Skip to content
Saved

ComparisonGardena smart Sileno free 600 and Ecovacs GOAT O1200 LiDAR PRO

Up to three

All robot lawn mowers. Every figure below is placed against the whole class, so a gap can be read against how much the class itself varies.

Where each one suits you.

The conditions each robot was assessed against, side by side. Rows marked in gold are where these machines genuinely differ.

Fit verdicts by condition for each robot
Condition smart Sileno free 600 GOAT O1200 LiDAR PRO
Yard size
Under ¼ acrethey differ DependsRated to 6,458 sq ft on paper, but a hands-on test of this exact model reports daily retrieval after failed satellite runs. GoodRated coverage of about 0.3 acre comfortably handles lots under a quarter acre in scheduled runs.
¼ – ½ acre Depends6,458 sq ft (0.15 acres) sits well below this bracket's quarter-acre floor, before Galaxus's daily-retrieval finding is even a factor. DependsRated coverage tops out near 0.3 acre, so only the low end of this bracket fits; larger half-acre lawns exceed the ceiling.
Over ½ acre Poor6,458 sq ft is the documented coverage ceiling; a half-acre-plus lawn exceeds it before the satellite-reception problems even become relevant. PoorRated to about 0.3 acre; lawns over half an acre exceed its mapped coverage ceiling.
Terrain
Mostly flatthey differ DependsA hands-on test found GPS reception unreliable near the edges of the house even on level ground, unrelated to slope. GoodFlat lawns are well within its drive and mapping envelope for scheduled mowing.
Gentle slopesthey differ PoorNo slope rating is published, and the same test documents satellite reception failing near ordinary garden features on flat ground already. GoodRated to 45 percent grade, so moderate slopes are handled without special setup.
Steep / hillythey differ PoorNo slope rating is published at all, and independent testing already reports the satellite signal failing on flat, open ground. DependsRated to 45 percent grade (about 24 degrees); very steep or wet slopes can reduce traction.
Grass type
Typical lawn grassthey differ DependsTwo rear cutting discs handle typical turf grass, but no cutting height or blade specification is published for this model. GoodStandard turfgrass suits the 22 cm deck and 3 to 8 cm cutting height on a regular schedule.
Mixed / tall growth DependsNo cutting height range, blade-power figures, or mulching capability are published; nothing documents this model on mixed or overgrown grass. DependsCutting height tops out at 8 cm, so very overgrown grass needs an initial trim before regular runs.
Thick (Bermuda / Zoysia) DependsNo cutting height, blade-power, or mulching specification is published for dense Bermuda or Zoysia; the rear-disc design is not detailed further. DependsThe 22 cm deck covers dense turf slowly; efficient mode helps but adds to total runtime.
Boundary setup
Wireless requiredthey differ DependsSatellite positioning replaces the wire, but a hands-on test of this exact model reports daily retrieval from the lawn. GoodWire-free by design: maps boundaries with LiDAR and a camera, no perimeter wire to bury or repair.
Wire required PoorThere is no wired boundary option; positioning is satellite-only, with no perimeter wire supported as a fallback. PoorNo perimeter-wire option; boundaries are set only through wire-free app mapping.
No preference GoodNo preference fits either way, though a hands-on test of this exact unit reports daily retrieval after failed satellite runs. GoodWire-free setup via LiDAR and camera mapping suits owners with no boundary preference.

A robot being poor for a condition is a fact about fit, not a fault. “Depends” means the record names a limit worth reading, not that the answer is unknown.

Keep going.

Robovations classifies robots; it does not rank them. Nothing on this page is a recommendation, and no manufacturer influences a classification or its placement here.