
Ecovacs
Ecovacs GOAT A1600 RTK
- Autonomy
- IIIConditional
- Score
- Not scored
- Readiness
- Not assessed
- Price
- Not tracked

Ecovacs

Segway
Up to three
All robot lawn mowers. Every figure below is placed against the whole class, so a gap can be read against how much the class itself varies.
The conditions each robot was assessed against, side by side. Rows marked in gold are where these machines genuinely differ.
| Condition | Ecovacs GOAT A1600 RTK | Segway Navimow i105N |
|---|---|---|
| Yard size | ||
| Under ¼ acre | GoodRated up to 1,600 square meters, roughly 0.4 acre, so a sub-quarter-acre lot sits well inside its range. | GoodSized for lawns under roughly a quarter acre, matching the i105N's entry-tier coverage rating in Segway's own specs. |
| ¼ – ½ acre | DependsRated up to about 0.4 acre, with 1,280 square meters (0.32 acre) suggested; lots toward half an acre exceed it. | DependsCoverage tops out well under half an acre; expect multiple charge cycles or incomplete single-session coverage near that size. |
| Over ½ acre | PoorStated maximum is 1,600 square meters, about 0.4 acre; lawns above half an acre are outside the rating. | PoorRated coverage falls well short of half an acre; Segway markets the i108N, i110N or H-series for bigger lots. |
| Terrain | ||
| Mostly flat | GoodFlat lawns sit well inside the stated 50 percent slope rating and the six-step cutting height range. | GoodRTK-plus-camera navigation and front-wheel traction control are documented for level turf. |
| Gentle slopes | GoodThe maker's 50 percent slope rating covers moderate grades; no independent slope test was reviewed. | GoodSegway rates the front-wheel-drive chassis and off-road traction control for slopes up to 30%, covering most moderate residential grades. |
| Steep / hilly | DependsMaker states slopes up to 50 percent; no independent steep-lawn test was reviewed, so traction on wet steep grass is unverified. | DependsDocumented slope tolerance tops out at 30%; yards with grades beyond that are outside the published rating, and Segway positions AWD H-series models for the steepest terrain. |
| Grass type | ||
| Typical lawn grass | GoodCutting height adjusts from 30 to 90 mm in six steps, which covers standard turf heights. | GoodDesigned for regular residential turf mowed on a frequent robotic schedule. |
| Mixed / tall growth | DependsCutting height tops out at 90 mm, about 3.5 inches, so taller growth is beyond its stated range. | DependsAdjustable cutting height has a documented ceiling; overgrown grass from a missed schedule needs a manual pre-cut first. |
| Thick (Bermuda / Zoysia)they differ | DependsNo independent test on dense or thick turf was found; the 33 cm dual-blade deck is the only stated cutting hardware. | PoorSmall pivoting blades and a light, mow-often design are not built to clear thick, overgrown turf in one pass. |
| Boundary setup | ||
| Wireless required | GoodWire-free: positioning comes from LiDAR-assisted RTK and vision, so no perimeter wire is installed. | GoodThe mower's entire design point is EFLS: RTK positioning fused with AI camera vision, with no buried perimeter wire at all. |
| Wire required | PoorNo boundary cable is used; the lawn is bounded by satellite and vision positioning, so a wire-based setup does not apply. | PoorThere is no wired-boundary option on this line; owners who specifically want a buried-wire system need a different mower. |
| No preference | GoodWorks without any perimeter wire, which suits an owner with no boundary preference. | GoodAny boundary preference is satisfied since the i105N never requires a wire in the first place. |
A robot being poor for a condition is a fact about fit, not a fault. “Depends” means the record names a limit worth reading, not that the answer is unknown.
A number only means something next to the spread it sits in. Each track is the real range across every classified robot in the class, with the median marked.
Not compared, because fewer than two of these robots carry a published figure: Price, Runtime, Noise.
Written on each record, and the only thing here every robot on the site carries.
What each design gives up to be good at what it is good at.
Going wire-free removes the boundary cable chore, and the stated 1,600 square meter ceiling, about 0.4 acre, becomes the limit on lawn size.
Obstacle recognition is documented as a feature; how it treats hoses, toys and animals is not established by the sources reviewed.
Wire-free setup skips the trenching every boundary-wire mower requires, but it trades that convenience for RTK signal dependency that a buried wire never had to worry about.
Entry-tier coverage area: sized and priced for small, simple lots, not the acreage Segway markets its H-series line to handle.
Stated by the record itself. A robot being wrong for a household is a fact about fit, not a fault.
The upkeep ownership hands back to you, whatever the autonomy level says.
Classifications rest on different depths of evidence. A pre-release assessment and a verified one are not the same kind of claim.
| Robot | Evidence status | Sources reviewed | Last assessed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ecovacs GOAT A1600 RTK | Provisional | — | Oct 2026 |
| Segway Navimow i105N | Pending | 2 | Sep 2026 |
Evidence status counts the sources behind a classification, not their kind. A high count can be maker documentation and price coverage, so read it as how much was reviewed rather than as independent testing. How we weigh evidence.
The full recordEcovacs GOAT A1600 RTKSpecifications, evidence, the Fit Check in full, and every tracked change.
The full recordSegway Navimow i105NSpecifications, evidence, the Fit Check in full, and every tracked change.Robovations classifies robots; it does not rank them. Nothing on this page is a recommendation, and no manufacturer influences a classification or its placement here.
Comparing across classes is allowed — the page will switch to per-class positioning and tell you it has.