Roidmi
ROIDMI EVA
- Autonomy
- IIIConditional
- Score
- 51/100Limited
- Readiness
- Known Issues
- Price
- $899list
ComparisonROIDMI EVA
Up to three
Autonomy Ladder
- IManual
- IIAssisted
- IIIConditional
- IVEnvironmental
- VGeneralized
All robot vacuums. Every figure below is placed against the whole class, so a gap can be read against how much the class itself varies.
Where each one suits you.
The conditions each robot was assessed against, side by side. Rows marked in gold are where these machines genuinely differ.
| Condition | ROIDMI EVA |
|---|---|
| Home size | |
| Under 1,500 sqft | GoodA 220-minute runtime clears space this size before the reviewed dustbin capacity issue becomes a factor. |
| 1,500 – 3,000 | DependsA 220-minute runtime may need a recharge cycle here, and an independent review found mop-pad drying ineffective afterward. |
| Over 3,000 | PoorAn independent review found the bin can't finish a full-floor clean this large without manual emptying partway through. |
| Primary floors | |
| Hard floors | GoodDual spinning mop pads apply pressure-controlled downforce for hard-floor cleaning, per the manufacturer's design. |
| Low / medium pile | GoodMop pads lift automatically on carpet, and the manufacturer states 4 suction levels for varying floor types. |
| High pile / shag | DependsNo independent test of high-pile performance was found; only 4 suction levels and automatic pad lift are documented. |
| Mopping needs | |
| Vacuum only | GoodStrong vacuum; the mop lifts or detaches when not needed. |
| Light mopping | GoodActive mopping system covers routine floors easily. |
| Frequent mopping | GoodPressure or rotating mop with self-wash is built for frequent mopping. |
| You want to… | |
| Empty bin myself | GoodYou'll already check the bin regularly, sidestepping the independent review's finding that the dock's bin fills too fast. |
| Empty occasionally | DependsThe self-empty dock reduces bin duties, but expect occasional manual mop-pad handling since drying reportedly leaves pads damp. |
| Set-and-forget | PoorAn independent review found the bin fills too fast and mop pads stay damp over 12 hours, undermining true set-and-forget use. |
A robot being poor for a condition is a fact about fit, not a fault. “Depends” means the record names a limit worth reading, not that the answer is unknown.
What the score is built from.
Nine inputs across three pillars, each weighted as shown and each scored so more is better. A robot can lead on one and trail on another, which is the point of showing them apart.
Capability
Task completion16% of score
Does it finish the job it is sold to do, unattended
60
- ROIDMI EVA60
18median 72 across 433 scored robots100
Coverage and navigation10% of score
Does it work the whole area, and hold that between runs
75
- ROIDMI EVA75
0median 70 across 421 scored robots100
Edge-case recovery10% of score
Does it recover from the failures its category presents
25
- ROIDMI EVA25
18median 52 across 320 scored robots100
Operating envelope4% of score
How far conditions can vary before performance drops
65
- ROIDMI EVA65
28median 68 across 397 scored robots100
Dependability
Field failure rate16% of score
Documented hardware failures per owner-year
46
- ROIDMI EVA46
6median 70 across 359 scored robots100
Software stability14% of score
Whether updates fix more than they break
40
- ROIDMI EVA40
15median 65 across 342 scored robots100
Support longevity10% of score
Committed parts, service and updates, with dates
0
- ROIDMI EVA0
0median 62 across 429 scored robots100
Ownership burden
Routine maintenance12% of score
Hands-on time it asks for in normal operation
50
- ROIDMI EVA50
22median 67 across 434 scored robots100
Consumables8% of score
Parts that must be bought to keep it working
75
- ROIDMI EVA75
8median 69 across 434 scored robots100
How far apart is a long way?
A number only means something next to the spread it sits in. Each track is the real range across every classified robot in the class, with the median marked.
These robots share no measured specification with enough published figures to plot. That is a gap in the record, not a finding about the robots.
What the numbers leave out.
Written on each record, and the only thing here every robot on the site carries.
The trade-off
What each design gives up to be good at what it is good at.
ROIDMI EVA
The dock is designed to self-empty and self-wash mop pads, but an independent review found the design under-delivered on both counts in practice, before the manufacturer’s closure removed any path to a fix.
Remaining retail inventory can still be found through some third-party channels, but buying it now means buying a robot with no manufacturer support of any kind.
Who each one is wrong for
Stated by the record itself. A robot being wrong for a household is a fact about fit, not a fault.
ROIDMI EVA
- Buyers wanting any form of manufacturer support
- Roidmi has ceased operations and discontinued product maintenance, returns, and after-sales service.
- Large homes needing a single uninterrupted cleaning run
- An independent review found the dustbin fills too fast to complete a full-floor clean without manual emptying.
- Buyers relying on the dock to fully dry mop pads unattended
- The same independent review found pads remained damp more than 12 hours after the drying cycle.
What stays your job
The upkeep ownership hands back to you, whatever the autonomy level says.
ROIDMI EVA
- After every use: Pull the mop pads to air-dry after mopping runs; an independent review found the dock’s drying cycle left pads damp more than 12 hours later.
- Weekly: Refill the dock’s clean-water tank and empty the dirty-water tank.
- Monthly: Rinse the dock’s wash tray, check the dual spinning pads for wear, and wipe the LiDAR turret and infrared sensors.
- As needed: Replace the dust bag; ROIDMI rated it for roughly 60 days per bag.
- As needed: Source bags, pads, and filters from third parties; Roidmi’s December 2024 closure ended official parts supply and after-sales service.
How much each of these is standing on.
Classifications rest on different depths of evidence. A pre-release assessment and a verified one are not the same kind of claim.
| Robot | Evidence status | Sources reviewed | Last assessed |
|---|---|---|---|
| ROIDMI EVA | Discontinued | 3 | Aug 2026 |
Evidence status counts the sources behind a classification, not their kind. A high count can be maker documentation and price coverage, so read it as how much was reviewed rather than as independent testing. How we weigh evidence.
Keep going.
Robovations classifies robots; it does not rank them. Nothing on this page is a recommendation, and no manufacturer influences a classification or its placement here.
Add a robot
Comparing across classes is allowed — the page will switch to per-class positioning and tell you it has.