Skip to content
Saved

ComparisonDyson 360 Vis Nav and Ecovacs Deebot T30 Pro Omni

Up to three

All robot vacuums. Every figure below is placed against the whole class, so a gap can be read against how much the class itself varies.

Where each one suits you.

The conditions each robot was assessed against, side by side. Rows marked in gold are where these machines genuinely differ.

Fit verdicts by condition for each robot
Condition Dyson 360 Vis Nav Deebot T30 Pro Omni
Home size
Under 1,500 sqft GoodCapable but exceeds typical need; a mid-tier LiDAR vacuum covers compact homes at half the price. Good180-minute runtime covers under 1,500 sqft in one pass; standard mode sufficient.
1,500 – 3,000 GoodSingle-session coverage maps most homes in this range on standard mode. Multi-story layouts require two units. GoodTypical range for this model; multi-room scheduling handles splits across two floors efficiently.
Over 3,000 Depends65-minute runtime limits single-charge coverage; recharge-and-resume extends sessions but lengthens total cleaning time. Multi-story homes also require carrying the robot between floors. DependsDeep cleans on 3,000+ sqft single floors require mid-session recharge; extends total time to 3-4 hours.
Primary floors
Hard floors GoodVision mapping and obstacle avoidance perform well on hard floors; cleaning power is well-suited for sealed wood and tile. GoodConsistent vacuum performance across sealed hardwood and tile; mopping results good on hard floors.
Low / medium pile GoodHigh suction and the full-width brush bar perform consistently on low-pile carpet. Typical maintenance is weekly dustbin emptying. GoodVacuum and mopping both perform well on low-pile carpet per owner reports.
High pile / shagthey differ PoorOwner reports document marked suction loss on shag and high-pile carpet despite peak power. Not recommended for thick-pile environments. DependsVacuum handles high-pile; mopping performance degrades significantly and owner reports show suction loss.
Mopping needs
Vacuum only GoodVacuum-only robot — matches a vacuum-only need. GoodStrong vacuum; the mop lifts or detaches when not needed.
Light moppingthey differ PoorThis model has no mopping function. GoodActive mopping system covers routine floors easily.
Frequent moppingthey differ PoorNo mop at all; choose a vacuum-and-mop robot instead. GoodPressure or rotating mop with self-wash is built for frequent mopping.
You want to…
Empty bin myself GoodManual dustbin emptying every 1-3 runs suits owners comfortable with frequent maintenance. Weekly filter care is standard. GoodWeekly dustbin/mop tank emptying and monthly pad swaps required; not fully hands-off.
Empty occasionallythey differ DependsLacks self-emptying dock; suits mixed tolerance only if owners accept weekly-to-daily dustbin swaps depending on shedding rate. GoodDock automation handles mop cleaning and air drying; weekly bin empty is all that is required for basic operation.
Set-and-forget PoorNo self-emptying base. Manual dustbin handling every 1-3 runs conflicts with true hands-off operation goals. PoorWeekly maintenance (dustbin empty, water refill) required; not a fully hands-off system.

A robot being poor for a condition is a fact about fit, not a fault. “Depends” means the record names a limit worth reading, not that the answer is unknown.

Keep going.

Robovations classifies robots; it does not rank them. Nothing on this page is a recommendation, and no manufacturer influences a classification or its placement here.