
Ecovacs
Ecovacs Deebot T90S Pro Omni
- Autonomy
- IIIConditional
- Pre-release
- 78/100Pre-Order Ready
- Readiness
- Not assessed
- Price
- Not tracked

Ecovacs

Dyson
Up to three
All robot vacuums. Every figure below is placed against the whole class, so a gap can be read against how much the class itself varies.
The conditions each robot was assessed against, side by side. Rows marked in gold are where these machines genuinely differ.
| Condition | Deebot T90S Pro Omni | Dyson R1 Nurovi Dry |
|---|---|---|
| Home size | ||
| Under 1,500 sqftthey differ | DependsRuntime and coverage per charge are unpublished before launch. | GoodA 120-minute run and saved LiDAR maps cover a compact home comfortably in one pass. |
| 1,500 – 3,000 | DependsNo battery or runtime figure exists yet to confirm single-run coverage at this size. | DependsThe 120-minute run suits mid-size homes, but Dyson does not state the R1 recharges and resumes, so a single large run can stop short. |
| Over 3,000 | DependsNo runtime, coverage area or large-home test has been published. | DependsNo published coverage figure for homes this size, and no documented recharge-and-resume, so a full clean may take several sessions. |
| Primary floors | ||
| Hard floors | GoodA self-cleaning roller mop with a 212°F station targets sealed hard floors, per Ecovacs. | GoodBuilt around hard floors: 21,000 Pa rated suction plus an ultrasonic sensor that separates hard floor from carpet. |
| Low / medium pilethey differ | DependsCarpet lift height for the roller has not been published for this model. | GoodTwin-capture separation and 21,000 Pa rated suction handle low-pile carpet; the brush bar is built to resist hair wrap. |
| High pile / shag | DependsNo carpet lift figure or carpet test exists before launch. | DependsThe 21,000 Pa figure is a peak Dyson claim with no independent high-pile test, so deep and shag pile performance is unverified. |
| Mopping needs | ||
| Vacuum only | GoodStrong vacuum; the mop lifts or detaches when not needed. | GoodVacuum-only robot — matches a vacuum-only need. |
| Light moppingthey differ | GoodActive mopping system covers routine floors easily. | PoorThis model has no mopping function. |
| Frequent moppingthey differ | GoodPressure or rotating mop with self-wash is built for frequent mopping. | PoorNo mop at all; choose a vacuum-and-mop robot instead. |
| Upkeep you accept | ||
| Regular upkeep | GoodAny robot vacuum suits an owner who accepts regular upkeep. | GoodAbout 25 minutes of upkeep a month. |
| Some upkeepthey differ | DependsUpkeep time a month is not verified. | GoodAbout 25 minutes of upkeep a month. |
| Minimal upkeepthey differ | DependsUpkeep time a month is not verified. | GoodAbout 25 minutes of upkeep a month, and the dock empties the bin. |
A robot being poor for a condition is a fact about fit, not a fault. “Depends” means the record names a limit worth reading, not that the answer is unknown.
A number only means something next to the spread it sits in. Each track is the real range across every classified robot in the class, with the median marked.
These robots share no measured specification with enough published figures to plot. That is a gap in the record, not a finding about the robots.
Written on each record, and the only thing here every robot on the site carries.
What each design gives up to be good at what it is good at.
A 40,000 Pa suction claim leads the announcement, while runtime, size and climbing ability are still unpublished.
At $549 the R1 keeps the R2’s LiDAR navigation and the same 21,000 Pa suction on the same chassis. What the lower price removes is wet cleaning, not sensing: the R2 adds mop hardware and a washing dock, and both robots map the same way.
Stated by the record itself. A robot being wrong for a household is a fact about fit, not a fault.
The upkeep ownership hands back to you, whatever the autonomy level says.
Classifications rest on different depths of evidence. A pre-release assessment and a verified one are not the same kind of claim.
| Robot | Evidence status | Sources reviewed | Last assessed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ecovacs Deebot T90S Pro Omni | Pre-Release | 4 | Sep 2026 |
| Dyson R1 Nurovi Dry | Provisional | 5 | Oct 2026 |
Evidence status counts the sources behind a classification, not their kind. A high count can be maker documentation and price coverage, so read it as how much was reviewed rather than as independent testing. How we weigh evidence.
The full recordEcovacs Deebot T90S Pro OmniSpecifications, evidence, the Fit Check in full, and every tracked change.
The full recordDyson R1 Nurovi DrySpecifications, evidence, the Fit Check in full, and every tracked change.Robovations classifies robots; it does not rank them. Nothing on this page is a recommendation, and no manufacturer influences a classification or its placement here.
Comparing across classes is allowed — the page will switch to per-class positioning and tell you it has.