X-Humanoid
X-Humanoid Tiangong 3.0
- Autonomy
- IIIConditional
- Pre-release
- 75/100Promising
- Readiness
- Not assessed
- Price
- Not tracked
ComparisonX-Humanoid Tiangong 3.0 and DYNA 2.1
DYNA Robotics
DYNA 2.1
- Autonomy
- IIIConditional
- Pre-release
- 74/100Promising
- Readiness
- Not assessed
- Price
- Not tracked
Up to three
Autonomy Ladder
- IManual
- IIAssisted
- IIIConditional
- IVEnvironmental
- VGeneralized
All humanoid robots. Every figure below is placed against the whole class, so a gap can be read against how much the class itself varies.
Where each one suits you.
The conditions each robot was assessed against, side by side. Rows marked in gold are where these machines genuinely differ.
| Condition | Tiangong 3.0 | DYNA 2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Where it operates | ||
| Home / residential | PoorHome is not a target scenario. X-Humanoid names guided tours and inspection, both commercial. | PoorSold only as a commercial deployment to businesses; no consumer purchase path or home installation exists. |
| Office / retail | GoodThe stated target: a services platform exists for tour-guide and inspection deployments, and the machine was demonstrated navigating a public venue. | GoodPurpose-built for hotels, laundromats and restaurants; already running paid shifts at named sites. |
| Warehouse / factorythey differ | DependsWhole-body fine manipulation is claimed and the joints carry 400 Nm, but no industrial task has been shown end to end. | GoodMaker also cites warehouse and fulfillment deployments with throughput and placement figures published. |
| Primary tasks | ||
| Household choresthey differ | PoorNo household task demonstrated, and no consumer route to one. | DependsHandles chore-like tasks such as folding and shelving, but only within a staffed commercial workflow, not general household chores. |
| Social / carethey differ | DependsCarries multimodal lip-movement detection and large-model voice interaction, and is pitched at guided tours. The interaction quality is undocumented. | PoorNo conversational, companionship or social-interaction capability is documented for this robot. |
| Specialized job | GoodOpen low-level interfaces, an open URDF and an open-sourced VLA training framework make this unusually usable as a research base. | GoodBuilt around one long-horizon commercial workflow at a time. Laundry, housekeeping or food service. Not general-purpose tasks. |
| Supervision needs | ||
| Fully autonomous | DependsAutonomous navigation through crowds was demonstrated without human intervention, but only at the manufacturer's own event. | DependsRuns unattended for a shift, but the maker's own Mean Time Between Interventions metric assumes periodic human help. |
| With oversight | GoodThe mode every published demonstration has actually run in. | GoodMatches its documented deployment: autonomous operation with on-site staff present at each launch site. |
| Teleoperatedthey differ | GoodPartner pilots are the delivery model, and the platform ships with deployment, business and data-collection tooling around it. | PoorNo teleoperation or remote-pilot mode is documented; the system is designed to run without a human driving it. |
| Timeline | ||
| Ready todaythey differ | PoorNot purchasable. No price, no ship date. | GoodAlready deployed and doing paid commercial work at hotels, laundromats and restaurants as of this launch. |
| Near-term (1–2 yrs)they differ | DependsA commercial services platform and named scenarios put this closer than most humanoids here. "Closer" is not a date. | GoodExceeds a near-term timeline. Deployments are running now, not projected for a future quarter. |
| Research phase | GoodAmong the most open humanoid platforms available: full low-level interfaces, open URDF, open-sourced control and VLA frameworks, optional x86 or Nvidia Thor compute. | GoodPast the research stage: this is a fielded commercial product, not a lab-only demo. |
A robot being poor for a condition is a fact about fit, not a fault. “Depends” means the record names a limit worth reading, not that the answer is unknown.
How much the claim can be trusted.
None of these has shipped, so they are assessed on track record, engineering plausibility and how the demonstrations match the claims.
Track Record35% of score
Has this maker shipped what it demoed before, on schedule, with the promised capability?
88
- X-Humanoid Tiangong 3.088
28median 66 across 85 pre-release records100
Excluded as unevidenced, so it is left out of the number: DYNA 2.1
Engineering35% of score
Are the demonstrated capabilities achievable in shipping form, or do they need breakthroughs not in evidence?
9168
- X-Humanoid Tiangong 3.091
- DYNA 2.168
35median 70 across 95 pre-release records100
Demo Match30% of score
What has been shown to work, against what is claimed in marketing.
6982
- X-Humanoid Tiangong 3.069
- DYNA 2.182
30median 66 across 95 pre-release records100
Published beside the number
Never averaged into it. These describe how much the maker has disclosed, not what the machine does.
| Tiangong 3.0 | DYNA 2.1 | |
|---|---|---|
| ReadinessShip-date specificity, pricing transparency, distribution and regulatory status. Published beside the number; never averaged in. | 35/100 | 40/100 |
| DisclosureHow much of the product is disclosed. Higher means fewer fundamental unknowns remain. Published beside the number; never averaged in. | 38/100 | 35/100 |
How far apart is a long way?
A number only means something next to the spread it sits in. Each track is the real range across every classified robot in the class, with the median marked.
These robots share no measured specification with enough published figures to plot. That is a gap in the record, not a finding about the robots.
What the numbers leave out.
Written on each record, and the only thing here every robot on the site carries.
The trade-off
What each design gives up to be good at what it is good at.
X-Humanoid Tiangong 3.0
An unusually open platform, with published low-level interfaces, an open URDF and open-sourced control and VLA frameworks, is not the same as an available one: everything needed to develop on this machine is published except a way to obtain it.
DYNA 2.1
The whole-body workflow is proven on laundry alone. Folding, sorting, shelving. While food prep and warehouse handling stay marketing claims until a second published demo backs them.
No published price, MTBI figure, or safety certification: a buyer evaluates this on one video and one named laundromat, not a spec sheet.
Who each one is wrong for
Stated by the record itself. A robot being wrong for a household is a fact about fit, not a fault.
X-Humanoid Tiangong 3.0
- Anyone who wants to buy one
- No price, no ship date, no consumer channel. Pilot and partner delivery.
- Household tasks
- Home is not a target scenario and no household task has been demonstrated.
- Anyone who needs independently verified autonomy
- The autonomous navigation shown so far was demonstrated by the manufacturer at its own events. The Ultra variant's track results, set under a rule forbidding remote operation, are the stronger evidence in this line.
DYNA 2.1
- Households wanting a personal home robot
- Sold and deployed only to commercial operators. Hotels, laundromats and restaurants. With no consumer purchase path or home installation documented.
- Buyers who need a published price or ship date
- No manufacturer-listed price, unit cost or standard sales channel has been published; deployments appear to be negotiated commercial placements.
- Deployments needing a proven multi-generation track record
- DYNA Robotics is a young manufacturer; the field record here traces to a small number of commercial sites, not years of shipped hardware.
- Sites requiring independently verified safety or reliability data
- No independent safety certification, incident record or third-party reliability testing has been published beyond the manufacturer's own launch materials.
What stays your job
The upkeep ownership hands back to you, whatever the autonomy level says.
X-Humanoid Tiangong 3.0
Not recorded for this robot.
DYNA 2.1
- As needed: Software and AI-model updates as DYNA Robotics revises the orchestrator and world-action model; no public update cadence documented.
- As needed: Swap between parallel-jaw grippers and dexterous hand end-effectors depending on the assigned workflow.
- As needed: Charging scheduled around shift breaks; no runtime or charge-time figure has been published.
- As needed: On-site technical support from DYNA Robotics for a commercial deployment; no owner-serviceable parts list has been published.
How much each of these is standing on.
Classifications rest on different depths of evidence. A pre-release assessment and a verified one are not the same kind of claim.
| Robot | Evidence status | Sources reviewed | Last assessed |
|---|---|---|---|
| X-Humanoid Tiangong 3.0 | Not Consumer-Ready | 3 | Aug 2026 |
| DYNA 2.1 | Not Consumer-Ready | 5 | Sep 2026 |
Evidence status counts the sources behind a classification, not their kind. A high count can be maker documentation and price coverage, so read it as how much was reviewed rather than as independent testing. How we weigh evidence.
Keep going.
The full recordX-Humanoid Tiangong 3.0Specifications, evidence, the Fit Check in full, and every tracked change.
The full recordDYNA 2.1Specifications, evidence, the Fit Check in full, and every tracked change.Robovations classifies robots; it does not rank them. Nothing on this page is a recommendation, and no manufacturer influences a classification or its placement here.
Add a robot
Comparing across classes is allowed — the page will switch to per-class positioning and tell you it has.