
iRobot
iRobot Roomba Max 775 Combo
- Autonomy
- IIIConditional
- Score
- 77/100Strong
- Readiness
- Ready Now
- Price
- $999.99list

iRobot

bObsweep
Up to three
All robot vacuums. Every figure below is placed against the whole class, so a gap can be read against how much the class itself varies.
The conditions each robot was assessed against, side by side. Rows marked in gold are where these machines genuinely differ.
| Condition | Roomba Max 775 Combo | bObsweep UltraVision |
|---|---|---|
| Home size | ||
| Under 1,500 sqft | GoodCapable but overkill for apartment-sized spaces; faster-cycling mop-only units suit compact homes better. | GoodOwners with small homes report the battery covers the whole floor two to three times per charge. |
| 1,500 – 3,000they differ | Good30,000Pa suction completes most 2-floor homes in one run; hot-water mop ideal for kitchen and bathroom flooring. | DependsbObsweep publishes no runtime figure, so coverage of a mid-size home per charge is not documented. |
| Over 3,000they differ | GoodExtended runtime and auto-empty dock handle large homes across multiple rooms; multi-floor mapping navigates complex layouts. | DependsNo runtime is published and owners report faster drain on high suction, so large homes may need multiple charges. |
| Primary floors | ||
| Hard floors | GoodHot-spray mop and motorized wash cycle excel on tile, hardwood, and vinyl; no manual water changes required. | GoodLiDAR mapping and 8,000 Pa rated suction pick up debris across hard floors, with no carpet limits to manage. |
| Low / medium pile | Good30,000Pa suction and motorized side brush deliver reliable pickup on low-pile and twist carpet; mop compatibility requires no-mop zones. | GoodOwners compare its medium and high settings favorably on carpet, at the cost of faster battery drain. |
| High pile / shag | DependsiRobot flagships document suction loss on shag and high-pile; mop performance on thick carpet may require manual intervention on heavily matted areas. | DependsbObsweep's manual says the brush is not suited to shag; no figure covers other high-pile carpet. |
| Mopping needs | ||
| Vacuum only | GoodStrong vacuum; the mop lifts or detaches when not needed. | GoodVacuums first; the mop pad is optional. |
| Light mopping | GoodActive mopping system covers routine floors easily. | GoodFlat mop pad handles light, routine wiping of hard floors. |
| Frequent moppingthey differ | GoodPressure or rotating mop with self-wash is built for frequent mopping. | DependsA dragged pad freshens floors but lacks the pressure or scrubbing for heavy, frequent mopping. |
| You want to… | ||
| Empty bin myself | GoodAuto-empty and hot-water dock reduce daily contact, but weekly water-tank refills, mop-pad swaps, and dock cleaning remain necessary. | GoodMonthly cleaning, weekly brush clearing and hand-washed mop cloths suit an owner willing to do upkeep. |
| Empty occasionally | GoodHot-water dock and motorized wash cycle handle most routine maintenance; weekly checks and monthly consumable swaps keep effort moderate. | GoodThe dock handles dust for months while the owner handles brushes and mop cloths. |
| Set-and-forgetthey differ | PoorHot-water dock and mop-pad washing require weekly intervention; no truly set-and-forget configuration available for combo units. | DependsOwners report weekly hair clearing and hand-washed mop cloths, so it is not maintenance-free. |
A robot being poor for a condition is a fact about fit, not a fault. “Depends” means the record names a limit worth reading, not that the answer is unknown.
Nine inputs across three pillars, each weighted as shown and each scored so more is better. A robot can lead on one and trail on another, which is the point of showing them apart.
A number only means something next to the spread it sits in. Each track is the real range across every classified robot in the class, with the median marked.
Not compared, because fewer than two of these robots carry a published figure: Runtime, Charge time, Noise, Height.
Written on each record, and the only thing here every robot on the site carries.
What each design gives up to be good at what it is good at.
You are paying flagship money for the dock rather than the navigation. The AutoWash Dock is not new hardware, it has been iRobot’s mop-washing base since the Combo 10 Max in 2024, but it is where most of the price and all of the floor space goes.
Hot-water capability removes manual mop-fill friction, but it shifts dock failure modes from simple (a clogged nozzle) to compound (water circulation, heating, the roller wash cycle). Recovery means dock troubleshooting, not just a part swap.
Longitudinal data is thin. The machine launched in June 2026, so owner reports on roller wear, the dock’s water circuit and long-run map stability are still sparse. The classification rests on published specification more than on accumulated field evidence.
The dock takes care of dust for up to 180 days; the mop is a cloth you wash yourself.
List price is $929 at bObsweep, yet retailer sales have sold the same model for $299, so the price paid depends almost entirely on timing.
Stated by the record itself. A robot being wrong for a household is a fact about fit, not a fault.
The upkeep ownership hands back to you, whatever the autonomy level says.
Classifications rest on different depths of evidence. A pre-release assessment and a verified one are not the same kind of claim.
| Robot | Evidence status | Sources reviewed | Last assessed |
|---|---|---|---|
| iRobot Roomba Max 775 Combo | Provisional | 7 | Sep 2026 |
| bObsweep UltraVision | Provisional | 6 | Sep 2026 |
Evidence status counts the sources behind a classification, not their kind. A high count can be maker documentation and price coverage, so read it as how much was reviewed rather than as independent testing. How we weigh evidence.
The full recordiRobot Roomba Max 775 ComboSpecifications, evidence, the Fit Check in full, and every tracked change.
The full recordbObsweep UltraVisionSpecifications, evidence, the Fit Check in full, and every tracked change.Robovations classifies robots; it does not rank them. Nothing on this page is a recommendation, and no manufacturer influences a classification or its placement here.
Comparing across classes is allowed — the page will switch to per-class positioning and tell you it has.