Skip to content
Saved

ComparisonEcovacs Deebot T50 Max Pro Omni and iRobot Roomba Plus 678 Combo

Up to three

All robot vacuums. Every figure below is placed against the whole class, so a gap can be read against how much the class itself varies.

Where each one suits you.

The conditions each robot was assessed against, side by side. Rows marked in gold are where these machines genuinely differ.

Fit verdicts by condition for each robot
Condition Ecovacs Deebot T50 Ma… Roomba Plus 678 Combo
Home size
Under 1,500 sqft GoodT50 capable but exceeds typical needs for compact homes; smaller flagship variants offer same Level III mapping at lower cost. GoodRecharge-and-resume and retained LiDAR mapping comfortably cover a compact single-level home in one scheduled run.
1,500 – 3,000 GoodMulti-floor mapping retention and consolidated dock suit medium homes with distributed pet-shedding zones. GoodSystematic LiDAR mapping and recharge-and-resume are built for this range; typical single-level layouts complete in one scheduled run.
Over 3,000 DependsSingle dock limits multi-floor autonomous phasing; larger homes may need dock repositioning or longer scheduled cycles. DependsIndependent multi-level or large-home coverage testing does not yet exist for this model; recharge-and-resume adds passes rather than eliminating them.
Primary floors
Hard floors GoodBLAST system optimized for hard-floor loose pet hair. 18,500 Pa handles sealed floors effectively; mop pads improve low-pile particle removal. GoodThe PowerSpin roller and LiDAR navigation are built around hard-floor vacuum-plus-mop runs.
Low / medium pilethey differ DependsStandard Level III performance on low pile. BLAST advantage minimal on low-pile; main brush handles pile-to-base hair extraction normally. GoodThe roller auto-lifts on low-pile carpet detection; suction performance on carpet is not independently benchmarked.
High pile / shagthey differ PoorBLAST system targets surface loose hair, not embedded pile extraction. Owner reports show suction loss and main-brush strain on shag and high-pile formats. DependsNo independent suction or high-pile test results are documented for this model, and rated suction trails the Max-tier sibling.
Mopping needs
Vacuum only GoodStrong vacuum; the mop lifts or detaches when not needed. GoodStrong vacuum; the mop lifts or detaches when not needed.
Light mopping GoodActive mopping system covers routine floors easily. GoodActive mopping system covers routine floors easily.
Frequent mopping GoodPressure or rotating mop with self-wash is built for frequent mopping. GoodPressure or rotating mop with self-wash is built for frequent mopping.
You want to…
Empty bin myself GoodIntegrated dock reduces hands-on friction (auto-empty, mop-wash automation), but consumables still require weekly pad checks and monthly bag swaps. GoodThe dock automates roller washing and bin emptying, but a hands-on reader can still top off concentrate and run manual clean cycles.
Empty occasionally GoodDock automation handles dust and mop drying; owner rotates mop pads and swaps dust bags on documented schedule. Balanced autonomy-to-effort. GoodThe AutoWash dock's self-wash and self-empty cycles handle most routine upkeep between periodic concentrate refills and bag swaps.
Set-and-forgetthey differ PoorConsumable cycles and dock-level maintenance (water tank descaling, valve inspection) require monthly owner engagement. Not maintenance-free. DependsThe dock automates washing and emptying, but the concentrate reservoir and self-empty bag still need periodic manual refills, so it is not fully hands-off.

A robot being poor for a condition is a fact about fit, not a fault. “Depends” means the record names a limit worth reading, not that the answer is unknown.

Keep going.

Robovations classifies robots; it does not rank them. Nothing on this page is a recommendation, and no manufacturer influences a classification or its placement here.