Comparison · 2 robots

Tesla Optimus Gen 2 · Zeroth Bridge

All humanoid robots. Every measure below is plotted against the full class, so a difference can be read against how much the class itself varies.

Tesla Optimus Gen 2
Zeroth Bridge

Tesla

Tesla Optimus Gen 2

Autonomy: IIAssisted Autonomy
Score: 38/100 Concept Stage
Readiness: Not assessed
Price: Not tracked

Zeroth

Zeroth Bridge

Autonomy: IIAssisted Autonomy
Score: 54/100 Plausible
Readiness: Not assessed
Price: $3,999list

Up to three

01 Classification

What each one does on its own.

The Autonomy Ladder is the same five rungs for every robot on the site. A rung describes the conditions a robot handles without you, not how good it is.

Generalized

Any task, any setting

Environmental

Handles new obstacles without help

III

Conditional

Finishes familiar jobs on its own

Assisted

Runs preset routines, needs rescue

Tesla Optimus Gen 2Zeroth Bridge

Manual

One action, on command

02 Assessment

Where they actually differ.

The Robovations Score is nine inputs across three pillars, each weighted as shown and each scored so that more is better. A robot can lead on one and trail on another, which is the point of showing them apart. Cost of ownership and data handling are reported on each robot's own page and are never averaged into the score.

None of these robots carries a scored assessment yet, so there is nothing to plot here. The classification and evidence below still apply.

03 Measured against the class

How far apart is a long way?

A number only means something next to the spread it sits in. Each track below is the real range across every classified robot in the class, with the median marked.

Height51 with a published figure

68 in34.7 in

Tesla Optimus Gen 268 in
Zeroth Bridge34.7 in

34.7 inmedian 66.9 in86.6 in

Not compared, because fewer than two of these robots carry a published figure: Price, Suction, Runtime, Charge time, Noise, Weight.

04 Ownership

What the numbers leave out.

The trade-off

What each design gives up to be good at what it is good at.

Tesla Optimus Gen 2

Vertical integration gives Tesla unmatched manufacturing leverage, but public evidence cannot yet separate autonomous capability from teleoperated demonstration.

Zeroth Bridge

$3,999 buys a biped with a published joint map and no published runtime.

Because control is replayed motion or live teleoperation, every new behavior is something a developer has to build.

Two weights on one page: about 10 kg in the header, about 13 kg in the spec table.

Who each one is wrong for

Stated by the record itself. A robot being wrong for a household is a fact about fit, not a fault.

Tesla Optimus Gen 2

Consumer or residential deployment: Tesla has not announced consumer pricing or availability for any Optimus generation. No retail path exists.
Commercial service robotics (hospitality, delivery, logistics): Optimus Gen 2 is not positioned as a commercial service platform. Task-specific performance and real-world reliability are undocumented.
Autonomous operation without remote pilot oversight: Extent of human-in-the-loop requirements and teleop fallback is not publicly detailed. Field operation liabilities are unaddressed.

Zeroth Bridge

Households expecting a robot that does chores: Launch materials list walking, squatting, dancing, backflips and obstacle avoidance as its built-in skills. None of the sources reviewed describes a household task such as tidying, fetching or laundry.
Buyers who need a firm delivery date: Zeroth's store calls the first batch a pre-order and names no ship window. Chinese coverage reports 1,000 JD.com units sold within a week without stating when they deliver.
Anyone wanting unattended operation around people or pets: Control runs through replayed motion or live teleoperation, and no fall-recovery or emergency-stop behavior is documented for a 13 kg machine that performs backflips.
Projects that need camera-based perception out of the box: The sensor list names an IMU, a circular microphone array and capacitive touch sensing and does not list a camera, although obstacle avoidance is advertised. Confirm the perception hardware before planning vision work.
Manipulation work needing heavy payloads or dexterous hands: The end effector is a two-finger gripper rated for 2 kg, on arms reaching 30 to 40 cm, which limits the platform to light, simple grasps.

What stays your job

The upkeep ownership hands back to you, whatever the autonomy level says.

Tesla Optimus Gen 2

As needed: No service program exists; Optimus operates only inside Tesla facilities with internal engineering support, and no maintenance documentation of any kind has been published.
As needed: Battery charging and pack management are internal to Tesla; capacity, charge time, and pack service life are unpublished.
As needed: Actuator and joint service falls to Tesla engineering; the Gen 2 hands and limbs have no published wear or replacement data.
As needed: Software and behavior model updates are pushed internally; no public firmware changelog exists.
As needed: No parts catalog, consumable list, or owner procedure exists; there is nothing an owner could schedule.

Zeroth Bridge

After every use: Recharge the pack; Zeroth lists a 12.6 V, 3.2 A charging input but no runtime or charge time.
After every use: Clear a flat area before walking or acrobatic routines, since fall recovery is undocumented.
As needed: Update the OpenBridge SDK and robot firmware as Zeroth releases builds.
As needed: Inspect joints and two-finger grippers after falls or backflips; no inspection interval is published.
As needed: Keep operation within the 32-104°F range Zeroth lists.

05 Evidence

How much each of these is standing on.

Classifications rest on different depths of evidence. A pre-release assessment and a verified one are not the same kind of claim.

Evidence behind each classification
Robot	Evidence status	Sources reviewed	Last assessed
Tesla Optimus Gen 2	Pre-Release	6	Sep 2026
Zeroth Bridge	Pre-Release	6	Sep 2026