Skip to content
Saved

ComparisonEcovacs GOAT A1600 RTK and Segway Navimow i105N

Up to three

All robot lawn mowers. Every figure below is placed against the whole class, so a gap can be read against how much the class itself varies.

Where each one suits you.

The conditions each robot was assessed against, side by side. Rows marked in gold are where these machines genuinely differ.

Fit verdicts by condition for each robot
Condition Ecovacs GOAT A1600 RTK Segway Navimow i105N
Yard size
Under ¼ acre GoodRated up to 1,600 square meters, roughly 0.4 acre, so a sub-quarter-acre lot sits well inside its range. GoodSized for lawns under roughly a quarter acre, matching the i105N's entry-tier coverage rating in Segway's own specs.
¼ – ½ acre DependsRated up to about 0.4 acre, with 1,280 square meters (0.32 acre) suggested; lots toward half an acre exceed it. DependsCoverage tops out well under half an acre; expect multiple charge cycles or incomplete single-session coverage near that size.
Over ½ acre PoorStated maximum is 1,600 square meters, about 0.4 acre; lawns above half an acre are outside the rating. PoorRated coverage falls well short of half an acre; Segway markets the i108N, i110N or H-series for bigger lots.
Terrain
Mostly flat GoodFlat lawns sit well inside the stated 50 percent slope rating and the six-step cutting height range. GoodRTK-plus-camera navigation and front-wheel traction control are documented for level turf.
Gentle slopes GoodThe maker's 50 percent slope rating covers moderate grades; no independent slope test was reviewed. GoodSegway rates the front-wheel-drive chassis and off-road traction control for slopes up to 30%, covering most moderate residential grades.
Steep / hilly DependsMaker states slopes up to 50 percent; no independent steep-lawn test was reviewed, so traction on wet steep grass is unverified. DependsDocumented slope tolerance tops out at 30%; yards with grades beyond that are outside the published rating, and Segway positions AWD H-series models for the steepest terrain.
Grass type
Typical lawn grass GoodCutting height adjusts from 30 to 90 mm in six steps, which covers standard turf heights. GoodDesigned for regular residential turf mowed on a frequent robotic schedule.
Mixed / tall growth DependsCutting height tops out at 90 mm, about 3.5 inches, so taller growth is beyond its stated range. DependsAdjustable cutting height has a documented ceiling; overgrown grass from a missed schedule needs a manual pre-cut first.
Thick (Bermuda / Zoysia)they differ DependsNo independent test on dense or thick turf was found; the 33 cm dual-blade deck is the only stated cutting hardware. PoorSmall pivoting blades and a light, mow-often design are not built to clear thick, overgrown turf in one pass.
Boundary setup
Wireless required GoodWire-free: positioning comes from LiDAR-assisted RTK and vision, so no perimeter wire is installed. GoodThe mower's entire design point is EFLS: RTK positioning fused with AI camera vision, with no buried perimeter wire at all.
Wire required PoorNo boundary cable is used; the lawn is bounded by satellite and vision positioning, so a wire-based setup does not apply. PoorThere is no wired-boundary option on this line; owners who specifically want a buried-wire system need a different mower.
No preference GoodWorks without any perimeter wire, which suits an owner with no boundary preference. GoodAny boundary preference is satisfied since the i105N never requires a wire in the first place.

A robot being poor for a condition is a fact about fit, not a fault. “Depends” means the record names a limit worth reading, not that the answer is unknown.

Keep going.

Robovations classifies robots; it does not rank them. Nothing on this page is a recommendation, and no manufacturer influences a classification or its placement here.