Hexagon Robotics
Hexagon AEON
- Autonomy
- IIAssisted
- Pre-release
- 44/100Concept Stage
- Readiness
- Not assessed
- Price
- Not tracked
ComparisonHexagon AEON and Pudu D7
Pudu Robotics
Pudu D7
- Autonomy
- IIAssisted
- Pre-release
- 89/100Pre-Order Ready
- Readiness
- Not assessed
- Price
- Not tracked
Up to three
Autonomy Ladder
- IManual
- IIAssisted
- IIIConditional
- IVEnvironmental
- VGeneralized
All humanoid robots. Every figure below is placed against the whole class, so a gap can be read against how much the class itself varies.
Where each one suits you.
The conditions each robot was assessed against, side by side. Rows marked in gold are where these machines genuinely differ.
| Condition | Hexagon AEON | Pudu D7 |
|---|---|---|
| Where it operates | ||
| Home / residential | PoorAEON has never been deployed in a home setting; all documented pilots run inside BMW and Schaeffler factory floors. | PoorConsumer household use is not supported; no retail consumer channel exists. |
| Office / retail | DependsNo pilot has been documented outside heavy manufacturing; general office or retail commercial use is undemonstrated. | DependsSuited for pilot deployments with trained facility staff and structured operating spaces. |
| Warehouse / factory | GoodPurpose-built for factory environments; live pilots run inside BMW's Leipzig plant and Schaeffler's training facility. | GoodIndustrial warehouses, factories, and logistics environments align with current deployment focus. |
| Primary tasks | ||
| Household choresthey differ | PoorNo household or general chore capability has been demonstrated; documented tasks are structured factory operations. | DependsLimited dexterity for household chores; scripted or teleop-assisted sequences only. |
| Social / care | PoorAEON is not designed or marketed for social or companionship interaction of any kind. | PoorNo social interaction capability; platform designed for manipulation and logistics, not engagement. |
| Specialized job | GoodDocumented tasks are narrow and specialized: machine tending, part inspection, and EV battery-assembly handoffs. | GoodSpecialized manipulation in industrial settings matches intended use case and commercial pilot deployments. |
| Supervision needs | ||
| Fully autonomous | PoorNo unsupervised deployment has been documented; every pilot runs with dedicated on-site safety staff present. | PoorSupervised operation required; industrial safety protocols and human oversight are mandatory. |
| With oversight | GoodCurrent BMW and Schaeffler pilots run with structured handoffs and on-site safety personnel present throughout. | GoodThe D7 thrives under active supervision where operators can intervene in task execution and override autonomous sequences. |
| Teleoperatedthey differ | DependsAEON is built for onboard AI-driven autonomy rather than as a remote-piloted platform; teleoperated control is not documented as a supported mode. | GoodPilot customer deployments with trained facility staff align with current commercial offering. |
| Timeline | ||
| Ready today | PoorAEON is not commercially available today in any form; every deployment is an active, closely supervised industrial pilot. | PoorNot consumer-ready; only available to commercial and industrial pilots. |
| Near-term (1–2 yrs)they differ | GoodMatches AEON's current stage: live pilots underway with a stated near-term scale-up toward roughly 1,000 units at Schaeffler. | DependsD7 represents near-term potential for Pudu if consumer timeline is announced and retail distribution established. |
| Research phasethey differ | DependsAEON has moved past pure research demos into live factory task execution, so a research-only framing understates its current stage. | GoodActive research and pilot deployment phase; suitable for industrial AI and logistics technology exploration. |
A robot being poor for a condition is a fact about fit, not a fault. “Depends” means the record names a limit worth reading, not that the answer is unknown.
How much the claim can be trusted.
None of these has shipped, so they are assessed on track record, engineering plausibility and how the demonstrations match the claims.
Track Record35% of score
Has this maker shipped what it demoed before, on schedule, with the promised capability?
3893
- Hexagon AEON38
- Pudu D793
28median 69 across 80 pre-release records100
Engineering35% of score
Are the demonstrated capabilities achievable in shipping form, or do they need breakthroughs not in evidence?
4091
- Hexagon AEON40
- Pudu D791
35median 70 across 87 pre-release records100
Demo Match30% of score
What has been shown to work, against what is claimed in marketing.
5683
- Hexagon AEON56
- Pudu D783
30median 66 across 87 pre-release records100
Published beside the number
Never averaged into it. These describe how much the maker has disclosed, not what the machine does.
| Hexagon AEON | Pudu D7 | |
|---|---|---|
| ReadinessShip-date specificity, pricing transparency, distribution and regulatory status. Published beside the number; never averaged in. | 38/100 | 60/100 |
| DisclosureHow much of the product is disclosed. Higher means fewer fundamental unknowns remain. Published beside the number; never averaged in. | 32/100 | 100/100 |
How far apart is a long way?
A number only means something next to the spread it sits in. Each track is the real range across every classified robot in the class, with the median marked.
Weight48 with a published figure
132.3 lbs99.2 lbs
- Hexagon AEON132.3 lbs
- Pudu D799.2 lbs
26.5 lbsmedian 142.6 lbs661.4 lbs
Height51 with a published figure
65 in65 in
- Hexagon AEON65 in
- Pudu D765 in
34.7 inmedian 66.9 in86.6 in
Not compared, because fewer than two of these robots carry a published figure: Price, Runtime, Charge time, Noise.
What the numbers leave out.
Written on each record, and the only thing here every robot on the site carries.
The trade-off
What each design gives up to be good at what it is good at.
Hexagon AEON
Hexagon has never shipped a humanoid before this one, so the 1,000-unit Schaeffler commitment is a bet on a first-generation platform, not a proven one.
The pilot replaces no job outright yet: on-site safety staff remain present at every documented deployment, which is supervision, not autonomy.
Pudu D7
The dual 7-DOF arms deliver real manipulation, but neither hand achieves the dexterity or speed of a human operator, handoff tasks still demand human intervention or pre-taught scripted sequences.
Who each one is wrong for
Stated by the record itself. A robot being wrong for a household is a fact about fit, not a fault.
Hexagon AEON
- Households or consumer buyers of any kind
- AEON is not sold, priced, or available to individual consumers; every documented deployment is an industrial pilot partnership.
- Buyers needing unsupervised, hands-off operation today
- Every documented deployment runs with on-site safety staff present; no hands-off or unsupervised use has been shown.
- Smaller operations wanting a single unit or short trial
- The disclosed commitment is roughly 1,000 units with Schaeffler; there is no published path to a small-scale or single-unit order.
- Buyers requiring a proven safety or reliability record
- No independent safety certification, failure-rate data, or multi-year track record exists yet for this first-generation platform.
Pudu D7
- Unstructured consumer home environments
- The D7 is not designed, priced, or distributed for household use. Consumer robotics assume minimal supervision; the D7 requires facility staff oversight and structured operating spaces.
- Fully autonomous multi-floor navigation
- Wheeled base excels on single-level flat surfaces. Multi-floor environments or steep stairs require physical relocation between levels, limiting independent deployment in complex buildings.
- Situations requiring bipedal stability on narrow passages
- Wheeled base provides wider stance and footprint than bipedal alternatives. Narrow doorways, tight warehouse aisles, or confined spaces may constrain maneuverability despite the compact torso.
What stays your job
The upkeep ownership hands back to you, whatever the autonomy level says.
Hexagon AEON
- Daily: Battery charging between shifts; no published downtime or hot-swap figures.
- Weekly: Sensor and camera calibration checks by on-site technical staff.
- Monthly: Software and behavior updates pushed via Hexagon’s fleet management.
- Every 3-6 months: Actuator and joint wear inspection; no published parts-replacement cadence.
- As needed: Wheeled-leg component service; no independent failure or repair data published.
Pudu D7
- Weekly: Gripper and end-effector inspection for wear or damage.
- Monthly: Arm and base mechanical component lubrication per manufacturer schedule.
- Every 3-6 months: Joint calibration and sensor alignment verification.
- As needed: Gripper pad or tool changeover based on task requirements.
How much each of these is standing on.
Classifications rest on different depths of evidence. A pre-release assessment and a verified one are not the same kind of claim.
| Robot | Evidence status | Sources reviewed | Last assessed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hexagon AEON | Not Consumer-Ready | 1 | Sep 2026 |
| Pudu D7 | Not Consumer-Ready | 1 | Sep 2026 |
Evidence status counts the sources behind a classification, not their kind. A high count can be maker documentation and price coverage, so read it as how much was reviewed rather than as independent testing. How we weigh evidence.
Keep going.
The full recordHexagon AEONSpecifications, evidence, the Fit Check in full, and every tracked change.
The full recordPudu D7Specifications, evidence, the Fit Check in full, and every tracked change.Robovations classifies robots; it does not rank them. Nothing on this page is a recommendation, and no manufacturer influences a classification or its placement here.
Add a robot
Comparing across classes is allowed — the page will switch to per-class positioning and tell you it has.