Skip to content
Saved
Comparison · 2 robots

Flymo EasiLife Go 200 · Stihl iMow 6 EVO

All robot lawn mowers. Every measure below is plotted against the full class, so a difference can be read against how much the class itself varies.

  1. Flymo EasiLife Go 200
  2. Stihl iMow 6 EVO
Flymo (Husqvarna Group)

Flymo EasiLife Go 200

Autonomy
II Assisted Autonomy
Score
Not scored
Readiness
Ready Now
Price
Not tracked
Stihl

Stihl iMow 6 EVO

Autonomy
II Assisted Autonomy
Score
67/100 Capable
Readiness
Ready Now
Price
Not tracked

Up to three

01 Classification

What each one does on its own.

The Autonomy Ladder is the same five rungs for every robot on the site. A rung describes the conditions a robot handles without you, not how good it is.

V
Generalized
Any task, any setting
IV
Environmental
Handles new obstacles without help
III
Conditional
Finishes familiar jobs on its own
II
Assisted
Runs preset routines, needs rescue
Flymo EasiLife Go 200Stihl iMow 6 EVO
I
Manual
One action, on command
02 Assessment

Where they actually differ.

The Robovations Score is nine inputs across three pillars, each weighted as shown and each scored so that more is better. A robot can lead on one and trail on another, which is the point of showing them apart. Cost of ownership and data handling are reported on each robot's own page and are never averaged into the score.

Capability

Task completion16% of score
Does it finish the job it is sold to do, unattended
  • Stihl iMow 6 EVO76
18median 72 across 380 scored robots100

Not scored: Flymo EasiLife Go 200

Coverage and navigation10% of score
Does it work the whole area, and hold that between runs
  • Stihl iMow 6 EVO70
15median 70 across 370 scored robots100

Not scored: Flymo EasiLife Go 200

Edge-case recovery10% of score
Does it recover from the failures its category presents
  • Stihl iMow 6 EVO45
18median 50 across 287 scored robots100

Not scored: Flymo EasiLife Go 200

Operating envelope4% of score
How far conditions can vary before performance drops
  • Stihl iMow 6 EVO72
25median 68 across 345 scored robots100

Not scored: Flymo EasiLife Go 200

Dependability

Field failure rate16% of score
Documented hardware failures per owner-year
  • Stihl iMow 6 EVO62
6median 70 across 370 scored robots100

Not scored: Flymo EasiLife Go 200

Software stability14% of score
Whether updates fix more than they break
  • Stihl iMow 6 EVO0
15median 65 across 300 scored robots100

Not scored: Flymo EasiLife Go 200

Support longevity10% of score
Committed parts, service and updates, with dates
  • Stihl iMow 6 EVO72
0median 63 across 376 scored robots100

Not scored: Flymo EasiLife Go 200

Ownership burden

Routine maintenance12% of score
Hands-on time it asks for in normal operation
  • Stihl iMow 6 EVO62
22median 65 across 381 scored robots100

Not scored: Flymo EasiLife Go 200

Consumables8% of score
Parts that must be bought to keep it working
  • Stihl iMow 6 EVO80
8median 69 across 380 scored robots100

Not scored: Flymo EasiLife Go 200

03 Measured against the class

How far apart is a long way?

A number only means something next to the spread it sits in. Each track below is the real range across every classified robot in the class, with the median marked.

These robots share no measured specification with enough published figures to plot. That is a gap in the record, not a finding about the robots.

04 Ownership

What the numbers leave out.

The trade-off

What each design gives up to be good at what it is good at.

Flymo EasiLife Go 200

The Go adds app scheduling and weather-based adjustment over the EasiLife 200, but the boundary is still a buried wire with the install labor that implies.

At 6.1 kg and 57 dB(A) it is light and quiet enough for a small garden, though its 2,153 sq ft ceiling rules out anything beyond a compact lawn.

Bluetooth-only app control keeps the connection local with no cloud account required, but that also means no off-site scheduling or status checks once you leave the house.

Stihl iMow 6 EVO

Three EVO generations in, STIHL still buries the boundary wire; anyone hoping the EVO name meant a move to wire-free navigation will not find it here.

The extra size and a slope rating up to 55 percent with the kit cost more than the 5 EVO, and dealer-set pricing makes the actual number hard to pin down before a quote.

German testers found a clean mulching cut, but also a documented failure mode: the machine can be stranded on the smallest edges of steep ground.

Who each one is wrong for

Stated by the record itself. A robot being wrong for a household is a fact about fit, not a fault.

Flymo EasiLife Go 200
Anyone avoiding a buried perimeter wire
Flymo supplies 150 m of wire and 150 stakes because the boundary is buried-wire only; there is no wire-free version of this model in the EasiLife line.
Lawns larger than 2,150 sq ft
The rated coverage tops out at 2,153 sq ft, a fraction of a quarter-acre lawn; larger properties need a bigger model or a different mower entirely.
Owners who want off-site or cloud app access
App control runs over Bluetooth range only, with no cloud connection; there is no way to check on or schedule the mower once away from the house.
Stihl iMow 6 EVO
Anyone trying to avoid wire installation
Three EVO generations in, the boundary is still a buried wire with the install labor and repair risk that implies; no wire-free option exists in this line.
Lawns under a quarter acre
A rated ceiling of about 0.74 acres is well beyond what a small lawn needs; the 4 or 5 EVO covers that area at a lower price point.
Steep edges and corners at the lawn boundary
German testers document the machine getting stranded specifically at small edges, where its weight becomes an obstacle it cannot clear on its own without a manual reset.
Buyers wanting a transparent, published price
Pricing is dealer-set rather than list, which makes the real cost hard to compare against other autonomous mowers before requesting a dealer quote in person.
05 Evidence

How much each of these is standing on.

Classifications rest on different depths of evidence. A pre-release assessment and a verified one are not the same kind of claim.

Evidence behind each classification
Robot Evidence status Sources reviewed Last assessed
Flymo EasiLife Go 200 Provisional 1 Jul 2026
Stihl iMow 6 EVO Provisional 1 Aug 2026

Robovations classifies robots; it does not rank them. Nothing on this page is a recommendation, and no manufacturer influences a classification or its placement here.