
Dyson
Dyson 360 Heurist
- Autonomy
- IIIConditional
- Score
- 44/100Limited
- Readiness
- Not assessed
- Price
- Not tracked

Dyson

Roborock
Up to three
All robot vacuums. Every figure below is placed against the whole class, so a gap can be read against how much the class itself varies.
The conditions each robot was assessed against, side by side. Rows marked in gold are where these machines genuinely differ.
| Condition | Dyson 360 Heurist | Roborock Q7 L5 |
|---|---|---|
| Home size | ||
| Under 1,500 sqft | Good120 min runtime covers single-floor homes under 1,500 sqft; systematic camera-based mapping ensures no missed areas. | GoodVacuum Wars estimated about 1,465 sq ft per charge, enough for a home this size in one run. |
| 1,500 – 3,000they differ | Depends120 min runtime may require 2 sessions for 1,500-3,000 sqft; multi-floor scheduling via app required. | GoodRecharge and resume lets it finish larger homes after returning to its dock, per Vacuum Wars. |
| Over 3,000they differ | Poor120 min runtime insufficient for full-home coverage over 3,000 sqft in typical layouts. | DependsThe 400 ml bin has no auto-empty, so very large homes may fill it before the run ends. |
| Primary floors | ||
| Hard floors | GoodTrack drive provides stable traction on hard floors; no slip-out issues reported in owner forums. | GoodVacuum Wars found it collected debris of various sizes on hard floors with minimal scattering. |
| Low / medium pilethey differ | GoodCarpet transition handled by track drive; owner reports document reliable low-pile cleaning. | DependsVacuum Wars found it weaker on fine carpet debris, though it removed 80% of embedded sand. |
| High pile / shag | DependsSuction not documented in manufacturer specs; owner reports suggest adequate (not exceptional) high-pile cleaning. Tracks add weight for compression. | DependsNo high-pile test was found, and Vacuum Wars recorded weak pet hair pickup from carpet fibers. |
| Mopping needs | ||
| Vacuum only | GoodVacuum-only robot — matches a vacuum-only need. | GoodVacuums first; the mop pad is optional. |
| Light moppingthey differ | PoorThis model has no mopping function. | GoodFlat mop pad handles light, routine wiping of hard floors. |
| Frequent moppingthey differ | PoorNo mop at all; choose a vacuum-and-mop robot instead. | DependsA dragged pad freshens floors but lacks the pressure or scrubbing for heavy, frequent mopping. |
| You want to… | ||
| Empty bin myself | GoodNo self-empty dock or auto-wash; manual bin emptying and brush cleaning every 1-2 weeks. Track maintenance adds complexity. | GoodOwners who empty bins and detangle brushes will manage its fully manual upkeep. |
| Empty occasionallythey differ | GoodWeekly brush and track inspection; monthly filter change. Track-specific wear requires occasional deep clean. | DependsEvery run needs the 400 ml bin emptied by hand, and long hair tangles the brush. |
| Set-and-forget | PoorManual emptying required after each session; track drive requires more maintenance than wheel-based robots. No auto-features available. | PoorNo auto-empty dock, no mop lift and heavy hair tangling mean it cannot run for days unattended. |
A robot being poor for a condition is a fact about fit, not a fault. “Depends” means the record names a limit worth reading, not that the answer is unknown.
Nine inputs across three pillars, each weighted as shown and each scored so more is better. A robot can lead on one and trail on another, which is the point of showing them apart.
A number only means something next to the spread it sits in. Each track is the real range across every classified robot in the class, with the median marked.
Not compared, because fewer than two of these robots carry a published figure: Price, Suction, Runtime, Charge time, Noise.
Written on each record, and the only thing here every robot on the site carries.
What each design gives up to be good at what it is good at.
Discontinued since 2021: repairs and parts are unavailable through official channels, so tracked-drive hardware with genuine climbing ability now depends on secondhand sourcing.
The 360-degree camera system reads rooms comparably to LiDAR in bright light, but owners report it struggles in very dark rooms, where the fisheye camera has nothing to work from.
Track-drive traction climbs steps and pushes through thick-pile carpet, yet Dyson never published an obstacle-height rating, so the actual limit of what the tracks clear is undocumented.
The 330 mL bin runs out fast: reviewers describe it ‘full of grey filth’ after one carpet pass, though auto-resume lets an unfinished job pick back up on its own.
Measured suction runs about twice Vacuum Wars’ category average, yet flattened pet hair pickup was the lowest it has recorded.
Three water-flow levels, one outcome in testing: floors left overly wet.
Stated by the record itself. A robot being wrong for a household is a fact about fit, not a fault.
The upkeep ownership hands back to you, whatever the autonomy level says.
Classifications rest on different depths of evidence. A pre-release assessment and a verified one are not the same kind of claim.
| Robot | Evidence status | Sources reviewed | Last assessed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dyson 360 Heurist | Discontinued | 2 | Aug 2026 |
| Roborock Q7 L5 | Pending | 2 | Sep 2026 |
Evidence status counts the sources behind a classification, not their kind. A high count can be maker documentation and price coverage, so read it as how much was reviewed rather than as independent testing. How we weigh evidence.
The full recordDyson 360 HeuristSpecifications, evidence, the Fit Check in full, and every tracked change.
The full recordRoborock Q7 L5Specifications, evidence, the Fit Check in full, and every tracked change.Robovations classifies robots; it does not rank them. Nothing on this page is a recommendation, and no manufacturer influences a classification or its placement here.
Comparing across classes is allowed — the page will switch to per-class positioning and tell you it has.