
- Autonomy
- IVEnvironmental
- Score
- Not scored
- Readiness
- Not assessed
- Price
- $2,999.99list

Up to three
All robot lawn mowers. Every figure below is placed against the whole class, so a gap can be read against how much the class itself varies.
The conditions each robot was assessed against, side by side. Rows marked in gold are where these machines genuinely differ.
| Condition | Kress KR282 EyePilot … |
|---|---|
| Yard size | |
| Under ¼ acre | GoodCapable but overkill for sub-quarter-acre yards. Simpler models adequate; RTK premium not justified. |
| ¼ – ½ acre | GoodKR282 designed for this range. One-charge coverage documented at half-acre; efficiency confirmed in field reports. |
| Over ½ acre | DependsSingle-charge coverage capped near half-acre. Large yards exceed one-session range; consider mulching or docking at midpoint. |
| Terrain | |
| Mostly flat | GoodRTK excels on flat terrain. 84% slope rating never needed, but mower performs flawlessly here. |
| Gentle slopes | GoodSlopes to ~60% handled confidently. 4WD traction and RTK positioning work in concert; no traction loss reported. |
| Steep / hilly | Good84% rated gradient addresses slopes where wire-free mowers fail. Wet grass and ice reduce grip; dry/moderate slopes reliable. |
| Grass type | |
| Typical lawn grass | GoodKentucky bluegrass, perennial rye, and typical lawn turf handled routinely. Baseline performance documented. |
| Mixed / tall growth | DependsInitial dense-growth passes may trigger vision hesitation. Plan light mulching pass before full autonomous operation. |
| Thick (Bermuda / Zoysia) | DependsBermuda or St. Augustine may exceed blade torque on steep terrain. Set higher cutting height initially; reduce over multiple passes. |
| Boundary setup | |
| Wireless required | GoodRTK-based wireless boundary is KR282 standard. No perimeter wire required; app-based setup in minutes. |
| Wire required | PoorKR282 is wire-free only. No perimeter-wire option available. Owners requiring wired boundary cannot use this mower. |
| No preference | GoodWire-free operation covers this option completely. KR282 works for any preference as long as wireless is acceptable. |
A robot being poor for a condition is a fact about fit, not a fault. “Depends” means the record names a limit worth reading, not that the answer is unknown.
A number only means something next to the spread it sits in. Each track is the real range across every classified robot in the class, with the median marked.
These robots share no measured specification with enough published figures to plot. That is a gap in the record, not a finding about the robots.
Written on each record, and the only thing here every robot on the site carries.
What each design gives up to be good at what it is good at.
Corrections come from Kress’s network rather than hardware you install, which removes the antenna but puts the boundary on 4G reception at the property. Where sky view is blocked by trees or buildings, the mower falls back to Vision Mode rather than stopping.
EyePilot’s handling is genuine and runs on the mower: stereo cameras with V-SLAM on a dedicated onboard AI chip, making decisions in real time. What Kress does with that imagery beyond the machine is not published in verifiable terms, so off-device retention is unverified rather than established either way.
Stated by the record itself. A robot being wrong for a household is a fact about fit, not a fault.
The upkeep ownership hands back to you, whatever the autonomy level says.
Classifications rest on different depths of evidence. A pre-release assessment and a verified one are not the same kind of claim.
| Robot | Evidence status | Sources reviewed | Last assessed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kress KR282 EyePilot 4×4 RTKn | Provisional | 3 | Sep 2026 |
Evidence status counts the sources behind a classification, not their kind. A high count can be maker documentation and price coverage, so read it as how much was reviewed rather than as independent testing. How we weigh evidence.
Robovations classifies robots; it does not rank them. Nothing on this page is a recommendation, and no manufacturer influences a classification or its placement here.
Comparing across classes is allowed — the page will switch to per-class positioning and tell you it has.