
iRobot
iRobot Roomba 105 Combo
- Autonomy
- IIIConditional
- Score
- Not scored
- Readiness
- Not assessed
- Price
- $369.99list

iRobot

Roborock
Up to three
All robot vacuums. Every figure below is placed against the whole class, so a gap can be read against how much the class itself varies.
The conditions each robot was assessed against, side by side. Rows marked in gold are where these machines genuinely differ.
| Condition | Roomba 105 Combo | Roborock S4 Max |
|---|---|---|
| Home size | ||
| Under 1,500 sqftthey differ | DependsNo runtime or coverage figure was verified, and no independent test of the Combo was found. | GoodRuntime and LiDAR mapping cover compact homes in a single charge; budget price suits smaller space owners. |
| 1,500 – 3,000 | DependsWithout a verified runtime or coverage test, homes this size are unconfirmed on one charge. | Depends110-minute runtime handles two-story or open-plan homes with careful zone planning; may need multi-session scheduling on full-carpet layouts. |
| Over 3,000they differ | DependsNo independent test of large homes was found, and runtime is unverified. | PoorRuntime caps at 130 minutes on eco mode; sprawling homes require manual multi-session scheduling or larger-capacity competitors. |
| Primary floors | ||
| Hard floorsthey differ | DependsiRobot claims improved suction, but no independent hard-floor pickup test of the Combo was found. | GoodTom's Guide found only 8.5% of hair reached the dustbin on hard floors, clumping around the brush roll and inlet instead. |
| Low / medium pilethey differ | DependsNo independent carpet test of the Combo was found, and mopping runs avoid carpet. | GoodTom's Guide measured 88-100% pickup of cereal, litter and dog hair on carpet; strong performance for a budget LiDAR vacuum. |
| High pile / shag | DependsNo independent high-pile test was found for this entry-level model. | DependsAt 2,000 Pa, suction trails S8-series flagships on thick, matted carpet; adequate for routine debris, not heavy buildup. |
| Mopping needs | ||
| Vacuum only | GoodVacuums first; the mop pad is optional. | GoodVacuum-only robot — matches a vacuum-only need. |
| Light moppingthey differ | GoodFlat mop pad handles light, routine wiping of hard floors. | PoorThis model has no mopping function. |
| Frequent moppingthey differ | DependsA dragged pad freshens floors but lacks the pressure or scrubbing for heavy, frequent mopping. | PoorNo mop at all; choose a vacuum-and-mop robot instead. |
| You want to… | ||
| Empty bin myself | GoodOwners willing to rinse pads and refill water will manage its upkeep, with or without the dock. | Good0.46 L bagless bin tips into the trash every one to two runs; no bag to buy, ever. |
| Empty occasionallythey differ | GoodWith the AutoEmpty dock, debris is handled for weeks, leaving mop care to you. | DependsBin empties every one to two runs, more frequent than 'occasional' implies; no auto-empty option exists for this model. |
| Set-and-forgetthey differ | DependsMopping runs still need the pad rinsed and water refilled by hand. | PoorNo auto-empty dock and no retrofit exists; the bin is emptied by hand every one to two runs. |
A robot being poor for a condition is a fact about fit, not a fault. “Depends” means the record names a limit worth reading, not that the answer is unknown.
A number only means something next to the spread it sits in. Each track is the real range across every classified robot in the class, with the median marked.
Not compared, because fewer than two of these robots carry a published figure: Runtime, Charge time, Noise.
Written on each record, and the only thing here every robot on the site carries.
What each design gives up to be good at what it is good at.
LiDAR and auto-empty at an entry price, with no independent test of the Combo yet.
No object recognition: with LiDAR, cliff sensors and a bumper but no camera, the S4 Max maps a room accurately and still drives into the cords, socks and pet messes that camera-equipped models identify and route around.
Stated by the record itself. A robot being wrong for a household is a fact about fit, not a fault.
The upkeep ownership hands back to you, whatever the autonomy level says.
Classifications rest on different depths of evidence. A pre-release assessment and a verified one are not the same kind of claim.
| Robot | Evidence status | Sources reviewed | Last assessed |
|---|---|---|---|
| iRobot Roomba 105 Combo | Provisional | 6 | Sep 2026 |
| Roborock S4 Max | Discontinued | 4 | Aug 2026 |
Evidence status counts the sources behind a classification, not their kind. A high count can be maker documentation and price coverage, so read it as how much was reviewed rather than as independent testing. How we weigh evidence.
The full recordiRobot Roomba 105 ComboSpecifications, evidence, the Fit Check in full, and every tracked change.
The full recordRoborock S4 MaxSpecifications, evidence, the Fit Check in full, and every tracked change.Robovations classifies robots; it does not rank them. Nothing on this page is a recommendation, and no manufacturer influences a classification or its placement here.
Comparing across classes is allowed — the page will switch to per-class positioning and tell you it has.