
Fourier GR-1
- Autonomy
- IIAssisted Autonomy
- Score
- 75/100 Promising
- Readiness
- Not assessed
- Price
- Not tracked
All humanoid robots. Every measure below is plotted against the full class, so a difference can be read against how much the class itself varies.


Up to three
The Autonomy Ladder is the same five rungs for every robot on the site. A rung describes the conditions a robot handles without you, not how good it is.
The Robovations Score is nine inputs across three pillars, each weighted as shown and each scored so that more is better. A robot can lead on one and trail on another, which is the point of showing them apart. Cost of ownership and data handling are reported on each robot's own page and are never averaged into the score.
None of these robots carries a scored assessment yet, so there is nothing to plot here. The classification and evidence below still apply.
A number only means something next to the spread it sits in. Each track below is the real range across every classified robot in the class, with the median marked.
Not compared, because fewer than two of these robots carry a published figure: Price, Suction, Runtime, Charge time, Noise.
What each design gives up to be good at what it is good at.
GR-1 walks and reaches to a marked position on its own; any task beyond that defaults to a human teleoperator.
Documented deployments name Chinese hospitals and European auto plants as sites, not tasks: Fourier publishes no task-level detail for either program.
No published battery capacity or runtime figure exists for the GR-1, so planning a multi-day deployment depends on terms set by the distributor, not Fourier.
Fourier’s decade of rehab-robotics experience explains why the GR-1 was engineered for safe human proximity, but gait training and patient spotting belong to the ExoMotus exoskeleton line, not to any documented GR-1 task.
$3,999 buys a biped with a published joint map and no published runtime.
Because control is replayed motion or live teleoperation, every new behavior is something a developer has to build.
Two weights on one page: about 10 kg in the header, about 13 kg in the spec table.
Stated by the record itself. A robot being wrong for a household is a fact about fit, not a fault.
The upkeep ownership hands back to you, whatever the autonomy level says.
Classifications rest on different depths of evidence. A pre-release assessment and a verified one are not the same kind of claim.
| Robot | Evidence status | Sources reviewed | Last assessed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fourier GR-1 | Not Consumer-Ready | 5 | Aug 2026 |
| Zeroth Bridge | Pre-Release | 6 | Sep 2026 |
Comparing across classes is allowed — the page will switch to per-class positioning and tell you it has.