Skip to content
Saved

ComparisonElliQ 3 and Grillbot

Up to three

All specialty robots. Every figure below is placed against the whole class, so a gap can be read against how much the class itself varies.

What the score is built from.

Nine inputs across three pillars, each weighted as shown and each scored so more is better. A robot can lead on one and trail on another, which is the point of showing them apart.

Capability

Task completion16% of score
Does it finish the job it is sold to do, unattended
  • ElliQ 372
  • Grillbot45
18median 72 across 433 scored robots100
Coverage and navigation10% of score
Does it work the whole area, and hold that between runs
  • ElliQ 370
  • Grillbot25
0median 70 across 421 scored robots100
Edge-case recovery10% of score
Does it recover from the failures its category presents
  • ElliQ 360
  • Grillbot30
18median 52 across 320 scored robots100
Operating envelope4% of score
How far conditions can vary before performance drops
  • ElliQ 368
  • Grillbot35
28median 68 across 397 scored robots100

Dependability

Field failure rate16% of score
Documented hardware failures per owner-year
  • ElliQ 356
  • Grillbot91
6median 70 across 359 scored robots100
Software stability14% of score
Whether updates fix more than they break
  • ElliQ 365
  • Grillbot33
15median 65 across 342 scored robots100
Support longevity10% of score
Committed parts, service and updates, with dates
  • ElliQ 340
  • Grillbot73
0median 62 across 429 scored robots100

Ownership burden

Routine maintenance12% of score
Hands-on time it asks for in normal operation
  • ElliQ 3100
  • Grillbot64
22median 67 across 434 scored robots100
Consumables8% of score
Parts that must be bought to keep it working
  • ElliQ 354
  • Grillbot61
8median 69 across 434 scored robots100

Keep going.

Robovations classifies robots; it does not rank them. Nothing on this page is a recommendation, and no manufacturer influences a classification or its placement here.