
Gardena
Gardena smart Sileno free 600
- Autonomy
- IIIConditional
- Score
- 54/100Limited
- Readiness
- Known Issues
- Price
- Not tracked

Gardena

Ecovacs
Up to three
All robot lawn mowers. Every figure below is placed against the whole class, so a gap can be read against how much the class itself varies.
The conditions each robot was assessed against, side by side. Rows marked in gold are where these machines genuinely differ.
| Condition | smart Sileno free 600 | Ecovacs GOAT A1600 RTK |
|---|---|---|
| Yard size | ||
| Under ¼ acrethey differ | DependsRated to 6,458 sq ft on paper, but a hands-on test of this exact model reports daily retrieval after failed satellite runs. | GoodRated up to 1,600 square meters, roughly 0.4 acre, so a sub-quarter-acre lot sits well inside its range. |
| ¼ – ½ acre | Depends6,458 sq ft (0.15 acres) sits well below this bracket's quarter-acre floor, before Galaxus's daily-retrieval finding is even a factor. | DependsRated up to about 0.4 acre, with 1,280 square meters (0.32 acre) suggested; lots toward half an acre exceed it. |
| Over ½ acre | Poor6,458 sq ft is the documented coverage ceiling; a half-acre-plus lawn exceeds it before the satellite-reception problems even become relevant. | PoorStated maximum is 1,600 square meters, about 0.4 acre; lawns above half an acre are outside the rating. |
| Terrain | ||
| Mostly flatthey differ | DependsA hands-on test found GPS reception unreliable near the edges of the house even on level ground, unrelated to slope. | GoodFlat lawns sit well inside the stated 50 percent slope rating and the six-step cutting height range. |
| Gentle slopesthey differ | PoorNo slope rating is published, and the same test documents satellite reception failing near ordinary garden features on flat ground already. | GoodThe maker's 50 percent slope rating covers moderate grades; no independent slope test was reviewed. |
| Steep / hillythey differ | PoorNo slope rating is published at all, and independent testing already reports the satellite signal failing on flat, open ground. | DependsMaker states slopes up to 50 percent; no independent steep-lawn test was reviewed, so traction on wet steep grass is unverified. |
| Grass type | ||
| Typical lawn grassthey differ | DependsTwo rear cutting discs handle typical turf grass, but no cutting height or blade specification is published for this model. | GoodCutting height adjusts from 30 to 90 mm in six steps, which covers standard turf heights. |
| Mixed / tall growth | DependsNo cutting height range, blade-power figures, or mulching capability are published; nothing documents this model on mixed or overgrown grass. | DependsCutting height tops out at 90 mm, about 3.5 inches, so taller growth is beyond its stated range. |
| Thick (Bermuda / Zoysia) | DependsNo cutting height, blade-power, or mulching specification is published for dense Bermuda or Zoysia; the rear-disc design is not detailed further. | DependsNo independent test on dense or thick turf was found; the 33 cm dual-blade deck is the only stated cutting hardware. |
| Boundary setup | ||
| Wireless requiredthey differ | DependsSatellite positioning replaces the wire, but a hands-on test of this exact model reports daily retrieval from the lawn. | GoodWire-free: positioning comes from LiDAR-assisted RTK and vision, so no perimeter wire is installed. |
| Wire required | PoorThere is no wired boundary option; positioning is satellite-only, with no perimeter wire supported as a fallback. | PoorNo boundary cable is used; the lawn is bounded by satellite and vision positioning, so a wire-based setup does not apply. |
| No preference | GoodNo preference fits either way, though a hands-on test of this exact unit reports daily retrieval after failed satellite runs. | GoodWorks without any perimeter wire, which suits an owner with no boundary preference. |
A robot being poor for a condition is a fact about fit, not a fault. “Depends” means the record names a limit worth reading, not that the answer is unknown.
A number only means something next to the spread it sits in. Each track is the real range across every classified robot in the class, with the median marked.
Not compared, because fewer than two of these robots carry a published figure: Price, Runtime, Noise.
Written on each record, and the only thing here every robot on the site carries.
What each design gives up to be good at what it is good at.
Wire-free satellite positioning removes the trench-digging step, but independent testing of this exact model documents the owner retrieving it from the lawn every morning.
Rear twin-disc cutting trims the lawn edge the wire-guided SILENO models cannot reach, yet GPS reception is reported unreliable under small trees and near the house.
A published European price sits inside Gardena’s existing support range, though no US channel exists, so American buyers have no domestic warranty or parts path.
Going wire-free removes the boundary cable chore, and the stated 1,600 square meter ceiling, about 0.4 acre, becomes the limit on lawn size.
Obstacle recognition is documented as a feature; how it treats hoses, toys and animals is not established by the sources reviewed.
Stated by the record itself. A robot being wrong for a household is a fact about fit, not a fault.
The upkeep ownership hands back to you, whatever the autonomy level says.
Classifications rest on different depths of evidence. A pre-release assessment and a verified one are not the same kind of claim.
| Robot | Evidence status | Sources reviewed | Last assessed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gardena smart Sileno free 600 | Provisional | 3 | Sep 2026 |
| Ecovacs GOAT A1600 RTK | Pending | — | Oct 2026 |
Evidence status counts the sources behind a classification, not their kind. A high count can be maker documentation and price coverage, so read it as how much was reviewed rather than as independent testing. How we weigh evidence.
The full recordGardena smart Sileno free 600Specifications, evidence, the Fit Check in full, and every tracked change.
The full recordEcovacs GOAT A1600 RTKSpecifications, evidence, the Fit Check in full, and every tracked change.Robovations classifies robots; it does not rank them. Nothing on this page is a recommendation, and no manufacturer influences a classification or its placement here.
Comparing across classes is allowed — the page will switch to per-class positioning and tell you it has.