
Husqvarna
Husqvarna Automower 115H
- Autonomy
- IIAssisted
- Score
- 69/100Capable
- Readiness
- Ready Now
- Price
- $700list

Husqvarna

Stihl
Up to three
All robot lawn mowers. Every figure below is placed against the whole class, so a gap can be read against how much the class itself varies.
The conditions each robot was assessed against, side by side. Rows marked in gold are where these machines genuinely differ.
| Condition | Automower 115H | Stihl iMow 7 |
|---|---|---|
| Yard size | ||
| Under ¼ acre | Good115H runtime covers sub-1,000 sqft yards in one pass; well-matched to compact lots. | GoodOversized for small yards; covers efficiently but underutilizes runtime capacity. |
| ¼ – ½ acrethey differ | Depends1,000-2,000 sqft range is the 115H design target; 2,000 sqft edges the 60-minute runtime ceiling with one-pass coverage. | GoodIdeal deployment zone; systematic pattern and 420-min runtime cover this range in single session. |
| Over ½ acrethey differ | Poor60-minute runtime does not cover yards over 2,500 sqft in one mowing cycle; multi-pass operation required. | DependsRated 5,000 sq m (~1.24 acres), the top of the iMOW range; larger yards need a second machine rather than a larger one. |
| Terrain | ||
| Mostly flat | GoodOptimal operating condition; manufacturer specs and owner reports show consistent performance on level yards. | GoodFlat terrain is the baseline; iMow 7 excels without slope challenges limiting traction. |
| Gentle slopesthey differ | DependsRated to 20% slope per manufacturer documentation; steeper grades may cause traction loss and uphill stalling. | GoodRated to 45% gradient; moderate slopes are well within operating specifications per owner reports. |
| Steep / hillythey differ | PoorManufacturer documentation does not support operation above 20% gradient; owner reports document traction failure on steeper terrain. | DependsNear the 45% limit on wet grass, traction degrades; dry conditions perform better than wet. |
| Grass type | ||
| Typical lawn grass | GoodDesigned for typical cool-season and warm-season turf; perennial ryegrass, fescue, and Bermuda all perform within spec. | GoodStandard turf and lawn grasses are the design baseline; systematic mowing pattern optimized for normal growth. |
| Mixed / tall growth | DependsCutting deck height adjusts to 50 mm maximum; tall fescue and some native grasses may exceed cutting reach; multiple passes improve appearance. | DependsTall or overgrown grass may require multiple passes; blade wear accelerates with dense growth. |
| Thick (Bermuda / Zoysia) | DependsDense turf increases motor load and blade dulling frequency; weekly blade inspection recommended in high-density stands. | DependsThick Bermuda or St. Augustine grass reduces cut speed; may require reduced cutting-height settings or longer run-time allocation. |
| Boundary setup | ||
| Wireless required | PoorBuried boundary wire is mandatory; no GPS or wireless boundary option available on the 115H. | PooriMow 7 requires physical perimeter wire; no wireless virtual-boundary option available. |
| Wire required | GoodWire-based perimeter is the sole positioning method; perimeter installation (2-4 hours) is a standard prerequisite. | GoodPhysical perimeter wire is the required boundary system; installation is a one-time setup cost. |
| No preference | GoodWire-guided operation works for any boundary preference; no wireless requirement complicates setup decision. | GoodUses perimeter wire. Fits readers with no boundary preference; wire is required. |
A robot being poor for a condition is a fact about fit, not a fault. “Depends” means the record names a limit worth reading, not that the answer is unknown.
Nine inputs across three pillars, each weighted as shown and each scored so more is better. A robot can lead on one and trail on another, which is the point of showing them apart.
A number only means something next to the spread it sits in. Each track is the real range across every classified robot in the class, with the median marked.
Not compared, because fewer than two of these robots carry a published figure: Price.
Written on each record, and the only thing here every robot on the site carries.
What each design gives up to be good at what it is good at.
Wire confinement trades flexibility for reliability. Rewiring costs $200-500 per expansion; GPS-free positioning never strays but never adapts to layout changes without manual installation.
Wire installation is a permanent setup: any lawn reconfiguration requires physical wire relocation, unlike virtual-boundary or GPS-based alternatives.
Systematic mowing pattern reduces pass overlap compared to random-path alternatives, but the iMow 7 slows for what its ultrasonic sensors register and bumps the rest; it does not plan a route around a newly placed obstacle.
Stated by the record itself. A robot being wrong for a household is a fact about fit, not a fault.
The upkeep ownership hands back to you, whatever the autonomy level says.
Classifications rest on different depths of evidence. A pre-release assessment and a verified one are not the same kind of claim.
| Robot | Evidence status | Sources reviewed | Last assessed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Husqvarna Automower 115H | Provisional | 4 | Aug 2026 |
| Stihl iMow 7 | Pending | 5 | Aug 2026 |
Evidence status counts the sources behind a classification, not their kind. A high count can be maker documentation and price coverage, so read it as how much was reviewed rather than as independent testing. How we weigh evidence.
The full recordHusqvarna Automower 115HSpecifications, evidence, the Fit Check in full, and every tracked change.
The full recordStihl iMow 7Specifications, evidence, the Fit Check in full, and every tracked change.Robovations classifies robots; it does not rank them. Nothing on this page is a recommendation, and no manufacturer influences a classification or its placement here.
Comparing across classes is allowed — the page will switch to per-class positioning and tell you it has.