Skip to content
Saved

ComparisoniRobot Roomba 105 Combo and Roborock S4 Max

Up to three

All robot vacuums. Every figure below is placed against the whole class, so a gap can be read against how much the class itself varies.

Where each one suits you.

The conditions each robot was assessed against, side by side. Rows marked in gold are where these machines genuinely differ.

Fit verdicts by condition for each robot
Condition Roomba 105 Combo Roborock S4 Max
Home size
Under 1,500 sqftthey differ DependsNo runtime or coverage figure was verified, and no independent test of the Combo was found. GoodRuntime and LiDAR mapping cover compact homes in a single charge; budget price suits smaller space owners.
1,500 – 3,000 DependsWithout a verified runtime or coverage test, homes this size are unconfirmed on one charge. Depends110-minute runtime handles two-story or open-plan homes with careful zone planning; may need multi-session scheduling on full-carpet layouts.
Over 3,000they differ DependsNo independent test of large homes was found, and runtime is unverified. PoorRuntime caps at 130 minutes on eco mode; sprawling homes require manual multi-session scheduling or larger-capacity competitors.
Primary floors
Hard floorsthey differ DependsiRobot claims improved suction, but no independent hard-floor pickup test of the Combo was found. GoodTom's Guide found only 8.5% of hair reached the dustbin on hard floors, clumping around the brush roll and inlet instead.
Low / medium pilethey differ DependsNo independent carpet test of the Combo was found, and mopping runs avoid carpet. GoodTom's Guide measured 88-100% pickup of cereal, litter and dog hair on carpet; strong performance for a budget LiDAR vacuum.
High pile / shag DependsNo independent high-pile test was found for this entry-level model. DependsAt 2,000 Pa, suction trails S8-series flagships on thick, matted carpet; adequate for routine debris, not heavy buildup.
Mopping needs
Vacuum only GoodVacuums first; the mop pad is optional. GoodVacuum-only robot — matches a vacuum-only need.
Light moppingthey differ GoodFlat mop pad handles light, routine wiping of hard floors. PoorThis model has no mopping function.
Frequent moppingthey differ DependsA dragged pad freshens floors but lacks the pressure or scrubbing for heavy, frequent mopping. PoorNo mop at all; choose a vacuum-and-mop robot instead.
You want to…
Empty bin myself GoodOwners willing to rinse pads and refill water will manage its upkeep, with or without the dock. Good0.46 L bagless bin tips into the trash every one to two runs; no bag to buy, ever.
Empty occasionallythey differ GoodWith the AutoEmpty dock, debris is handled for weeks, leaving mop care to you. DependsBin empties every one to two runs, more frequent than 'occasional' implies; no auto-empty option exists for this model.
Set-and-forgetthey differ DependsMopping runs still need the pad rinsed and water refilled by hand. PoorNo auto-empty dock and no retrofit exists; the bin is emptied by hand every one to two runs.

A robot being poor for a condition is a fact about fit, not a fault. “Depends” means the record names a limit worth reading, not that the answer is unknown.

Keep going.

Robovations classifies robots; it does not rank them. Nothing on this page is a recommendation, and no manufacturer influences a classification or its placement here.