
Hayward
Hayward TigerShark QC
- Autonomy
- IIAssisted
- Score
- 68/100Capable
- Readiness
- Ready Now
- Price
- $1,489list

Hayward

Maytronics
Up to three
All robot pool cleaners. Every figure below is placed against the whole class, so a gap can be read against how much the class itself varies.
The conditions each robot was assessed against, side by side. Rows marked in gold are where these machines genuinely differ.
| Condition | Hayward TigerShark QC | Dolphin S200 |
|---|---|---|
| Pool type | ||
| In-ground | GoodStandard in-ground operation; random pathing works well in pools under 15k gallons with consistent pump schedules. | GoodDesigned for in-ground pools with pump and return-line infrastructure. |
| Above-groundthey differ | GoodSuction cleaners pair directly with above-ground pump filtration; no separate equipment required. | PoorRequires pressure-side return line; above-ground pools typically lack this system. |
| Mixed setup | GoodWorks with either pool type, provided pool size stays under 15k gallons and floor is stable. | GoodConfirm your pool has a dedicated pressure return line before purchase. |
| Pool size | ||
| Small (< 400 sqft) | GoodRandom pathing naturally recycles the floor; small pools see consistent weekly coverage with light debris loads. | GoodCapable but may be overkill for under 8,000 gallons; a smaller suction cleaner would cost less. |
| Medium (400 – 800)they differ | DependsPool size around 12k–15k gallons benefits from 8+ hour daily pump schedules; shorter cycles risk coverage gaps. | Good12,000–20,000 gallon range is the designed operating envelope. |
| Large (> 800)they differ | PoorPools over 15k–20k gallons show unvisited dead zones; random pathing cannot ensure complete coverage. | DependsWorks in 20,000+ gallon pools but may require longer runtime or two weekly cycles. |
| Debris load | ||
| Fine (sand / silt)they differ | Poor100-micron mesh basket clogs rapidly with fine silt or algae; fine debris forces daily basket empties instead of weekly. | GoodFine sediment handled well by pressure-side filtration. |
| Leaves / large debris | DependsModerate leaf load manageable with weekly emptying; heavy seasonal leaf fall requires two to three empties per week. | DependsHeavy leaf load risks intake clogging; pre-skimming recommended during fall. |
| Algae / heavy foulingthey differ | PoorActive algae blooms clog the fine-mesh basket within hours; unsuitable for pools experiencing algal blooms without chemical treatment. | DependsFloor and wall algae handled; waterline algae requires manual brushing. |
| Coverage you want | ||
| Floor only | GoodPurpose-built for floor cleaning with fine-mesh debris capture; operates unattended on level floors. | GoodDesigned for complete floor coverage. |
| Floor + wallsthey differ | DependsFloor cleaning is effective; walls and steps require separate manual tools or a dedicated wall-climbing cleaner. | GoodStandard wall climbing with wall-return port engagement documented in specs. |
| Floor + walls + waterline | PoorNo built-in capacity for wall or waterline cleaning; random pathing keeps the cleaner on the pool floor. | PoorNo waterline jet; algae at tile line is not reached by this model. |
A robot being poor for a condition is a fact about fit, not a fault. “Depends” means the record names a limit worth reading, not that the answer is unknown.
Nine inputs across three pillars, each weighted as shown and each scored so more is better. A robot can lead on one and trail on another, which is the point of showing them apart.
A number only means something next to the spread it sits in. Each track is the real range across every classified robot in the class, with the median marked.
Not compared, because fewer than two of these robots carry a published figure: Runtime, Charge time, Noise.
Written on each record, and the only thing here every robot on the site carries.
What each design gives up to be good at what it is good at.
You get full-basin cleaning with no programming overhead, but every session starts and ends by hand: the unit is carried to the water, started, lifted out, and the cartridge rinsed.
Two fixed cycles and nothing between them: four hours for a full clean, or 90 minutes on Quick Clean. No scheduling, no pause and no app, so the choice is made at the deck each time.
Coverage runs floor, walls and waterline in one cycle, but everything it collects comes out by hand: the basket is lifted from the water and emptied at the pool edge after every run.
Mains power removes any runtime ceiling, but it ties the cleaner to an outlet at the deck, and the cable comes out of the water and gets coiled after every cycle.
Stated by the record itself. A robot being wrong for a household is a fact about fit, not a fault.
The upkeep ownership hands back to you, whatever the autonomy level says.
Classifications rest on different depths of evidence. A pre-release assessment and a verified one are not the same kind of claim.
| Robot | Evidence status | Sources reviewed | Last assessed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hayward TigerShark QC | Provisional | 10 | Aug 2026 |
| Maytronics Dolphin S200 | Pending | 2 | Aug 2026 |
Evidence status counts the sources behind a classification, not their kind. A high count can be maker documentation and price coverage, so read it as how much was reviewed rather than as independent testing. How we weigh evidence.
The full recordHayward TigerShark QCSpecifications, evidence, the Fit Check in full, and every tracked change.
The full recordMaytronics Dolphin S200Specifications, evidence, the Fit Check in full, and every tracked change.Robovations classifies robots; it does not rank them. Nothing on this page is a recommendation, and no manufacturer influences a classification or its placement here.
Comparing across classes is allowed — the page will switch to per-class positioning and tell you it has.