Skip to content
Saved

ComparisonHayward TigerShark QC and Maytronics Dolphin Nautilus CC Pro

Up to three

All robot pool cleaners. Every figure below is placed against the whole class, so a gap can be read against how much the class itself varies.

Where each one suits you.

The conditions each robot was assessed against, side by side. Rows marked in gold are where these machines genuinely differ.

Fit verdicts by condition for each robot
Condition Hayward TigerShark QC Maytronics Dolphin Na…
Pool type
In-ground GoodStandard in-ground operation; random pathing works well in pools under 15k gallons with consistent pump schedules. GoodMaytronics classifies it for in-ground pools in rectangular, round, free-form and kidney shapes.
Above-ground GoodSuction cleaners pair directly with above-ground pump filtration; no separate equipment required. GoodMaytronics classifies the CC Pro for above-ground pools as well as in-ground pools.
Mixed setup GoodWorks with either pool type, provided pool size stays under 15k gallons and floor is stable. GoodMaytronics lists both in-ground and above-ground pools, so a mixed setup is covered.
Pool size
Small (< 400 sqft) GoodRandom pathing naturally recycles the floor; small pools see consistent weekly coverage with light debris loads. GoodRated for pools up to 50 ft long, well beyond a small pool's length.
Medium (400 – 800)they differ DependsPool size around 12k–15k gallons benefits from 8+ hour daily pump schedules; shorter cycles risk coverage gaps. GoodMaytronics' 50 ft length rating comfortably covers typical mid-size residential pools.
Large (> 800)they differ PoorPools over 15k–20k gallons show unvisited dead zones; random pathing cannot ensure complete coverage. DependsRated to 50 ft long; pools beyond that exceed Maytronics' stated range, and no large-pool test was found.
Debris load
Fine (sand / silt)they differ Poor100-micron mesh basket clogs rapidly with fine silt or algae; fine debris forces daily basket empties instead of weekly. DependsA fine filter kit is included, but no independent test of the CC Pro's fine debris pickup was found.
Leaves / large debris DependsModerate leaf load manageable with weekly emptying; heavy seasonal leaf fall requires two to three empties per week. DependsNo independent test of heavy leaf loads was found, and there is no full-filter warning.
Algae / heavy foulingthey differ PoorActive algae blooms clog the fine-mesh basket within hours; unsuitable for pools experiencing algal blooms without chemical treatment. DependsTwo active brushes scrub surfaces, but no independent algae test of the CC Pro was found.
Coverage you want
Floor only GoodPurpose-built for floor cleaning with fine-mesh debris capture; operates unattended on level floors. GoodMaytronics lists floor cleaning as part of its default 2-hour cleaning cycle.
Floor + wallsthey differ DependsFloor cleaning is effective; walls and steps require separate manual tools or a dedicated wall-climbing cleaner. GoodMaytronics lists floor and wall cleaning, and a reviewer describes it clinging to walls.
Floor + walls + waterlinethey differ PoorNo built-in capacity for wall or waterline cleaning; random pathing keeps the cleaner on the pool floor. DependsMaytronics claims waterline scrubbing, but no independent waterline test of the CC Pro was found.

A robot being poor for a condition is a fact about fit, not a fault. “Depends” means the record names a limit worth reading, not that the answer is unknown.

Keep going.

Robovations classifies robots; it does not rank them. Nothing on this page is a recommendation, and no manufacturer influences a classification or its placement here.