
Gardena
Gardena smart Sileno free 600
- Autonomy
- IIIConditional
- Score
- 54/100Limited
- Readiness
- Known Issues
- Price
- Not tracked

Gardena

Up to three
All robot lawn mowers. Every figure below is placed against the whole class, so a gap can be read against how much the class itself varies.
The conditions each robot was assessed against, side by side. Rows marked in gold are where these machines genuinely differ.
| Condition | smart Sileno free 600 | MOVA LiDAX Ultra Gen 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Yard size | ||
| Under ¼ acrethey differ | DependsRated to 6,458 sq ft on paper, but a hands-on test of this exact model reports daily retrieval after failed satellite runs. | GoodReports rate it for lawns up to 1,000 m², about a quarter acre. |
| ¼ – ½ acrethey differ | Depends6,458 sq ft (0.15 acres) sits well below this bracket's quarter-acre floor, before Galaxus's daily-retrieval finding is even a factor. | PoorThe reported 1,000 m² rating stops at about a quarter acre. |
| Over ½ acre | Poor6,458 sq ft is the documented coverage ceiling; a half-acre-plus lawn exceeds it before the satellite-reception problems even become relevant. | PoorLots over half an acre are more than double the reported 1,000 m² rating. |
| Terrain | ||
| Mostly flatthey differ | DependsA hands-on test found GPS reception unreliable near the edges of the house even on level ground, unrelated to slope. | GoodFlat lawns sit well inside MOVA's 45% slope rating. |
| Gentle slopesthey differ | PoorNo slope rating is published, and the same test documents satellite reception failing near ordinary garden features on flat ground already. | DependsMOVA rates it for 45% slopes, and no independent slope test exists. |
| Steep / hilly | PoorNo slope rating is published at all, and independent testing already reports the satellite signal failing on flat, open ground. | PoorSteep slopes exceed MOVA's listed 45% maximum. |
| Grass type | ||
| Typical lawn grass | DependsTwo rear cutting discs handle typical turf grass, but no cutting height or blade specification is published for this model. | DependsNo independent cutting test of Gen 2 exists before its November 2026 release. |
| Mixed / tall growth | DependsNo cutting height range, blade-power figures, or mulching capability are published; nothing documents this model on mixed or overgrown grass. | DependsMOVA has not published a cutting height range for Gen 2. |
| Thick (Bermuda / Zoysia) | DependsNo cutting height, blade-power, or mulching specification is published for dense Bermuda or Zoysia; the rear-disc design is not detailed further. | DependsNo test of dense turf exists, and cutting-system figures are unpublished. |
| Boundary setup | ||
| Wireless requiredthey differ | DependsSatellite positioning replaces the wire, but a hands-on test of this exact model reports daily retrieval from the lawn. | GoodLiDAR and an HDR AI camera map the lawn with no wire or RTK station, per MOVA. |
| Wire required | PoorThere is no wired boundary option; positioning is satellite-only, with no perimeter wire supported as a fallback. | PoorThere is no boundary-wire mode; Gen 2 relies on UltraView 2.0 navigation. |
| No preference | GoodNo preference fits either way, though a hands-on test of this exact unit reports daily retrieval after failed satellite runs. | GoodWire-free navigation meets this preference with no perimeter installation. |
A robot being poor for a condition is a fact about fit, not a fault. “Depends” means the record names a limit worth reading, not that the answer is unknown.
A number only means something next to the spread it sits in. Each track is the real range across every classified robot in the class, with the median marked.
These robots share no measured specification with enough published figures to plot. That is a gap in the record, not a finding about the robots.
Written on each record, and the only thing here every robot on the site carries.
What each design gives up to be good at what it is good at.
Wire-free satellite positioning removes the trench-digging step, but independent testing of this exact model documents the owner retrieving it from the lawn every morning.
Rear twin-disc cutting trims the lawn edge the wire-guided SILENO models cannot reach, yet GPS reception is reported unreliable under small trees and near the house.
A published European price sits inside Gardena’s existing support range, though no US channel exists, so American buyers have no domestic warranty or parts path.
A separate edge module aims to end hand trimming, and its 0 cm claim comes from MOVA with no independent test yet.
A heat sensor guards the exposed edge blades, but how reliably it stops them has not been independently checked.
Stated by the record itself. A robot being wrong for a household is a fact about fit, not a fault.
The upkeep ownership hands back to you, whatever the autonomy level says.
Classifications rest on different depths of evidence. A pre-release assessment and a verified one are not the same kind of claim.
| Robot | Evidence status | Sources reviewed | Last assessed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gardena smart Sileno free 600 | Provisional | 3 | Sep 2026 |
| MOVA LiDAX Ultra Gen 2 | Pre-Release | 6 | Sep 2026 |
Evidence status counts the sources behind a classification, not their kind. A high count can be maker documentation and price coverage, so read it as how much was reviewed rather than as independent testing. How we weigh evidence.
The full recordGardena smart Sileno free 600Specifications, evidence, the Fit Check in full, and every tracked change.
The full recordMOVA LiDAX Ultra Gen 2Specifications, evidence, the Fit Check in full, and every tracked change.Robovations classifies robots; it does not rank them. Nothing on this page is a recommendation, and no manufacturer influences a classification or its placement here.
Comparing across classes is allowed — the page will switch to per-class positioning and tell you it has.