Skip to content
Saved

ComparisonSegway Navimow H5 Pro and Husqvarna Automower 312V

Up to three

All robot lawn mowers. Every figure below is placed against the whole class, so a gap can be read against how much the class itself varies.

Where each one suits you.

The conditions each robot was assessed against, side by side. Rows marked in gold are where these machines genuinely differ.

Fit verdicts by condition for each robot
Condition Segway Navimow H5 Pro Automower 312V
Yard size
Under ¼ acre GoodSized for larger acreage generally handles a compact lot; specific coverage figures remain unpublished by Segway. GoodRated for 1,200 m², a little more than a quarter acre, so smaller lawns are covered.
¼ – ½ acre DependsNo published max-area figure confirms mid-size coverage; Segway has not stated the H5 Pro's rated limit. DependsHusqvarna's 1,200 m² rating covers only the smaller end of a quarter to half acre.
Over ½ acrethey differ DependsMaximum rated area is undisclosed as of the September 2026 unveiling; suitability for larger yards is unconfirmed. PoorLawns over half an acre are well beyond Husqvarna's 1,200 m² rating for the 312V.
Terrain
Mostly flat GoodFlat turf sits well within any RTK mower's baseline capability; no caveats apply here. GoodA hands-on review found the cut quality excellent once the mower was configured on its lawns.
Gentle slopes GoodWell within the claimed 80% (38.6 degree) slope rating, though that figure is unverified outside the IFA demo. GoodT3's lawn is far from flat after mole damage, and the 312V coped with it well.
Steep / hilly DependsSegway claims slopes up to 80% (38.6 degrees), but this rating has not been independently tested. DependsHusqvarna rates 40% inside the lawn but 15% at the boundary, and no steep test was found.
Grass type
Typical lawn grass GoodStandard turf is the baseline case any robotic mower in this class is built to handle. GoodA hands-on review rated the cut quality excellent and the cutting options highly versatile.
Mixed / tall growth DependsCutting height range has not been published; performance on overgrown or tall grass is unconfirmed. DependsHusqvarna lists spiral cutting for uneven growth, but no long-grass test of the 312V was found.
Thick (Bermuda / Zoysia) DependsBlade system and cutting height details are undisclosed; dense turf performance is unconfirmed at this stage. DependsNo test in thick or dense turf was found for its 22 cm cut.
Boundary setup
Wireless required GoodLiDAR, NRTK and vision-based navigation form a virtual-boundary system, the same wire-free approach as Segway's existing Navimow line. GoodVirtual boundaries are set in the app, with no perimeter wire to lay.
Wire required PoorNavigation is built entirely on LiDAR, NRTK and cameras; no wire-based boundary option has been described. PoorHusqvarna lists virtual boundaries as the only boundary type, so there is no wired installation.
No preference GoodThe wire-free virtual-boundary system covers this preference without requiring any installation choice. GoodIts wire-free setup meets a no-preference buyer, provided Wi-Fi and open sky cover the lawn.

A robot being poor for a condition is a fact about fit, not a fault. “Depends” means the record names a limit worth reading, not that the answer is unknown.

Keep going.

Robovations classifies robots; it does not rank them. Nothing on this page is a recommendation, and no manufacturer influences a classification or its placement here.