Skip to content
Saved

ComparisonFlymo EasiLife Go 200 and Stihl iMow 6 EVO

Up to three

All robot lawn mowers. Every figure below is placed against the whole class, so a gap can be read against how much the class itself varies.

Where each one suits you.

The conditions each robot was assessed against, side by side. Rows marked in gold are where these machines genuinely differ.

Fit verdicts by condition for each robot
Condition Flymo EasiLife Go 200 Stihl iMow 6 EVO
Yard size
Under ¼ acre GoodRated to 2,153 sq ft, well matched to under-quarter-acre gardens where the EasiLife line is designed to run. GoodRated to about 0.74 acres, well more coverage than a quarter-acre lawn requires; a smaller iMOW model would do the same job.
¼ – ½ acrethey differ Poor2,153 sq ft max coverage falls well short of a quarter-to-half-acre lawn; this model is not rated for that size. GoodAbout 0.74 rated acres comfortably covers this range, with the 28 cm cutting width doing the work in fewer passes.
Over ½ acrethey differ Poor2,153 sq ft maximum coverage is a small fraction of a half-acre-plus lawn; this model is built for small gardens only. GoodA rated ceiling of about 0.74 acres reaches into this bracket, and long daily run hours extend coverage further still.
Terrain
Mostly flat GoodThe 2,153 sq ft random-pattern coverage works best on flat, unobstructed ground where run-time alone decides the result. Good45 percent standard slope tolerance leaves comfortable headroom for flat terrain and level ground.
Gentle slopesthey differ DependsNo slope rating is published for this model; coverage is random rather than systematic, which matters more on uneven ground. GoodRated to 45 percent slope as sold, with the gradient kit raising that to 55 percent for steeper hillside sections.
Steep / hillythey differ PoorNo slope rating is published at all, and the mowing pattern is random rather than systematic, a poor match for hilly ground. DependsGerman testers report it can be stranded on the smallest edges of steep ground even with the gradient kit fitted.
Grass type
Typical lawn grass GoodThree pivoting razor blades with dual cutting direction handle typical lawn grass within the 20-45 mm height range. GoodThree free-swinging blades in a mulching cut handle typical turf grass with a clean, documented cut pattern.
Mixed / tall growth DependsCutting height tops out at 45 mm with no mulching or clearing capability documented for mixed or overgrown growth. DependsThe mulching cut and free-swinging blades are built for regular turf; no coverage evidence addresses mixed or overgrown grass.
Thick (Bermuda / Zoysia) DependsA 16 cm cutting width and 45 mm height ceiling are not documented as handling dense Bermuda or Zoysia growth. DependsNo documented cutting-power or blade-speed data addresses dense Bermuda or Zoysia; the mulching design is built for standard turf.
Boundary setup
Wireless required PoorThe boundary is a buried wire system only; Flymo supplies 150 m of wire and 150 stakes, with no wire-free option. PoorThe EVO range is a buried boundary wire design; there is no wire-free or satellite option on this model.
Wire required Good150 m of loop wire and 150 stakes ship in the box, matched to the buried-wire boundary this model requires. GoodA buried perimeter wire is the entire boundary system here, backed by ultrasonic obstacle sensors inside that fixed line.
No preference GoodNo preference means the buried-wire design here works fine; 150 m of wire and stakes ship in the box. GoodBoundary is wire-only regardless of preference, with ultrasonic sensors and obstacle detection working inside the buried perimeter.

A robot being poor for a condition is a fact about fit, not a fault. “Depends” means the record names a limit worth reading, not that the answer is unknown.

Keep going.

Robovations classifies robots; it does not rank them. Nothing on this page is a recommendation, and no manufacturer influences a classification or its placement here.