Skip to content
Saved

ComparisonGardena smart Sileno free 600 and MOVA LiDAX Ultra Gen 2

Up to three

All robot lawn mowers. Every figure below is placed against the whole class, so a gap can be read against how much the class itself varies.

Where each one suits you.

The conditions each robot was assessed against, side by side. Rows marked in gold are where these machines genuinely differ.

Fit verdicts by condition for each robot
Condition smart Sileno free 600 MOVA LiDAX Ultra Gen 2
Yard size
Under ¼ acrethey differ DependsRated to 6,458 sq ft on paper, but a hands-on test of this exact model reports daily retrieval after failed satellite runs. GoodReports rate it for lawns up to 1,000 m², about a quarter acre.
¼ – ½ acrethey differ Depends6,458 sq ft (0.15 acres) sits well below this bracket's quarter-acre floor, before Galaxus's daily-retrieval finding is even a factor. PoorThe reported 1,000 m² rating stops at about a quarter acre.
Over ½ acre Poor6,458 sq ft is the documented coverage ceiling; a half-acre-plus lawn exceeds it before the satellite-reception problems even become relevant. PoorLots over half an acre are more than double the reported 1,000 m² rating.
Terrain
Mostly flatthey differ DependsA hands-on test found GPS reception unreliable near the edges of the house even on level ground, unrelated to slope. GoodFlat lawns sit well inside MOVA's 45% slope rating.
Gentle slopesthey differ PoorNo slope rating is published, and the same test documents satellite reception failing near ordinary garden features on flat ground already. DependsMOVA rates it for 45% slopes, and no independent slope test exists.
Steep / hilly PoorNo slope rating is published at all, and independent testing already reports the satellite signal failing on flat, open ground. PoorSteep slopes exceed MOVA's listed 45% maximum.
Grass type
Typical lawn grass DependsTwo rear cutting discs handle typical turf grass, but no cutting height or blade specification is published for this model. DependsNo independent cutting test of Gen 2 exists before its November 2026 release.
Mixed / tall growth DependsNo cutting height range, blade-power figures, or mulching capability are published; nothing documents this model on mixed or overgrown grass. DependsMOVA has not published a cutting height range for Gen 2.
Thick (Bermuda / Zoysia) DependsNo cutting height, blade-power, or mulching specification is published for dense Bermuda or Zoysia; the rear-disc design is not detailed further. DependsNo test of dense turf exists, and cutting-system figures are unpublished.
Boundary setup
Wireless requiredthey differ DependsSatellite positioning replaces the wire, but a hands-on test of this exact model reports daily retrieval from the lawn. GoodLiDAR and an HDR AI camera map the lawn with no wire or RTK station, per MOVA.
Wire required PoorThere is no wired boundary option; positioning is satellite-only, with no perimeter wire supported as a fallback. PoorThere is no boundary-wire mode; Gen 2 relies on UltraView 2.0 navigation.
No preference GoodNo preference fits either way, though a hands-on test of this exact unit reports daily retrieval after failed satellite runs. GoodWire-free navigation meets this preference with no perimeter installation.

A robot being poor for a condition is a fact about fit, not a fault. “Depends” means the record names a limit worth reading, not that the answer is unknown.

Keep going.

Robovations classifies robots; it does not rank them. Nothing on this page is a recommendation, and no manufacturer influences a classification or its placement here.