Skip to content
Saved

ComparisonMammotion Yuka 2000 and Worx Landroid Vision Cloud WR340

Up to three

All robot lawn mowers. Every figure below is placed against the whole class, so a gap can be read against how much the class itself varies.

Where each one suits you.

The conditions each robot was assessed against, side by side. Rows marked in gold are where these machines genuinely differ.

Fit verdicts by condition for each robot
Condition Mammotion Yuka 2000 Worx Landroid Vision …
Yard size
Under ¼ acre Good150-minute runtime easily covers under 0.25 acres in single pass. GoodA hands-on review ran it on a quarter-acre yard and found it very dependable.
¼ – ½ acrethey differ GoodOptimized for 0.25-0.5 acre residential yards; standard runtime covers in one session. DependsWorx rates 1 acre, but a hands-on review thinks the 5 Ah battery suits quarter-acre yards better.
Over ½ acre DependsBattery runtime caps at 150 minutes; yards over 0.5 acres may require two sessions or strategic dock placement. DependsWorx lists 1 acre, and no test of the WR340 on a yard over half an acre was found.
Terrain
Mostly flat GoodLevel terrain plays to vision-based navigation strength; optimal performance on flat residential yards. GoodA hands-on review found it cut its test yard consistently without hangups or technical snafus.
Gentle slopesthey differ DependsRated for up to 30% grade; moderate slopes work but reduce autonomy reliability and coverage consistency. GoodA hands-on review saw it manage moderate inclines, and front-wheel drive helped on rough patches.
Steep / hilly PoorRated for slopes up to 30 degrees maximum; steep or severely uneven terrain will trigger stuck conditions. PoorWorx rates it for 30% slopes, and a hands-on review advises care on steep hills.
Grass type
Typical lawn grass GoodPerforms well on typical residential lawn densities with moderate growth rates. GoodA hands-on review found the yard stayed well groomed across its cutting patterns.
Mixed / tall growth DependsTall grass above 4 inches obscures camera and LiDAR line-of-sight; performance degrades with thick vegetation. DependsNo test of the WR340 in long or overgrown grass was found.
Thick (Bermuda / Zoysia) DependsDense Bermuda or thick-growing grass reduces sensor clarity; vision-based mapping becomes less reliable. DependsNo test in thick or dense turf was found for its 8.7 inch cut.
Boundary setup
Wireless required GoodWireless vision-based boundaries are the Yuka's primary operating mode; works reliably with painted lines or virtual app fencing. GoodRTK Cloud virtual boundaries need no wire or antenna, per Worx and a hands-on review.
Wire required PoorThe Yuka is wire-free by design and does not support traditional boundary wire installation. PoorWorx lists RTK Cloud navigation with no boundary wire installation option.
No preference GoodWireless vision-based operation is native; no wire requirement, making it ideal for flexible boundary scenarios. GoodIts wire-free setup meets a buyer with no boundary preference.

A robot being poor for a condition is a fact about fit, not a fault. “Depends” means the record names a limit worth reading, not that the answer is unknown.

Keep going.

Robovations classifies robots; it does not rank them. Nothing on this page is a recommendation, and no manufacturer influences a classification or its placement here.