Skip to content
Saved

ComparisonGardena smart Sileno free 600 and Ecovacs GOAT A1600 RTK

Up to three

All robot lawn mowers. Every figure below is placed against the whole class, so a gap can be read against how much the class itself varies.

Where each one suits you.

The conditions each robot was assessed against, side by side. Rows marked in gold are where these machines genuinely differ.

Fit verdicts by condition for each robot
Condition smart Sileno free 600 Ecovacs GOAT A1600 RTK
Yard size
Under ¼ acrethey differ DependsRated to 6,458 sq ft on paper, but a hands-on test of this exact model reports daily retrieval after failed satellite runs. GoodRated up to 1,600 square meters, roughly 0.4 acre, so a sub-quarter-acre lot sits well inside its range.
¼ – ½ acre Depends6,458 sq ft (0.15 acres) sits well below this bracket's quarter-acre floor, before Galaxus's daily-retrieval finding is even a factor. DependsRated up to about 0.4 acre, with 1,280 square meters (0.32 acre) suggested; lots toward half an acre exceed it.
Over ½ acre Poor6,458 sq ft is the documented coverage ceiling; a half-acre-plus lawn exceeds it before the satellite-reception problems even become relevant. PoorStated maximum is 1,600 square meters, about 0.4 acre; lawns above half an acre are outside the rating.
Terrain
Mostly flatthey differ DependsA hands-on test found GPS reception unreliable near the edges of the house even on level ground, unrelated to slope. GoodFlat lawns sit well inside the stated 50 percent slope rating and the six-step cutting height range.
Gentle slopesthey differ PoorNo slope rating is published, and the same test documents satellite reception failing near ordinary garden features on flat ground already. GoodThe maker's 50 percent slope rating covers moderate grades; no independent slope test was reviewed.
Steep / hillythey differ PoorNo slope rating is published at all, and independent testing already reports the satellite signal failing on flat, open ground. DependsMaker states slopes up to 50 percent; no independent steep-lawn test was reviewed, so traction on wet steep grass is unverified.
Grass type
Typical lawn grassthey differ DependsTwo rear cutting discs handle typical turf grass, but no cutting height or blade specification is published for this model. GoodCutting height adjusts from 30 to 90 mm in six steps, which covers standard turf heights.
Mixed / tall growth DependsNo cutting height range, blade-power figures, or mulching capability are published; nothing documents this model on mixed or overgrown grass. DependsCutting height tops out at 90 mm, about 3.5 inches, so taller growth is beyond its stated range.
Thick (Bermuda / Zoysia) DependsNo cutting height, blade-power, or mulching specification is published for dense Bermuda or Zoysia; the rear-disc design is not detailed further. DependsNo independent test on dense or thick turf was found; the 33 cm dual-blade deck is the only stated cutting hardware.
Boundary setup
Wireless requiredthey differ DependsSatellite positioning replaces the wire, but a hands-on test of this exact model reports daily retrieval from the lawn. GoodWire-free: positioning comes from LiDAR-assisted RTK and vision, so no perimeter wire is installed.
Wire required PoorThere is no wired boundary option; positioning is satellite-only, with no perimeter wire supported as a fallback. PoorNo boundary cable is used; the lawn is bounded by satellite and vision positioning, so a wire-based setup does not apply.
No preference GoodNo preference fits either way, though a hands-on test of this exact unit reports daily retrieval after failed satellite runs. GoodWorks without any perimeter wire, which suits an owner with no boundary preference.

A robot being poor for a condition is a fact about fit, not a fault. “Depends” means the record names a limit worth reading, not that the answer is unknown.

Keep going.

Robovations classifies robots; it does not rank them. Nothing on this page is a recommendation, and no manufacturer influences a classification or its placement here.