
Kress
Kress KR172 Mission RTKn
- Autonomy
- IIIConditional
- Score
- 79/100Strong
- Readiness
- Ready Now
- Price
- $2,499.99list

Kress

Up to three
All robot lawn mowers. Every figure below is placed against the whole class, so a gap can be read against how much the class itself varies.
The conditions each robot was assessed against, side by side. Rows marked in gold are where these machines genuinely differ.
| Condition | KR172 Mission RTKn | Worx Landroid Vision … |
|---|---|---|
| Yard size | ||
| Under ¼ acre | GoodDesigned for ½-acre minimum; undersized lots see inefficient overlapping paths and poor RTK signal stability. | GoodWirecutter ran it on a quarter-acre yard and found it very dependable. |
| ¼ – ½ acrethey differ | GoodOptimal range for RTK-based systematic mowing. One-pass coverage achievable with RTK antenna lock. | DependsWorx rates 1 acre, but Wirecutter thinks the 5 Ah battery suits quarter-acre yards better. |
| Over ½ acrethey differ | GoodRTK accuracy scales well to multi-acre properties. Extended runtime (up to 180 min) handles 2-acre cuts in one session. | DependsWorx lists 1 acre, and no test of the WR340 on a yard over half an acre was found. |
| Terrain | ||
| Mostly flat | GoodRTK and LiDAR obstacle avoidance excel on flat terrain; documented performance in residential flat yards. | GoodWirecutter found it cut its test yard consistently without hangups or technical snafus. |
| Gentle slopesthey differ | DependsRated for up to 25% gradient; owner reports show traction loss above 20% on wet grass. Steep transitions between flat and slope reduce efficiency. | GoodWirecutter saw it manage moderate inclines, and front-wheel drive helped on rough patches. |
| Steep / hilly | PoorHardware limit at 25%+ gradient; documented traction failure on steep hillsides or unstable soil. | PoorWorx rates it for 30% slopes, and Wirecutter advises care on steep hills. |
| Grass type | ||
| Typical lawn grass | GoodStandard turf cuts cleanly with documented blade cadence. Replacement intervals 6-12 months depending on density. | GoodWirecutter found the yard stayed well groomed across its cutting patterns. |
| Mixed / tall growth | DependsSingle-pass efficiency drops on thick or tall fescue; multiple passes may be needed. Blade wear accelerates. | DependsNo test of the WR340 in long or overgrown grass was found. |
| Thick (Bermuda / Zoysia) | DependsBermuda and dense turf require frequent blade inspection. Blade dulling visible after 8-10 weeks; check cut quality weekly. | DependsNo test in thick or dense turf was found for its 8.7 inch cut. |
| Boundary setup | ||
| Wireless required | GoodRTKn is wire-free by design; app-defined virtual boundaries work without perimeter installation. | GoodRTK Cloud virtual boundaries need no wire or antenna, per Worx and Wirecutter. |
| Wire required | PoorRTKn does not accept traditional perimeter wire. Satellite RTK positioning is the only boundary method available. | PoorWorx lists RTK Cloud navigation with no boundary wire installation option. |
| No preference | GoodWire-free RTK-based operation. No perimeter wire setup required or supported. | GoodIts wire-free setup meets a buyer with no boundary preference. |
A robot being poor for a condition is a fact about fit, not a fault. “Depends” means the record names a limit worth reading, not that the answer is unknown.
Nine inputs across three pillars, each weighted as shown and each scored so more is better. A robot can lead on one and trail on another, which is the point of showing them apart.
A number only means something next to the spread it sits in. Each track is the real range across every classified robot in the class, with the median marked.
Not compared, because fewer than two of these robots carry a published figure: Runtime, Noise.
Written on each record, and the only thing here every robot on the site carries.
What each design gives up to be good at what it is good at.
Network positioning replaces wire: no perimeter to lay and no antenna, beacon or base station to mount, but the property has to be inside Kress’s RTKn coverage. Inertial navigation and odometry bridge shaded stretches, not a missing footprint.
Antenna-free RTK over lifetime 4G keeps setup light in the yard, but navigation may suffer where trees block the sky.
A Cut-to-Zero edge disc trims borders, though Wirecutter still had some trimming to do.
Stated by the record itself. A robot being wrong for a household is a fact about fit, not a fault.
The upkeep ownership hands back to you, whatever the autonomy level says.
Classifications rest on different depths of evidence. A pre-release assessment and a verified one are not the same kind of claim.
| Robot | Evidence status | Sources reviewed | Last assessed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kress KR172 Mission RTKn | Pending | 3 | Aug 2026 |
| Worx Landroid Vision Cloud WR340 | Provisional | 5 | Sep 2026 |
Evidence status counts the sources behind a classification, not their kind. A high count can be maker documentation and price coverage, so read it as how much was reviewed rather than as independent testing. How we weigh evidence.
The full recordKress KR172 Mission RTKnSpecifications, evidence, the Fit Check in full, and every tracked change.
The full recordWorx Landroid Vision Cloud WR340Specifications, evidence, the Fit Check in full, and every tracked change.Robovations classifies robots; it does not rank them. Nothing on this page is a recommendation, and no manufacturer influences a classification or its placement here.
Comparing across classes is allowed — the page will switch to per-class positioning and tell you it has.