
iRobot
iRobot Roomba Plus 678 Combo
- Autonomy
- IIIConditional
- Score
- 61/100Capable
- Readiness
- New to Market
- Price
- $899list

iRobot

Up to three
All robot vacuums. Every figure below is placed against the whole class, so a gap can be read against how much the class itself varies.
The conditions each robot was assessed against, side by side. Rows marked in gold are where these machines genuinely differ.
| Condition | Roomba Plus 678 Combo | Shark PowerDetect Nev… |
|---|---|---|
| Home size | ||
| Under 1,500 sqft | GoodRecharge-and-resume and retained LiDAR mapping comfortably cover a compact single-level home in one scheduled run. | Good60-day capacity exceeds needs for small homes; entry cost ($1,299) overkill for compact spaces. |
| 1,500 – 3,000 | GoodSystematic LiDAR mapping and recharge-and-resume are built for this range; typical single-level layouts complete in one scheduled run. | GoodLiDAR handles 1,500-3,000 sqft effectively; 60-day dock capacity well-suited to large single-floor layout. |
| Over 3,000they differ | DependsIndependent multi-level or large-home coverage testing does not yet exist for this model; recharge-and-resume adds passes rather than eliminating them. | GoodCovers 3,000+ sqft; 60-day dock capacity and LiDAR mapping handle large single-floor homes. |
| Primary floors | ||
| Hard floors | GoodThe PowerSpin roller and LiDAR navigation are built around hard-floor vacuum-plus-mop runs. | GoodDesigned for hard floors; early owner reports confirm strong performance and DirtDetect adaptation. |
| Low / medium pilethey differ | GoodThe roller auto-lifts on low-pile carpet detection; suction performance on carpet is not independently benchmarked. | DependsWorks on low-pile but suction efficiency drops; brush design hard-floor optimized. |
| High pile / shagthey differ | DependsNo independent suction or high-pile test results are documented for this model, and rated suction trails the Max-tier sibling. | PoorSuction and brush design insufficient for high-pile and shag carpet; early owner reports pending. |
| Mopping needs | ||
| Vacuum only | GoodStrong vacuum; the mop lifts or detaches when not needed. | GoodStrong vacuum; the mop lifts or detaches when not needed. |
| Light mopping | GoodActive mopping system covers routine floors easily. | GoodActive mopping system covers routine floors easily. |
| Frequent mopping | GoodPressure or rotating mop with self-wash is built for frequent mopping. | GoodPressure or rotating mop with self-wash is built for frequent mopping. |
| You want to… | ||
| Empty bin myself | GoodThe dock automates roller washing and bin emptying, but a hands-on reader can still top off concentrate and run manual clean cycles. | Good60-day dock capacity designed for hands-off operation; not suited for frequent hands-on maintenance preference. |
| Empty occasionally | GoodThe AutoWash dock's self-wash and self-empty cycles handle most routine upkeep between periodic concentrate refills and bag swaps. | GoodExtended dock intervals reduce hands-on time, but filter cleaning and occasional resets still required; asymmetric maintenance profile. |
| Set-and-forgetthey differ | DependsThe dock automates washing and emptying, but the concentrate reservoir and self-empty bag still need periodic manual refills, so it is not fully hands-off. | Good60-day bagless dock and app scheduling enable extended operation with minimal manual intervention. |
A robot being poor for a condition is a fact about fit, not a fault. “Depends” means the record names a limit worth reading, not that the answer is unknown.
Nine inputs across three pillars, each weighted as shown and each scored so more is better. A robot can lead on one and trail on another, which is the point of showing them apart.
A number only means something next to the spread it sits in. Each track is the real range across every classified robot in the class, with the median marked.
Not compared, because fewer than two of these robots carry a published figure: Suction, Runtime, Charge time, Noise, Weight, Height.
Written on each record, and the only thing here every robot on the site carries.
What each design gives up to be good at what it is good at.
The AutoWash dock hot-washes and heat-dries the roller mop and auto-empties the bin, but that is more moving parts in the dock than a dry-empty-only station, and none of it has independent long-term reliability data yet.
Undercuts the Max 875 Combo by roughly $300 with the same AutoWash dock architecture, but at lower rated suction (30,000 Pa), so the price gap likely tracks a real carpet-cleaning gap, not just branding.
The base is what the premium buys: pad washing, pad drying, water refill and 60 days of debris in one housing. It is a large object to give floor space to, and the wash cycle means the base needs a clean-water refill roughly monthly rather than nothing at all.
Vacuuming and mopping in one pass means the pad lifts on carpet rather than the robot skipping carpeted rooms, so carpet gets vacuum-only attention. Hard-floor cleaning is documented as strong; pet-hair pickup on pile is not.
Stated by the record itself. A robot being wrong for a household is a fact about fit, not a fault.
The upkeep ownership hands back to you, whatever the autonomy level says.
Classifications rest on different depths of evidence. A pre-release assessment and a verified one are not the same kind of claim.
| Robot | Evidence status | Sources reviewed | Last assessed |
|---|---|---|---|
| iRobot Roomba Plus 678 Combo | Verified | 7 | Sep 2026 |
| Shark PowerDetect NeverTouch Pro | Pending | 2 | May 2026 |
Evidence status counts the sources behind a classification, not their kind. A high count can be maker documentation and price coverage, so read it as how much was reviewed rather than as independent testing. How we weigh evidence.
The full recordiRobot Roomba Plus 678 ComboSpecifications, evidence, the Fit Check in full, and every tracked change.
The full recordShark PowerDetect NeverTouch ProSpecifications, evidence, the Fit Check in full, and every tracked change.Robovations classifies robots; it does not rank them. Nothing on this page is a recommendation, and no manufacturer influences a classification or its placement here.
Comparing across classes is allowed — the page will switch to per-class positioning and tell you it has.