Skip to content
Robovations
Robovations™
Robot Autonomy, Classified
Saved

ComparisonWorx Landroid Vision Cloud WR310 and TerraMow V1000

Up to three

All robot lawn mowers. Every figure below is placed against the whole class, so a gap can be read against how much the class itself varies.

Where each one suits you.

The conditions each robot was assessed against, side by side. Rows marked in gold are where these machines genuinely differ.

Fit verdicts by condition for each robot
Condition Worx Landroid Vision … TerraMow V1000
Yard size
Under ¼ acre GoodQuarter-acre rating matches this size, with RTK cloud positioning and camera V-SLAM holding shaded corners. GoodManufacturer-rated coverage of up to 1,200 sq m (about 0.3 acre) comfortably covers lots under a quarter acre.
¼ – ½ acrethey differ PoorRated to a quarter-acre ceiling; the WR320 sibling covers up to half an acre instead. DependsRated coverage tops out around 0.3 acre, so only the low end of this bracket fits; larger yards in this range exceed the documented maximum.
Over ½ acre PoorQuarter-acre max area rating falls well short of this range; a larger Worx model is needed. PoorManufacturer-rated maximum coverage (about 0.3 acre) falls well short of yards over half an acre.
Terrain
Mostly flat GoodHandles flat ground well within its 30 percent slope rating, camera V-SLAM holding position without a wire. GoodFlat terrain is the baseline condition camera-based vision navigation is documented to handle without added positioning uncertainty.
Gentle slopes Good30 percent slope rating (17 degrees) comfortably covers gentle grades with no reported traction loss. GoodManufacturer specifications rate a maximum operating slope of 18 degrees (about 32.5% grade), covering typical moderate terrain.
Steep / hillythey differ DependsSlope cap is 30 percent (17 degrees), documented as modest against camera-and-LiDAR competitors; may not hold true hillside grades. PoorThe manufacturer's rated maximum slope is 18 degrees; grades commonly described as steep exceed this documented limit.
Grass type
Typical lawn grass GoodCutting range of 1.57 to 3.54 inches and a 3-blade Cut-to-Zero deck suit typical turfgrass without extra passes. GoodStandard turfgrass mowed on a routine schedule is the baseline case for rotary-blade robotic mowers like the V1000.
Mixed / tall growth DependsNo published guidance for overgrown growth; camera-based grass classification may struggle distinguishing mixed-height turf from bare ground. DependsManufacturer guidance for this mower class discourages long gaps between cuts; overgrown grass risks jamming the blade and vision system.
Thick (Bermuda / Zoysia) DependsNo independent test of dense Bermuda or Zoysia turf performance exists; the 1.57 to 3.54 inch cutting range is manufacturer-published only. DependsDense or wiry turf typically needs more frequent passes from a single fixed-speed rotary blade; no V1000-specific thick-turf test was found.
Boundary setup
Wireless required GoodRTK cloud positioning plus camera V-SLAM eliminates the wire entirely, the model's whole design premise. GoodThe V1000 is built entirely around camera-based, wire-free boundary mapping through an app-guided walk, matching this directly.
Wire required PoorNo boundary-wire input exists on this model; RTK cloud plus V-SLAM is the only navigation method. PoorNo buried perimeter wire input is documented for the V1000; it operates as a wire-free, vision-navigated mower only.
No preference GoodNo preference stated; the WR310's cloud RTK plus V-SLAM system means the reader's choice doesn't change the fit. GoodA reader with no boundary preference is served by the V1000's wire-free camera mapping, with nothing to trench or bury.

A robot being poor for a condition is a fact about fit, not a fault. “Depends” means the record names a limit worth reading, not that the answer is unknown.

Keep going.

The full recordWorx Landroid Vision Cloud WR310Specifications, evidence, the Fit Check in full, and every tracked change.The full recordTerraMow V1000Specifications, evidence, the Fit Check in full, and every tracked change.

Robovations classifies robots; it does not rank them. Nothing on this page is a recommendation, and no manufacturer influences a classification or its placement here.