
Gardena
Gardena smart Sileno free 800
- Autonomy
- IIIConditional
- Score
- 65/100Capable
- Readiness
- Ready Now
- Price
- Not tracked

Gardena

Segway
Up to three
All robot lawn mowers. Every figure below is placed against the whole class, so a gap can be read against how much the class itself varies.
The conditions each robot was assessed against, side by side. Rows marked in gold are where these machines genuinely differ.
| Condition | smart Sileno free 800 | Segway Navimow i105N |
|---|---|---|
| Yard size | ||
| Under ¼ acre | GoodCoverage rated for up to 800 m² (8,600 sqft); quarter-acre yards fall well within range. | GoodSized for lawns under roughly a quarter acre, matching the i105N's entry-tier coverage rating in Segway's own specs. |
| ¼ – ½ acre | DependsUpper end of rated coverage; multiple dock zones or split scheduling may be required for consistent weekly cuts. | DependsCoverage tops out well under half an acre; expect multiple charge cycles or incomplete single-session coverage near that size. |
| Over ½ acre | PoorExceeds 800 m² rating. Manufacturer documentation does not address larger properties; runtime and battery capacity unspecified for boundary sprawl. | PoorRated coverage falls well short of half an acre; Segway markets the i108N, i110N or H-series for bigger lots. |
| Terrain | ||
| Mostly flat | GoodIdeal operating condition. Flat turf with firm ground optimizes GPS accuracy and traction. | GoodRTK-plus-camera navigation and front-wheel traction control are documented for level turf. |
| Gentle slopesthey differ | DependsRated for up to 25% gradient; 15-20% slopes perform reliably. Steeper sections may cause traction loss or GPS signal fade. | GoodSegway rates the front-wheel-drive chassis and off-road traction control for slopes up to 30%, covering most moderate residential grades. |
| Steep / hillythey differ | PoorAbove 25% gradient, traction failure and boundary-detection unreliability documented. Sidehilling on slopes above 20% produces GPS accuracy loss. | DependsDocumented slope tolerance tops out at 30%; yards with grades beyond that are outside the published rating, and Segway positions AWD H-series models for the steepest terrain. |
| Grass type | ||
| Typical lawn grass | GoodDesigned for standard residential turfgrass. Mulching blade and systematic navigation optimized for fine-to-medium blade grass types. | GoodDesigned for regular residential turf mowed on a frequent robotic schedule. |
| Mixed / tall growth | DependsBlade dulling accelerates in tall or coarse grass; more frequent replacement intervals expected. Manufacturer cadence based on standard mowing height assumption. | DependsAdjustable cutting height has a documented ceiling; overgrown grass from a missed schedule needs a manual pre-cut first. |
| Thick (Bermuda / Zoysia)they differ | DependsDense, thick grass increases blade stress and motor load; slower coverage and potential battery drain on single-pass schedules. Test in heavy-growth season before committing. | PoorSmall pivoting blades and a light, mow-often design are not built to clear thick, overgrown turf in one pass. |
| Boundary setup | ||
| Wireless required | GoodWire-free GPS geofencing is this mower's defining feature. No perimeter wire required; virtual boundary drawn via app. | GoodThe mower's entire design point is EFLS: RTK positioning fused with AI camera vision, with no buried perimeter wire at all. |
| Wire requiredthey differ | DependsThis mower does not support perimeter wire operation. If you prefer wire-based boundaries, older Sileno+ models (wired) offer that option with proven RTK availability on select tiers. | PoorThere is no wired-boundary option on this line; owners who specifically want a buried-wire system need a different mower. |
| No preference | GoodWireless GPS geofencing is the only boundary method available; no wire option. Works well for owners with no preference. | GoodAny boundary preference is satisfied since the i105N never requires a wire in the first place. |
A robot being poor for a condition is a fact about fit, not a fault. “Depends” means the record names a limit worth reading, not that the answer is unknown.
Nine inputs across three pillars, each weighted as shown and each scored so more is better. A robot can lead on one and trail on another, which is the point of showing them apart.
A number only means something next to the spread it sits in. Each track is the real range across every classified robot in the class, with the median marked.
Not compared, because fewer than two of these robots carry a published figure: Price.
Written on each record, and the only thing here every robot on the site carries.
What each design gives up to be good at what it is good at.
Satellite positioning here is corrected over the internet, not by an RTK base station. Published accuracy is roughly 10 to 30 cm, against the centimeter-level figures consumer RTK mowers from Segway Navimow and Mammotion had been selling at and below this price for two seasons before the Sileno free arrived. Canopy shadow degrades the fix; cloud does not.
Maintenance is seasonal, not absent. The mower mulches, so there is nothing to empty and no clippings to dispose of, but blades are a yearly consumable and the machine and its charging station both need winter storage.
Wire-free setup skips the trenching every boundary-wire mower requires, but it trades that convenience for RTK signal dependency that a buried wire never had to worry about.
Entry-tier coverage area: sized and priced for small, simple lots, not the acreage Segway markets its H-series line to handle.
Stated by the record itself. A robot being wrong for a household is a fact about fit, not a fault.
The upkeep ownership hands back to you, whatever the autonomy level says.
Classifications rest on different depths of evidence. A pre-release assessment and a verified one are not the same kind of claim.
| Robot | Evidence status | Sources reviewed | Last assessed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gardena smart Sileno free 800 | Pending | 4 | Aug 2026 |
| Segway Navimow i105N | Pending | — | Sep 2026 |
Evidence status counts the sources behind a classification, not their kind. A high count can be maker documentation and price coverage, so read it as how much was reviewed rather than as independent testing. How we weigh evidence.
The full recordGardena smart Sileno free 800Specifications, evidence, the Fit Check in full, and every tracked change.
The full recordSegway Navimow i105NSpecifications, evidence, the Fit Check in full, and every tracked change.Robovations classifies robots; it does not rank them. Nothing on this page is a recommendation, and no manufacturer influences a classification or its placement here.
Comparing across classes is allowed — the page will switch to per-class positioning and tell you it has.