
Dyson
Dyson 360 Heurist
- Autonomy
- IIIConditional
- Score
- 44/100Limited
- Readiness
- Not assessed
- Price
- Not tracked

Dyson
Up to three
All robot vacuums. Every figure below is placed against the whole class, so a gap can be read against how much the class itself varies.
The conditions each robot was assessed against, side by side. Rows marked in gold are where these machines genuinely differ.
| Condition | Dyson 360 Heurist |
|---|---|
| Home size | |
| Under 1,500 sqft | Good120 min runtime covers single-floor homes under 1,500 sqft; systematic camera-based mapping ensures no missed areas. |
| 1,500 – 3,000 | Depends120 min runtime may require 2 sessions for 1,500-3,000 sqft; multi-floor scheduling via app required. |
| Over 3,000 | Poor120 min runtime insufficient for full-home coverage over 3,000 sqft in typical layouts. |
| Primary floors | |
| Hard floors | GoodTrack drive provides stable traction on hard floors; no slip-out issues reported in owner forums. |
| Low / medium pile | GoodCarpet transition handled by track drive; owner reports document reliable low-pile cleaning. |
| High pile / shag | DependsSuction not documented in manufacturer specs; owner reports suggest adequate (not exceptional) high-pile cleaning. Tracks add weight for compression. |
| Mopping needs | |
| Vacuum only | GoodVacuum-only robot — matches a vacuum-only need. |
| Light mopping | PoorThis model has no mopping function. |
| Frequent mopping | PoorNo mop at all; choose a vacuum-and-mop robot instead. |
| You want to… | |
| Empty bin myself | GoodNo self-empty dock or auto-wash; manual bin emptying and brush cleaning every 1-2 weeks. Track maintenance adds complexity. |
| Empty occasionally | GoodWeekly brush and track inspection; monthly filter change. Track-specific wear requires occasional deep clean. |
| Set-and-forget | PoorManual emptying required after each session; track drive requires more maintenance than wheel-based robots. No auto-features available. |
A robot being poor for a condition is a fact about fit, not a fault. “Depends” means the record names a limit worth reading, not that the answer is unknown.
Nine inputs across three pillars, each weighted as shown and each scored so more is better. A robot can lead on one and trail on another, which is the point of showing them apart.
A number only means something next to the spread it sits in. Each track is the real range across every classified robot in the class, with the median marked.
These robots share no measured specification with enough published figures to plot. That is a gap in the record, not a finding about the robots.
Written on each record, and the only thing here every robot on the site carries.
What each design gives up to be good at what it is good at.
Discontinued since 2021: repairs and parts are unavailable through official channels, so tracked-drive hardware with genuine climbing ability now depends on secondhand sourcing.
The 360-degree camera system reads rooms comparably to LiDAR in bright light, but owners report it struggles in very dark rooms, where the fisheye camera has nothing to work from.
Track-drive traction climbs steps and pushes through thick-pile carpet, yet Dyson never published an obstacle-height rating, so the actual limit of what the tracks clear is undocumented.
The 330 mL bin runs out fast: reviewers describe it ‘full of grey filth’ after one carpet pass, though auto-resume lets an unfinished job pick back up on its own.
Stated by the record itself. A robot being wrong for a household is a fact about fit, not a fault.
The upkeep ownership hands back to you, whatever the autonomy level says.
Classifications rest on different depths of evidence. A pre-release assessment and a verified one are not the same kind of claim.
| Robot | Evidence status | Sources reviewed | Last assessed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dyson 360 Heurist | Discontinued | 2 | Aug 2026 |
Evidence status counts the sources behind a classification, not their kind. A high count can be maker documentation and price coverage, so read it as how much was reviewed rather than as independent testing. How we weigh evidence.
Robovations classifies robots; it does not rank them. Nothing on this page is a recommendation, and no manufacturer influences a classification or its placement here.
Comparing across classes is allowed — the page will switch to per-class positioning and tell you it has.