X-Humanoid
X-Humanoid Tiangong 3.0
- Autonomy
- IIIConditional
- Pre-release
- 75/100Promising
- Readiness
- Not assessed
- Price
- Not tracked
ComparisonX-Humanoid Tiangong 3.0
Up to three
Autonomy Ladder
- IManual
- IIAssisted
- IIIConditional
- IVEnvironmental
- VGeneralized
All humanoid robots. Every figure below is placed against the whole class, so a gap can be read against how much the class itself varies.
Where each one suits you.
The conditions each robot was assessed against, side by side. Rows marked in gold are where these machines genuinely differ.
| Condition | Tiangong 3.0 |
|---|---|
| Where it operates | |
| Home / residential | PoorHome is not a target scenario. X-Humanoid names guided tours and inspection, both commercial. |
| Office / retail | GoodThe stated target: a services platform exists for tour-guide and inspection deployments, and the machine was demonstrated navigating a public venue. |
| Warehouse / factory | DependsWhole-body fine manipulation is claimed and the joints carry 400 Nm, but no industrial task has been shown end to end. |
| Primary tasks | |
| Household chores | PoorNo household task demonstrated, and no consumer route to one. |
| Social / care | DependsCarries multimodal lip-movement detection and large-model voice interaction, and is pitched at guided tours. The interaction quality is undocumented. |
| Specialized job | GoodOpen low-level interfaces, an open URDF and an open-sourced VLA training framework make this unusually usable as a research base. |
| Supervision needs | |
| Fully autonomous | DependsAutonomous navigation through crowds was demonstrated without human intervention, but only at the manufacturer's own event. |
| With oversight | GoodThe mode every published demonstration has actually run in. |
| Teleoperated | GoodPartner pilots are the delivery model, and the platform ships with deployment, business and data-collection tooling around it. |
| Timeline | |
| Ready today | PoorNot purchasable. No price, no ship date. |
| Near-term (1–2 yrs) | DependsA commercial services platform and named scenarios put this closer than most humanoids here. "Closer" is not a date. |
| Research phase | GoodAmong the most open humanoid platforms available: full low-level interfaces, open URDF, open-sourced control and VLA frameworks, optional x86 or Nvidia Thor compute. |
A robot being poor for a condition is a fact about fit, not a fault. “Depends” means the record names a limit worth reading, not that the answer is unknown.
How much the claim can be trusted.
None of these has shipped, so they are assessed on track record, engineering plausibility and how the demonstrations match the claims.
Track Record35% of score
Has this maker shipped what it demoed before, on schedule, with the promised capability?
88
- X-Humanoid Tiangong 3.088
28median 66 across 85 pre-release records100
Engineering35% of score
Are the demonstrated capabilities achievable in shipping form, or do they need breakthroughs not in evidence?
91
- X-Humanoid Tiangong 3.091
35median 70 across 95 pre-release records100
Demo Match30% of score
What has been shown to work, against what is claimed in marketing.
69
- X-Humanoid Tiangong 3.069
30median 66 across 95 pre-release records100
Published beside the number
Never averaged into it. These describe how much the maker has disclosed, not what the machine does.
| Tiangong 3.0 | |
|---|---|
| ReadinessShip-date specificity, pricing transparency, distribution and regulatory status. Published beside the number; never averaged in. | 35/100 |
| DisclosureHow much of the product is disclosed. Higher means fewer fundamental unknowns remain. Published beside the number; never averaged in. | 38/100 |
How far apart is a long way?
A number only means something next to the spread it sits in. Each track is the real range across every classified robot in the class, with the median marked.
These robots share no measured specification with enough published figures to plot. That is a gap in the record, not a finding about the robots.
What the numbers leave out.
Written on each record, and the only thing here every robot on the site carries.
The trade-off
What each design gives up to be good at what it is good at.
X-Humanoid Tiangong 3.0
An unusually open platform, with published low-level interfaces, an open URDF and open-sourced control and VLA frameworks, is not the same as an available one: everything needed to develop on this machine is published except a way to obtain it.
Who each one is wrong for
Stated by the record itself. A robot being wrong for a household is a fact about fit, not a fault.
X-Humanoid Tiangong 3.0
- Anyone who wants to buy one
- No price, no ship date, no consumer channel. Pilot and partner delivery.
- Household tasks
- Home is not a target scenario and no household task has been demonstrated.
- Anyone who needs independently verified autonomy
- The autonomous navigation shown so far was demonstrated by the manufacturer at its own events. The Ultra variant's track results, set under a rule forbidding remote operation, are the stronger evidence in this line.
How much each of these is standing on.
Classifications rest on different depths of evidence. A pre-release assessment and a verified one are not the same kind of claim.
| Robot | Evidence status | Sources reviewed | Last assessed |
|---|---|---|---|
| X-Humanoid Tiangong 3.0 | Not Consumer-Ready | 3 | Aug 2026 |
Evidence status counts the sources behind a classification, not their kind. A high count can be maker documentation and price coverage, so read it as how much was reviewed rather than as independent testing. How we weigh evidence.
Keep going.
Robovations classifies robots; it does not rank them. Nothing on this page is a recommendation, and no manufacturer influences a classification or its placement here.
Add a robot
Comparing across classes is allowed — the page will switch to per-class positioning and tell you it has.