Saved

Comparison · 2 robots

Hexagon AEON · NEURA MiPA

All humanoid robots. Every measure below is plotted against the full class, so a difference can be read against how much the class itself varies.

Hexagon AEON
NEURA MiPA

Hexagon Robotics

Hexagon AEON

Autonomy: IIAssisted Autonomy
Score: 44/100 Concept Stage
Readiness: Not assessed
Price: Not tracked

NEURA Robotics

NEURA MiPA

Autonomy: IIAssisted Autonomy
Score: 57/100 Plausible
Readiness: Not assessed
Price: Not tracked

Up to three

01 Classification

What each one does on its own.

The Autonomy Ladder is the same five rungs for every robot on the site. A rung describes the conditions a robot handles without you, not how good it is.

Generalized

Any task, any setting

Environmental

Handles new obstacles without help

III

Conditional

Finishes familiar jobs on its own

Assisted

Runs preset routines, needs rescue

Hexagon AEONNEURA MiPA

Manual

One action, on command

02 Assessment

Where they actually differ.

The Robovations Score is nine inputs across three pillars, each weighted as shown and each scored so that more is better. A robot can lead on one and trail on another, which is the point of showing them apart. Cost of ownership and data handling are reported on each robot's own page and are never averaged into the score.

None of these robots carries a scored assessment yet, so there is nothing to plot here. The classification and evidence below still apply.

03 Measured against the class

How far apart is a long way?

A number only means something next to the spread it sits in. Each track below is the real range across every classified robot in the class, with the median marked.

These robots share no measured specification with enough published figures to plot. That is a gap in the record, not a finding about the robots.

04 Ownership

What the numbers leave out.

The trade-off

What each design gives up to be good at what it is good at.

Hexagon AEON

Hexagon has never shipped a humanoid before this one, so the 1,000-unit Schaeffler commitment is a bet on a first-generation platform, not a proven one.

The pilot replaces no job outright yet: on-site safety staff remain present at every documented deployment, which is supervision, not autonomy.

NEURA MiPA

Capability arrives through the Neuraverse app ecosystem, where a skill learned on one robot propagates to the others, but that also ties the task set to a manufacturer platform whose data handling NEURA has not published.

Two-armed manipulation on a wheeled base covers a broad task set, but no production cost or maintenance burden is yet documented; modular joint design may require frequent calibration and parts replacement.

Who each one is wrong for

Stated by the record itself. A robot being wrong for a household is a fact about fit, not a fault.

Hexagon AEON

Households or consumer buyers of any kind: AEON is not sold, priced, or available to individual consumers; every documented deployment is an industrial pilot partnership.
Buyers needing unsupervised, hands-off operation today: Every documented deployment runs with on-site safety staff present; no hands-off or unsupervised use has been shown.
Smaller operations wanting a single unit or short trial: The disclosed commitment is roughly 1,000 units with Schaeffler; there is no published path to a small-scale or single-unit order.
Buyers requiring a proven safety or reliability record: No independent safety certification, failure-rate data, or multi-year track record exists yet for this first-generation platform.

NEURA MiPA

Budget-conscious households: €9,999 entry point plus unannounced customization and accessory costs exceed typical consumer automation spend. Cheaper alternative platforms (vacuums, mowers) deliver narrower but proven capability at lower cost.
Fully autonomous, hands-off operation: Published task runs are manufacturer and show-floor demonstrations. NEURA's cognitive-autonomy positioning runs ahead of anything shown working unattended in an occupied home.
Shipping within 2026: No confirmed ship date published; 'global reservations' language signals Q1-Q2 2027 plausibility but carries production-delay risk common in first-time consumer platforms.

What stays your job

The upkeep ownership hands back to you, whatever the autonomy level says.

Hexagon AEON

Daily: Battery charging between shifts; no published downtime or hot-swap figures.
Weekly: Sensor and camera calibration checks by on-site technical staff.
Monthly: Software and behavior updates pushed via Hexagon’s fleet management.
Every 3-6 months: Actuator and joint wear inspection; no published parts-replacement cadence.
As needed: Wheeled-leg component service; no independent failure or repair data published.

NEURA MiPA

Daily: Empty the vacuum bin after cleaning runs; charge battery.
Weekly: Inspect joints and gripper surfaces for debris accumulation.
Monthly: Clean sensor windows.
As needed: Software updates and Neuraverse skill pack installation.
As needed: Module replacement if gripper or arm attachment fails.

05 Evidence

How much each of these is standing on.

Classifications rest on different depths of evidence. A pre-release assessment and a verified one are not the same kind of claim.

Evidence behind each classification
Robot	Evidence status	Sources reviewed	Last assessed
Hexagon AEON	Not Consumer-Ready	1	Sep 2026
NEURA MiPA	Pre-Release	4	Aug 2026