Skip to content
Saved
Comparison · 2 robots

Husqvarna Automower 430V NERA · Segway Navimow i105N

All robot lawn mowers. Every measure below is plotted against the full class, so a difference can be read against how much the class itself varies.

  1. Husqvarna Automower 430V NERA
  2. Segway Navimow i105N

Up to three

01 Classification

What each one does on its own.

The Autonomy Ladder is the same five rungs for every robot on the site. A rung describes the conditions a robot handles without you, not how good it is.

V
Generalized
Any task, any setting
IV
Environmental
Handles new obstacles without help
III
Conditional
Finishes familiar jobs on its own
Husqvarna Automower 430V NERASegway Navimow i105N
II
Assisted
Runs preset routines, needs rescue
I
Manual
One action, on command
02 Assessment

Where they actually differ.

The Robovations Score is nine inputs across three pillars, each weighted as shown and each scored so that more is better. A robot can lead on one and trail on another, which is the point of showing them apart. Cost of ownership and data handling are reported on each robot's own page and are never averaged into the score.

Capability

Task completion16% of score
Does it finish the job it is sold to do, unattended
  • Husqvarna Automower 430V NERA80
  • Segway Navimow i105N68
18median 72 across 429 scored robots100
Coverage and navigation10% of score
Does it work the whole area, and hold that between runs
  • Husqvarna Automower 430V NERA74
  • Segway Navimow i105N65
0median 70 across 417 scored robots100
Edge-case recovery10% of score
Does it recover from the failures its category presents
  • Husqvarna Automower 430V NERA60
  • Segway Navimow i105N52
18median 52 across 318 scored robots100
Operating envelope4% of score
How far conditions can vary before performance drops
  • Husqvarna Automower 430V NERA70
  • Segway Navimow i105N50
28median 68 across 393 scored robots100

Dependability

Field failure rate16% of score
Documented hardware failures per owner-year
  • Husqvarna Automower 430V NERA70
  • Segway Navimow i105N33
6median 70 across 355 scored robots100
Software stability14% of score
Whether updates fix more than they break
  • Husqvarna Automower 430V NERA58
  • Segway Navimow i105N65
15median 65 across 340 scored robots100
Support longevity10% of score
Committed parts, service and updates, with dates
  • Husqvarna Automower 430V NERA60
  • Segway Navimow i105N65
0median 62 across 425 scored robots100

Ownership burden

Routine maintenance12% of score
Hands-on time it asks for in normal operation
  • Husqvarna Automower 430V NERA62
  • Segway Navimow i105N70
22median 67 across 430 scored robots100
Consumables8% of score
Parts that must be bought to keep it working
  • Husqvarna Automower 430V NERA66
  • Segway Navimow i105N75
8median 69 across 430 scored robots100
03 Measured against the class

How far apart is a long way?

A number only means something next to the spread it sits in. Each track below is the real range across every classified robot in the class, with the median marked.

Runtime105 with a published figure
  • Husqvarna Automower 430V NERA95 min
  • Segway Navimow i105N60 min
30 minmedian 100 min240 min
Charge time106 with a published figure
  • Husqvarna Automower 430V NERA50 min
  • Segway Navimow i105N90 min
30 minmedian 90 min300 min
Noise104 with a published figure
  • Husqvarna Automower 430V NERA56 dB
  • Segway Navimow i105N58 dB
50 dBmedian 60 dB82 dB
Weight116 with a published figure
  • Husqvarna Automower 430V NERA33.1 lbs
  • Segway Navimow i105N24 lbs
13 lbsmedian 30 lbs134 lbs
Height117 with a published figure
  • Husqvarna Automower 430V NERA11 in
  • Segway Navimow i105N11.2 in
7.5 inmedian 11 in16.5 in

Not compared, because fewer than two of these robots carry a published figure: Price, Suction.

04 Ownership

What the numbers leave out.

The trade-off

What each design gives up to be good at what it is good at.

Husqvarna Automower 430V NERA

AI obstacle avoidance skirts trees and toys neatly, but also reads twigs and leaves as obstacles and leaves patches uncut.

A fixed transport path keeps zones connected, yet repeating it wore a visible track into the lawn in dry weather.

Segway Navimow i105N

Wire-free setup skips the trenching every boundary-wire mower requires, but it trades that convenience for RTK signal dependency that a buried wire never had to worry about.

Entry-tier coverage area: sized and priced for small, simple lots, not the acreage Segway markets its H-series line to handle.

Who each one is wrong for

Stated by the record itself. A robot being wrong for a household is a fact about fit, not a fault.

Husqvarna Automower 430V NERA
Lawns often covered in twigs and leaves
Trusted Reviews found it treated twigs, branches and large leaves as obstacles and skirted them, leaving sections uncut.
Owners who want a set-and-forget map
Exclusion zones and boundaries needed tweaking after a wheel dropped into a flower bed and the mower slipped past a boundary on a slope.
Very hilly or rough ground
On the hilliest section, Trusted Reviews saw it turn in the same places and dig up grass, and suggests an AWD model for rough terrain.
Small, regular lawns
Trusted Reviews points owners of smaller, standard lawns to cheaper and simpler robots.
Segway Navimow i105N
Lawns over roughly half an acre
Coverage sits well below Segway's larger i-series and H-series models; oversized lots outrun a single charge cycle and the mapped area limit this entry model is built for.
Yards with grades beyond roughly 30%
The front-wheel-drive chassis with off-road traction control is documented for slopes up to 30%; Segway positions its AWD models for terrain beyond that.
Yards shaded by dense tree cover or tall buildings
RTK positioning depends on a clear sky view; heavy canopy or nearby structures are a documented condition that degrades satellite-based navigation accuracy.
Owners who specifically want a buried perimeter wire
There is no wired-boundary option on this line; the entire design point is wire-free RTK-and-camera navigation instead of a buried loop.
Overgrown or thick, fast-growing turf
Small pivoting blades and a frequent-mow design are built for regular upkeep, not for clearing tall or dense grass that has gone unmowed for weeks.

What stays your job

The upkeep ownership hands back to you, whatever the autonomy level says.

Husqvarna Automower 430V NERA
  • Weekly: Clear twigs, branches and large leaves from the lawn so the camera does not treat them as obstacles.
  • As needed: Reroute the transport path between zones to stop a worn track forming.
  • As needed: Adjust exclusion zones and boundaries in the app after wheel drops or boundary slips.
  • As needed: Replace the three razor blades when blunt; Trusted Reviews needed new ones after 400 hours.
  • Seasonally: Start with a high cut height and lower it gradually, adjusting schedules per zone.
Segway Navimow i105N
  • Monthly: Wipe down the AI camera lens on the mower body to keep obstacle detection accurate.
  • Monthly: Check the underside for grass buildup and clear it away from the blade disc and wheels.
  • Every 3-6 months: Replace the pivoting cutting blades; more often on thick or fast-growing turf.
  • Seasonally: Clean the charging contacts on the dock and mower before spring startup.
  • Seasonally: Store the mower and RTK reference station indoors over winter per Segway’s cold-weather guidance.
  • As needed: Reposition or re-survey the RTK reference station if satellite accuracy drifts.
  • Annually: Check wheel motors and drive belts for wear before the new mowing season.
05 Evidence

How much each of these is standing on.

Classifications rest on different depths of evidence. A pre-release assessment and a verified one are not the same kind of claim.

Evidence behind each classification
Robot Evidence status Sources reviewed Last assessed
Husqvarna Automower 430V NERA Provisional 6 Sep 2026
Segway Navimow i105N Provisional Sep 2026

Robovations classifies robots; it does not rank them. Nothing on this page is a recommendation, and no manufacturer influences a classification or its placement here.