
Greenworks
Greenworks Optimow 15
- Autonomy
- IIAssisted
- Score
- 58/100Capable
- Readiness
- Ready Now
- Price
- Not tracked

Greenworks

Stihl
Up to three
All robot lawn mowers. Every figure below is placed against the whole class, so a gap can be read against how much the class itself varies.
The conditions each robot was assessed against, side by side. Rows marked in gold are where these machines genuinely differ.
| Condition | Greenworks Optimow 15 | Stihl iMow 6 EVO |
|---|---|---|
| Yard size | ||
| Under ¼ acre | GoodWell within the 0.37-acre coverage limit; capable, though a smaller-class mower may serve this lot equally well. | GoodRated to about 0.74 acres, well more coverage than a quarter-acre lawn requires; a smaller iMOW model would do the same job. |
| ¼ – ½ acre | GoodSits within the documented 1,500 m² (0.37-acre) ceiling; the Optimow 15 is rated for this size range. | GoodAbout 0.74 rated acres comfortably covers this range, with the 28 cm cutting width doing the work in fewer passes. |
| Over ½ acrethey differ | PoorCoverage limit is 1,500 m² (0.37 acres); yards over half an acre exceed the documented operating limit. | GoodA rated ceiling of about 0.74 acres reaches into this bracket, and long daily run hours extend coverage further still. |
| Terrain | ||
| Mostly flat | GoodFlat terrain is fully within operating envelope; no gradient concerns apply. | Good45 percent standard slope tolerance leaves comfortable headroom for flat terrain and level ground. |
| Gentle slopes | GoodRated for up to 35% gradient; moderate slopes are comfortably within documented operating limits. | GoodRated to 45 percent slope as sold, with the gradient kit raising that to 55 percent for steeper hillside sections. |
| Steep / hilly | DependsGreenworks specs the Optimow 15 at 35% maximum; sections near that limit warrant extra caution when grass is wet. | DependsGerman testers report it can be stranded on the smallest edges of steep ground even with the gradient kit fitted. |
| Grass type | ||
| Typical lawn grass | GoodRandomized mulching-cut pattern designed for standard-height turfgrass on a regular mowing schedule. | GoodThree free-swinging blades in a mulching cut handle typical turf grass with a clean, documented cut pattern. |
| Mixed / tall growth | DependsOvergrown grass above the blade design height may need a manual pre-cut before returning to regular automated sessions. | DependsThe mulching cut and free-swinging blades are built for regular turf; no coverage evidence addresses mixed or overgrown grass. |
| Thick (Bermuda / Zoysia) | DependsDense thick-blade turf can slow progress; frequent short-duration passes are the documented mitigation for this grass type. | DependsNo documented cutting-power or blade-speed data addresses dense Bermuda or Zoysia; the mulching design is built for standard turf. |
| Boundary setup | ||
| Wireless required | PoorThe Optimow 15 requires physical perimeter wire; no wireless or GPS boundary option is available on this model. | PoorThe EVO range is a buried boundary wire design; there is no wire-free or satellite option on this model. |
| Wire required | Good200 m of perimeter wire is included; the entire operating boundary is wire-defined, matching this setup. | GoodA buried perimeter wire is the entire boundary system here, backed by ultrasonic obstacle sensors inside that fixed line. |
| No preference | GoodThis model is wire-only; factor in the one-time perimeter installation before committing to this setup. | GoodBoundary is wire-only regardless of preference, with ultrasonic sensors and obstacle detection working inside the buried perimeter. |
A robot being poor for a condition is a fact about fit, not a fault. “Depends” means the record names a limit worth reading, not that the answer is unknown.
Nine inputs across three pillars, each weighted as shown and each scored so more is better. A robot can lead on one and trail on another, which is the point of showing them apart.
A number only means something next to the spread it sits in. Each track is the real range across every classified robot in the class, with the median marked.
Not compared, because fewer than two of these robots carry a published figure: Price, Charge time, Noise.
Written on each record, and the only thing here every robot on the site carries.
What each design gives up to be good at what it is good at.
Wire installation is the price of entry: the Optimow 15 delivers genuine unsupervised mowing, but only after the owner commits several hours to perimeter-wire layout and staking.
Randomized cutting works, but systematic GPS-based mowing completes large areas faster and with more predictable pass distribution; the Optimow 15 trades path efficiency for a lower price tier.
Three EVO generations in, STIHL still buries the boundary wire; anyone hoping the EVO name meant a move to wire-free navigation will not find it here.
The extra size and a slope rating up to 55 percent with the kit cost more than the 5 EVO, and dealer-set pricing makes the actual number hard to pin down before a quote.
German testers found a clean mulching cut, but also a documented failure mode: the machine can be stranded on the smallest edges of steep ground.
Stated by the record itself. A robot being wrong for a household is a fact about fit, not a fault.
The upkeep ownership hands back to you, whatever the autonomy level says.
Classifications rest on different depths of evidence. A pre-release assessment and a verified one are not the same kind of claim.
| Robot | Evidence status | Sources reviewed | Last assessed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Greenworks Optimow 15 | Pending | 1 | Aug 2026 |
| Stihl iMow 6 EVO | Provisional | 4 | Aug 2026 |
Evidence status counts the sources behind a classification, not their kind. A high count can be maker documentation and price coverage, so read it as how much was reviewed rather than as independent testing. How we weigh evidence.
The full recordGreenworks Optimow 15Specifications, evidence, the Fit Check in full, and every tracked change.
The full recordStihl iMow 6 EVOSpecifications, evidence, the Fit Check in full, and every tracked change.Robovations classifies robots; it does not rank them. Nothing on this page is a recommendation, and no manufacturer influences a classification or its placement here.
Comparing across classes is allowed — the page will switch to per-class positioning and tell you it has.