Skip to content
Saved

ComparisonHayward TigerShark QC and Maytronics Dolphin S200

Up to three

All robot pool cleaners. Every figure below is placed against the whole class, so a gap can be read against how much the class itself varies.

Where each one suits you.

The conditions each robot was assessed against, side by side. Rows marked in gold are where these machines genuinely differ.

Fit verdicts by condition for each robot
Condition Hayward TigerShark QC Dolphin S200
Pool type
In-ground GoodStandard in-ground operation; random pathing works well in pools under 15k gallons with consistent pump schedules. GoodDesigned for in-ground pools with pump and return-line infrastructure.
Above-groundthey differ GoodSuction cleaners pair directly with above-ground pump filtration; no separate equipment required. PoorRequires pressure-side return line; above-ground pools typically lack this system.
Mixed setup GoodWorks with either pool type, provided pool size stays under 15k gallons and floor is stable. GoodConfirm your pool has a dedicated pressure return line before purchase.
Pool size
Small (< 400 sqft) GoodRandom pathing naturally recycles the floor; small pools see consistent weekly coverage with light debris loads. GoodCapable but may be overkill for under 8,000 gallons; a smaller suction cleaner would cost less.
Medium (400 – 800)they differ DependsPool size around 12k–15k gallons benefits from 8+ hour daily pump schedules; shorter cycles risk coverage gaps. Good12,000–20,000 gallon range is the designed operating envelope.
Large (> 800)they differ PoorPools over 15k–20k gallons show unvisited dead zones; random pathing cannot ensure complete coverage. DependsWorks in 20,000+ gallon pools but may require longer runtime or two weekly cycles.
Debris load
Fine (sand / silt)they differ Poor100-micron mesh basket clogs rapidly with fine silt or algae; fine debris forces daily basket empties instead of weekly. GoodFine sediment handled well by pressure-side filtration.
Leaves / large debris DependsModerate leaf load manageable with weekly emptying; heavy seasonal leaf fall requires two to three empties per week. DependsHeavy leaf load risks intake clogging; pre-skimming recommended during fall.
Algae / heavy foulingthey differ PoorActive algae blooms clog the fine-mesh basket within hours; unsuitable for pools experiencing algal blooms without chemical treatment. DependsFloor and wall algae handled; waterline algae requires manual brushing.
Coverage you want
Floor only GoodPurpose-built for floor cleaning with fine-mesh debris capture; operates unattended on level floors. GoodDesigned for complete floor coverage.
Floor + wallsthey differ DependsFloor cleaning is effective; walls and steps require separate manual tools or a dedicated wall-climbing cleaner. GoodStandard wall climbing with wall-return port engagement documented in specs.
Floor + walls + waterline PoorNo built-in capacity for wall or waterline cleaning; random pathing keeps the cleaner on the pool floor. PoorNo waterline jet; algae at tile line is not reached by this model.

A robot being poor for a condition is a fact about fit, not a fault. “Depends” means the record names a limit worth reading, not that the answer is unknown.

Keep going.

Robovations classifies robots; it does not rank them. Nothing on this page is a recommendation, and no manufacturer influences a classification or its placement here.