Skip to content
Saved
Comparison · 2 robots

Miko 3 · Starship Delivery Robot

All specialty robots. Every measure below is plotted against the full class, so a difference can be read against how much the class itself varies.

  1. Miko 3
  2. Starship Delivery Robot
Miko

Miko 3

Autonomy
IIAssisted Autonomy
Score
52/100 Limited
Readiness
Ready Now
Price
$299list

Starship Technologies

Starship Delivery Robot

Autonomy
IIAssisted Autonomy
Score
90/100 Pre-Order Ready
Readiness
Not assessed
Price
Not tracked

Up to three

01 Classification

What each one does on its own.

The Autonomy Ladder is the same five rungs for every robot on the site. A rung describes the conditions a robot handles without you, not how good it is.

V
Generalized
Any task, any setting
IV
Environmental
Handles new obstacles without help
III
Conditional
Finishes familiar jobs on its own
II
Assisted
Runs preset routines, needs rescue
Miko 3Starship Delivery Robot
I
Manual
One action, on command
02 Assessment

Where they actually differ.

The Robovations Score is nine inputs across three pillars, each weighted as shown and each scored so that more is better. A robot can lead on one and trail on another, which is the point of showing them apart. Cost of ownership and data handling are reported on each robot's own page and are never averaged into the score.

Capability

Task completion16% of score
Does it finish the job it is sold to do, unattended
  • Miko 345
18median 72 across 433 scored robots100

Not scored: Starship Delivery Robot

Coverage and navigation10% of score
Does it work the whole area, and hold that between runs
  • Miko 325
0median 70 across 421 scored robots100

Not scored: Starship Delivery Robot

Edge-case recovery10% of score
Does it recover from the failures its category presents
  • Miko 330
18median 52 across 320 scored robots100

Not scored: Starship Delivery Robot

Operating envelope4% of score
How far conditions can vary before performance drops
  • Miko 350
28median 68 across 397 scored robots100

Not scored: Starship Delivery Robot

Dependability

Field failure rate16% of score
Documented hardware failures per owner-year
  • Miko 357
6median 70 across 359 scored robots100

Not scored: Starship Delivery Robot

Software stability14% of score
Whether updates fix more than they break
  • Miko 355
15median 65 across 342 scored robots100

Not scored: Starship Delivery Robot

Support longevity10% of score
Committed parts, service and updates, with dates
  • Miko 355
0median 62 across 429 scored robots100

Not scored: Starship Delivery Robot

Ownership burden

Routine maintenance12% of score
Hands-on time it asks for in normal operation
  • Miko 375
22median 67 across 434 scored robots100

Not scored: Starship Delivery Robot

Consumables8% of score
Parts that must be bought to keep it working
  • Miko 385
8median 69 across 434 scored robots100

Not scored: Starship Delivery Robot

03 Measured against the class

How far apart is a long way?

A number only means something next to the spread it sits in. Each track below is the real range across every classified robot in the class, with the median marked.

Weight39 with a published figure
  • Miko 32 lbs
  • Starship Delivery Robot50.7 lbs
0.1 lbsmedian 24.3 lbs2,646 lbs
Height36 with a published figure
  • Miko 38.7 in
  • Starship Delivery Robot21.8 in
0.9 inmedian 22.8 in82 in

Not compared, because fewer than two of these robots carry a published figure: Price, Suction, Runtime, Charge time, Noise.

04 Ownership

What the numbers leave out.

The trade-off

What each design gives up to be good at what it is good at.

Miko 3

The $299 price buys the hardware; the library that makes it worth talking to costs $180 a year.

A camera that makes video calls to a parent’s phone also means face and voice data leave the house, kept for up to three years under Miko’s policy.

Starship Delivery Robot

Remote-assistance layer sits behind a fleet Starship describes as operating at over 99 percent autonomy, with assistants on standby rather than driving. The dependency is real: the platform runs only in Starship-mapped service zones and is backed by staffed support that has to scale with the fleet. Starship does not break out how often that support is called, so the size of the human contribution behind the 99 percent figure cannot be checked.

Who each one is wrong for

Stated by the record itself. A robot being wrong for a household is a fact about fit, not a fault.

Miko 3
Families unwilling to pay an ongoing subscription
Without Miko Max, The Gadgeteer found only one module or story per section plus progress reports and time controls, which leaves little to play after the first week.
Children who mumble or are still learning to talk
The Gadgeteer found the conversational AI poor at understanding anything but clear speech and unable to answer many questions.
Homes without dependable Wi-Fi
Miko's FAQ ties games and educational content to a Wi-Fi connection, so a weak network removes most of what the robot does.
Households that want no camera or microphone near children
Face and voice data are collected; Miko's privacy policy keeps biometric data up to three years, although the camera and microphone can be switched off in the app.
Buyers expecting a robot that roams and explores rooms
It rolls on flat surfaces but builds no map, cannot dock itself, and showed no obstacle avoidance in The Gadgeteer's review.
Starship Delivery Robot
Consumer retail or unrestricted public sidewalk operation
Not available for purchase by individuals or small businesses. Operates only in Starship-managed fleet zones; unavailable for independent consumer use or ad-hoc delivery markets.

What stays your job

The upkeep ownership hands back to you, whatever the autonomy level says.

Miko 3
  • Daily: Recharge over the included USB-C charger; about 4 hours for 6 to 7 hours of play.
  • As needed: Shut the robot fully down between sessions, since standby drain can empty the battery overnight.
  • Weekly: Wipe the touchscreen and camera window with a dry cloth.
  • As needed: Install app and firmware updates, which can be lengthy during first setup.
  • Annually: Renew or cancel Miko Max, which carries most of the content library.
Starship Delivery Robot
  • Daily: Recharges overnight on Starship’s wireless charging installations inside its service zone; the company documents autonomous charging with no manual plug-in task.
  • As needed: Sensor and camera cleaning is carried out by Starship field staff; no interval is published.
  • As needed: Wheel and tire replacement is handled at Starship’s regional maintenance centers; parts are not sold to the public.
  • As needed: Cargo compartment cleaning and hardware repairs are performed by Starship staff within its managed zones.
  • As needed: Software updates are pushed fleet-wide by Starship; no user action exists.
  • As needed: There are no owner tasks at all: Starship does not sell robots or spare parts, and it publishes neither a service interval nor parts pricing.
05 Evidence

How much each of these is standing on.

Classifications rest on different depths of evidence. A pre-release assessment and a verified one are not the same kind of claim.

Evidence behind each classification
Robot Evidence status Sources reviewed Last assessed
Miko 3 Pending 4 Sep 2026
Starship Delivery Robot Not Consumer-Ready 4 Sep 2026

Robovations classifies robots; it does not rank them. Nothing on this page is a recommendation, and no manufacturer influences a classification or its placement here.