Large debris basket and dock capacity suit seasonal leaf management.
Algae / heavy fouling DependsFine-debris mode reaches algae film but not thick blooms; pre-treatment of >2mm algae required. DependsAlgae bloom recovery: robot aids removal, but chemical treatment required first. Dock filter may clog after algae cleanup; manual rinse likely needed.
Coverage you want
Floor only GoodEnhanced grid navigation provides 95%+ floor coverage in standard in-ground layouts; consistency improved vs M600. GoodFloor coverage only: 3D mapping optimizes floor paths. Waterline and wall features unused; simpler maintenance profile than full-reach model.
Floor + walls GoodNarrower profile reaches walls up to 45° incline; corner access is 20–30% better than comparable models. GoodFloor and wall cleaning: strong suit. 36-sensor suite maps vertical surfaces; dock placement matters for wall-reach consistency.
Floor + walls + waterline GoodDual waterline brushes handle both light algae and mineral deposits; tile and plaster reach is consistent across both filter modes. GoodFull waterline reach: designed for this mode. Dock automation minimizes manual waterline supplementation, though mineral buildup may persist in hard-water pools.

A robot being poor for a condition is a fact about fit, not a fault. “Depends” means the record names a limit worth reading, not that the answer is unknown.

Keep going.

Robovations classifies robots; it does not rank them. Nothing on this page is a recommendation, and no manufacturer influences a classification or its placement here.