
Dyson
Dyson R2 Nurovi Wash+Dry
- Autonomy
- IIIConditional
- Score
- Not scored
- Readiness
- New to Market
- Price
- $699.99list

Dyson

Roborock
Up to three
All robot vacuums. Every figure below is placed against the whole class, so a gap can be read against how much the class itself varies.
The conditions each robot was assessed against, side by side. Rows marked in gold are where these machines genuinely differ.
| Condition | R2 Nurovi Wash+Dry | Roborock S5 Max |
|---|---|---|
| Home size | ||
| Under 1,500 sqft | GoodLiDAR mapping and a 90-minute maximum run time, per Dyson, cover a compact floor plan in one charge. | Good150-min runtime covers under-1,500 sqft in one pass. Suitable for compact homes. |
| 1,500 – 3,000they differ | DependsDyson publishes a 90-minute run time but no coverage area per charge, so mid-size homes are unconfirmed. | Good150-min runtime handles 1,500-2,500 sqft homes. Multi-floor mapping available via separate dock runs. |
| Over 3,000 | Depends90-minute run time, 6.5-hour charge, and no published recharge-and-resume behavior for a home this size. | Depends150-min runtime is borderline for 3,000-4,000 sqft homes. Two cycles per day may be needed on high-debris homes. |
| Primary floors | ||
| Hard floors | GoodTwin-capture brush bar and suction pick up debris while the rotating pads wash hard floors in the same run. | GoodSingle retractable mop pad handles hard floors well. 10,000 Pa suction adequate for hard-surface debris. |
| Low / medium pilethey differ | DependsUltrasonic sensor detects carpet and adjusts suction; Dyson publishes no mop-lift figure for crossing rugs. | GoodMop pad is wide and handles low-pile carpet. Performance trails rotating dual-pad systems but is functional. |
| High pile / shagthey differ | DependsNo independent deep-pile test published, and Dyson does not state whether the wash pads lift clear of pile. | PoorSingle static pad is not designed for high-pile or shag carpet. Manufacturer documentation does not recommend. |
| Mopping needs | ||
| Vacuum only | GoodStrong vacuum; the mop lifts or detaches when not needed. | GoodVacuums first; the mop pad is optional. |
| Light mopping | GoodActive mopping system covers routine floors easily. | GoodFlat mop pad handles light, routine wiping of hard floors. |
| Frequent moppingthey differ | GoodPressure or rotating mop with self-wash is built for frequent mopping. | DependsA dragged pad freshens floors but lacks the pressure or scrubbing for heavy, frequent mopping. |
| You want to… | ||
| Empty bin myself | GoodThe dock empties the bin and washes the pads, so hands-on upkeep is lighter than this option allows. | GoodWeekly dust-bin empties and monthly LiDAR cleaning fit hands-on routines. Low-complexity dock requires no special skills. |
| Empty occasionally | GoodBin emptying every few months and occasional spare-part swaps are the main owner tasks Dyson describes. | GoodAuto-dock handles dust and water. Monthly mop pad and brush maintenance are the main hands-on tasks. |
| Set-and-forgetthey differ | GoodDock self-empties, washes pads at 167°F, dries them at 113°F and refills; bin rated up to 90 days. | PoorWeekly bin empties and monthly lens cleaning contradict hands-off operation. |
A robot being poor for a condition is a fact about fit, not a fault. “Depends” means the record names a limit worth reading, not that the answer is unknown.
A number only means something next to the spread it sits in. Each track is the real range across every classified robot in the class, with the median marked.
Not compared, because fewer than two of these robots carry a published figure: Noise.
Written on each record, and the only thing here every robot on the site carries.
What each design gives up to be good at what it is good at.
Corner reach is the whole reason for the triangle pads, and the only public demo never pointed them at a corner.
Ninety days between bin emptyings is Dyson’s internal test figure; Dyson itself says real intervals vary with debris, habits and floor type.
You are buying proven reliability at the cost of feature newness. The S5 Max’s simplicity is its strength; the Qrevo’s complexity adds capability you may not need.
Stated by the record itself. A robot being wrong for a household is a fact about fit, not a fault.
The upkeep ownership hands back to you, whatever the autonomy level says.
Classifications rest on different depths of evidence. A pre-release assessment and a verified one are not the same kind of claim.
| Robot | Evidence status | Sources reviewed | Last assessed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dyson R2 Nurovi Wash+Dry | Verified | 8 | Sep 2026 |
| Roborock S5 Max | Discontinued | 8 | Aug 2026 |
Evidence status counts the sources behind a classification, not their kind. A high count can be maker documentation and price coverage, so read it as how much was reviewed rather than as independent testing. How we weigh evidence.
The full recordDyson R2 Nurovi Wash+DrySpecifications, evidence, the Fit Check in full, and every tracked change.
The full recordRoborock S5 MaxSpecifications, evidence, the Fit Check in full, and every tracked change.Robovations classifies robots; it does not rank them. Nothing on this page is a recommendation, and no manufacturer influences a classification or its placement here.
Comparing across classes is allowed — the page will switch to per-class positioning and tell you it has.