Labrador Systems
Labrador Systems Retriever
- Autonomy
- IIIConditional Autonomy
- Score
- 71/100 Promising
- Readiness
- Not assessed
- Price
- Not tracked
Comparison · 2 robots
Labrador Systems Retriever · Piaggio gitamini
All specialty robots. Every measure below is plotted against the full class, so a difference can be read against how much the class itself varies.
- Labrador Systems Retriever
- Piaggio gitamini
Piaggio Fast Forward
Piaggio gitamini
Up to three
01 Classification
What each one does on its own.
The Autonomy Ladder is the same five rungs for every robot on the site. A rung describes the conditions a robot handles without you, not how good it is.
V
Generalized
Any task, any setting
IV
Environmental
Handles new obstacles without help
III
Conditional
Finishes familiar jobs on its own
Labrador Systems RetrieverPiaggio gitamini
II
Assisted
Runs preset routines, needs rescue
I
Manual
One action, on command
02 Assessment
Where they actually differ.
The Robovations Score is nine inputs across three pillars, each weighted as shown and each scored so that more is better. A robot can lead on one and trail on another, which is the point of showing them apart. Cost of ownership and data handling are reported on each robot's own page and are never averaged into the score.
Capability
Task completion16% of score
Does it finish the job it is sold to do, unattended
35
- Piaggio gitamini35
18median 72 across 433 scored robots100
Not scored: Labrador Systems Retriever
Coverage and navigation10% of score
Does it work the whole area, and hold that between runs
55
- Piaggio gitamini55
0median 70 across 421 scored robots100
Not scored: Labrador Systems Retriever
Edge-case recovery10% of score
Does it recover from the failures its category presents
26
- Piaggio gitamini26
18median 52 across 320 scored robots100
Not scored: Labrador Systems Retriever
Operating envelope4% of score
How far conditions can vary before performance drops
60
- Piaggio gitamini60
28median 68 across 397 scored robots100
Not scored: Labrador Systems Retriever
Dependability
Field failure rate16% of score
Documented hardware failures per owner-year
48
- Piaggio gitamini48
6median 70 across 359 scored robots100
Not scored: Labrador Systems Retriever
Software stability14% of score
Whether updates fix more than they break
65
- Piaggio gitamini65
15median 65 across 342 scored robots100
Not scored: Labrador Systems Retriever
Support longevity10% of score
Committed parts, service and updates, with dates
36
- Piaggio gitamini36
0median 62 across 429 scored robots100
Not scored: Labrador Systems Retriever
Ownership burden
Routine maintenance12% of score
Hands-on time it asks for in normal operation
68
- Piaggio gitamini68
22median 67 across 434 scored robots100
Not scored: Labrador Systems Retriever
Consumables8% of score
Parts that must be bought to keep it working
69
- Piaggio gitamini69
8median 69 across 434 scored robots100
Not scored: Labrador Systems Retriever
03 Measured against the class
How far apart is a long way?
A number only means something next to the spread it sits in. Each track below is the real range across every classified robot in the class, with the median marked.
Charge time19 with a published figure
240 min120 min
- Labrador Systems Retriever240 min
- Piaggio gitamini120 min
30 minmedian 180 min360 min
Not compared, because fewer than two of these robots carry a published figure: Price, Suction, Runtime, Noise, Weight, Height.
04 Ownership
What the numbers leave out.
The trade-off
What each design gives up to be good at what it is good at.
Labrador Systems Retriever
It solves reaching by changing the kitchen: pallets attached to counters stand in for a grasping arm.
A consumer product on the reservation page, a care-provider service in practice.
Piaggio gitamini
Every outing re-establishes the follow lock from scratch: nothing is mapped or retained between trips, unlike a routed delivery robot.
Nothing carried or worn pairs it to a walker, but no leader means no delivery: the robot cannot run the route alone.
The lidded 20 lb bin frees both hands on a walk, but a 28 lb frame with no stair-climbing still gets carried up porches and building steps.
No charging dock: a 7-hour runtime on a 2-hour charge is a plug-in the owner performs after every outing.
Who each one is wrong for
Stated by the record itself. A robot being wrong for a household is a fact about fit, not a fault.
Labrador Systems Retriever
- Households hoping to buy one outright in 2026
- Labrador's availability page ties the consumer Retriever to Retriever Pro demand and gives no date. Its reservation page still quotes a delivery estimate for the second half of 2023.
- Homes where daily life spans two or more floors
- The Robot Report describes cliff sensors that detect stairs and drops, and no stair-climbing ability is published. One unit serves one floor, so items still need carrying between levels.
- Anyone needing loose objects picked up from floors or shelves
- Retrieval works only with prepared trays on installed pallets, as IEEE Spectrum described it. Nothing in Labrador's material describes grasping an arbitrary object.
- Loads heavier than 25 pounds across both decks
- Labrador lists 25 pounds as the carrying limit over two decks, and its launch release caps each retrievable tray at 10 pounds.
- Buyers who require a published data policy for camera devices
- Labrador's privacy policy, last updated December 2021, covers its website only. It says nothing about the robot's 3D camera imagery, home map or voice commands.
Piaggio gitamini
- Multi-floor buildings and stair access
- No stair-climbing and no elevator integration is documented, so moving between levels means carrying the robot. It will follow its user through buildings as well as along sidewalks; the constraint is vertical, not the surface.
- Autonomous operation with no person to follow
- The core function is following a person it has been paired with. It cannot perform independent cargo delivery or run scheduled unattended routes.
- Heavy cargo or multi-unit fleet operations
- 20-pound capacity limits scalability for freight centers. No fleet-management system or multi-robot coordination documented.
What stays your job
The upkeep ownership hands back to you, whatever the autonomy level says.
Labrador Systems Retriever
- Daily: Stage trays on the counter-mounted pallets before the robot is sent to fetch them.
- Daily: Keep the route to the self-charging dock clear; Labrador lists about 4 hours for a full recharge.
- Weekly: Wipe both decks and the trays that carry food, drinks and dishes.
- As needed: Keep passages at least 28 inches wide after moving furniture.
- As needed: Arrange service through the care provider or Labrador; no public parts or repair channel is listed.
Piaggio gitamini
- Weekly: Clear debris from the wheels and check the body for damage.
- Monthly: Wipe the camera and radar surfaces; tracking depends on an unobstructed view of the person being followed.
- As needed: Charge between outings; clean out the cargo bin.
- Service: Piaggio Fast Forward publishes no consumer service schedule and no parts pricing for the gitamini. Tires, battery and repair work go through the company directly.
05 Evidence
How much each of these is standing on.
Classifications rest on different depths of evidence. A pre-release assessment and a verified one are not the same kind of claim.
| Robot | Evidence status | Sources reviewed | Last assessed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Labrador Systems Retriever | Not Consumer-Ready | 10 | Sep 2026 |
| Piaggio gitamini | Provisional | 3 | Aug 2026 |
Add a robot
Comparing across classes is allowed — the page will switch to per-class positioning and tell you it has.