Skip to content
Saved

ComparisonGardena smart Sileno free 800 and Segway Navimow i105N

Up to three

All robot lawn mowers. Every figure below is placed against the whole class, so a gap can be read against how much the class itself varies.

Where each one suits you.

The conditions each robot was assessed against, side by side. Rows marked in gold are where these machines genuinely differ.

Fit verdicts by condition for each robot
Condition smart Sileno free 800 Segway Navimow i105N
Yard size
Under ¼ acre GoodCoverage rated for up to 800 m² (8,600 sqft); quarter-acre yards fall well within range. GoodSized for lawns under roughly a quarter acre, matching the i105N's entry-tier coverage rating in Segway's own specs.
¼ – ½ acre DependsUpper end of rated coverage; multiple dock zones or split scheduling may be required for consistent weekly cuts. DependsCoverage tops out well under half an acre; expect multiple charge cycles or incomplete single-session coverage near that size.
Over ½ acre PoorExceeds 800 m² rating. Manufacturer documentation does not address larger properties; runtime and battery capacity unspecified for boundary sprawl. PoorRated coverage falls well short of half an acre; Segway markets the i108N, i110N or H-series for bigger lots.
Terrain
Mostly flat GoodIdeal operating condition. Flat turf with firm ground optimizes GPS accuracy and traction. GoodRTK-plus-camera navigation and front-wheel traction control are documented for level turf.
Gentle slopesthey differ DependsRated for up to 25% gradient; 15-20% slopes perform reliably. Steeper sections may cause traction loss or GPS signal fade. GoodSegway rates the front-wheel-drive chassis and off-road traction control for slopes up to 30%, covering most moderate residential grades.
Steep / hillythey differ PoorAbove 25% gradient, traction failure and boundary-detection unreliability documented. Sidehilling on slopes above 20% produces GPS accuracy loss. DependsDocumented slope tolerance tops out at 30%; yards with grades beyond that are outside the published rating, and Segway positions AWD H-series models for the steepest terrain.
Grass type
Typical lawn grass GoodDesigned for standard residential turfgrass. Mulching blade and systematic navigation optimized for fine-to-medium blade grass types. GoodDesigned for regular residential turf mowed on a frequent robotic schedule.
Mixed / tall growth DependsBlade dulling accelerates in tall or coarse grass; more frequent replacement intervals expected. Manufacturer cadence based on standard mowing height assumption. DependsAdjustable cutting height has a documented ceiling; overgrown grass from a missed schedule needs a manual pre-cut first.
Thick (Bermuda / Zoysia)they differ DependsDense, thick grass increases blade stress and motor load; slower coverage and potential battery drain on single-pass schedules. Test in heavy-growth season before committing. PoorSmall pivoting blades and a light, mow-often design are not built to clear thick, overgrown turf in one pass.
Boundary setup
Wireless required GoodWire-free GPS geofencing is this mower's defining feature. No perimeter wire required; virtual boundary drawn via app. GoodThe mower's entire design point is EFLS: RTK positioning fused with AI camera vision, with no buried perimeter wire at all.
Wire requiredthey differ DependsThis mower does not support perimeter wire operation. If you prefer wire-based boundaries, older Sileno+ models (wired) offer that option with proven RTK availability on select tiers. PoorThere is no wired-boundary option on this line; owners who specifically want a buried-wire system need a different mower.
No preference GoodWireless GPS geofencing is the only boundary method available; no wire option. Works well for owners with no preference. GoodAny boundary preference is satisfied since the i105N never requires a wire in the first place.

A robot being poor for a condition is a fact about fit, not a fault. “Depends” means the record names a limit worth reading, not that the answer is unknown.

Keep going.

Robovations classifies robots; it does not rank them. Nothing on this page is a recommendation, and no manufacturer influences a classification or its placement here.