
Dyson
Dyson 360 Vis Nav
- Autonomy
- IIIConditional
- Score
- 68/100Capable
- Readiness
- Ready Now
- Price
- $1,099.99list

Dyson

Ecovacs
Up to three
All robot vacuums. Every figure below is placed against the whole class, so a gap can be read against how much the class itself varies.
The conditions each robot was assessed against, side by side. Rows marked in gold are where these machines genuinely differ.
| Condition | Dyson 360 Vis Nav | Deebot T30 Pro Omni |
|---|---|---|
| Home size | ||
| Under 1,500 sqft | GoodCapable but exceeds typical need; a mid-tier LiDAR vacuum covers compact homes at half the price. | Good180-minute runtime covers under 1,500 sqft in one pass; standard mode sufficient. |
| 1,500 – 3,000 | GoodSingle-session coverage maps most homes in this range on standard mode. Multi-story layouts require two units. | GoodTypical range for this model; multi-room scheduling handles splits across two floors efficiently. |
| Over 3,000 | Depends65-minute runtime limits single-charge coverage; recharge-and-resume extends sessions but lengthens total cleaning time. Multi-story homes also require carrying the robot between floors. | DependsDeep cleans on 3,000+ sqft single floors require mid-session recharge; extends total time to 3-4 hours. |
| Primary floors | ||
| Hard floors | GoodVision mapping and obstacle avoidance perform well on hard floors; cleaning power is well-suited for sealed wood and tile. | GoodConsistent vacuum performance across sealed hardwood and tile; mopping results good on hard floors. |
| Low / medium pile | GoodHigh suction and the full-width brush bar perform consistently on low-pile carpet. Typical maintenance is weekly dustbin emptying. | GoodVacuum and mopping both perform well on low-pile carpet per owner reports. |
| High pile / shagthey differ | PoorOwner reports document marked suction loss on shag and high-pile carpet despite peak power. Not recommended for thick-pile environments. | DependsVacuum handles high-pile; mopping performance degrades significantly and owner reports show suction loss. |
| Mopping needs | ||
| Vacuum only | GoodVacuum-only robot — matches a vacuum-only need. | GoodStrong vacuum; the mop lifts or detaches when not needed. |
| Light moppingthey differ | PoorThis model has no mopping function. | GoodActive mopping system covers routine floors easily. |
| Frequent moppingthey differ | PoorNo mop at all; choose a vacuum-and-mop robot instead. | GoodPressure or rotating mop with self-wash is built for frequent mopping. |
| You want to… | ||
| Empty bin myself | GoodManual dustbin emptying every 1-3 runs suits owners comfortable with frequent maintenance. Weekly filter care is standard. | GoodWeekly dustbin/mop tank emptying and monthly pad swaps required; not fully hands-off. |
| Empty occasionallythey differ | DependsLacks self-emptying dock; suits mixed tolerance only if owners accept weekly-to-daily dustbin swaps depending on shedding rate. | GoodDock automation handles mop cleaning and air drying; weekly bin empty is all that is required for basic operation. |
| Set-and-forget | PoorNo self-emptying base. Manual dustbin handling every 1-3 runs conflicts with true hands-off operation goals. | PoorWeekly maintenance (dustbin empty, water refill) required; not a fully hands-off system. |
A robot being poor for a condition is a fact about fit, not a fault. “Depends” means the record names a limit worth reading, not that the answer is unknown.
Nine inputs across three pillars, each weighted as shown and each scored so more is better. A robot can lead on one and trail on another, which is the point of showing them apart.
A number only means something next to the spread it sits in. Each track is the real range across every classified robot in the class, with the median marked.
Not compared, because fewer than two of these robots carry a published figure: Noise.
Written on each record, and the only thing here every robot on the site carries.
What each design gives up to be good at what it is good at.
Premium price ($1,199) funds suction power and real-time obstacle detection, not dock automation. The dustbin remains manual: you are paying for cleaning power, not convenience.
Cleaning performance is strongest on hard floors and low-to-mid pile; owner reports show reduced effectiveness on shag and high-pile carpet despite the 65 air watt rating.
The dock eliminates manual mop rinsing, but introduces a 20-30 minute wash-and-dry cycle that conflicts with quiet household hours.
Ecovacs publishes up to 290 minutes in silent mode on hard floor, but that is a best case; raising suction toward the 11,000 Pa maximum shortens a charge substantially, and no runtime at that setting is published.
The automated dock adds convenience but brings its own upkeep, mop pads, dust bags and tank refills, that a budget vacuum does not carry.
Stated by the record itself. A robot being wrong for a household is a fact about fit, not a fault.
The upkeep ownership hands back to you, whatever the autonomy level says.
Classifications rest on different depths of evidence. A pre-release assessment and a verified one are not the same kind of claim.
| Robot | Evidence status | Sources reviewed | Last assessed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dyson 360 Vis Nav | Provisional | 6 | Sep 2026 |
| Ecovacs Deebot T30 Pro Omni | Provisional | 7 | Aug 2026 |
Evidence status counts the sources behind a classification, not their kind. A high count can be maker documentation and price coverage, so read it as how much was reviewed rather than as independent testing. How we weigh evidence.
The full recordDyson 360 Vis NavSpecifications, evidence, the Fit Check in full, and every tracked change.
The full recordEcovacs Deebot T30 Pro OmniSpecifications, evidence, the Fit Check in full, and every tracked change.Robovations classifies robots; it does not rank them. Nothing on this page is a recommendation, and no manufacturer influences a classification or its placement here.
Comparing across classes is allowed — the page will switch to per-class positioning and tell you it has.