
Degrii
Degrii Zima Pro
- Autonomy
- IIIConditional
- Score
- Not scored
- Readiness
- Not assessed
- Price
- Not tracked

Degrii

MOVA
Up to three
All robot pool cleaners. Every figure below is placed against the whole class, so a gap can be read against how much the class itself varies.
The conditions each robot was assessed against, side by side. Rows marked in gold are where these machines genuinely differ.
| Condition | Degrii Zima Pro | MOVA Rover X10 |
|---|---|---|
| Pool type | ||
| In-ground | GoodManufacturer rates depth from 2 ft to 11 ft and coverage to 5,000 sq ft, well inside typical in-ground dimensions. | GoodAll four tests ran in in-ground pools, including one review's 8 x 4 m pool, with strong floor results. |
| Above-ground | DependsNo above-ground-specific validation was found; the tethered floating battery pack remains an added component to manage regardless of pool type. | DependsMOVA lists all pool types, but no test covered an above-ground pool, and it weighs 15.8 kg. |
| Mixed setupthey differ | GoodThe 2 to 11 ft depth range and 5,000 sq ft rating apply to both installation types. | DependsA mixed setup needs both pool types confirmed, and above-ground use has not been independently tested. |
| Pool size | ||
| Small (< 400 sqft) | GoodRated to 5,000 sq ft with a 210-minute floor cycle; a small pool leaves most of that capacity unused. | GoodIt cleans small pools easily, though a hands-on review judged its size and price oversized for a garden pool. |
| Medium (400 – 800) | GoodA 210-minute floor-mode runtime and 5,000 sq ft rated coverage clear a medium pool well within a single cycle. | GoodOne review's 8 x 4 m pool was cleaned systematically, with leaves, sand and soil reliably picked up. |
| Large (> 800) | GoodManufacturer coverage rating of 5,000 sq ft comfortably spans large pools within the 210-minute floor or overall cycle. | GoodMOVA rates it for 500 m², and independent testing found runtime only slightly below the six-hour claim. |
| Debris load | ||
| Fine (sand / silt) | GoodThe interchangeable 100-micron ultra-fine basket is built for sand and silt, separate from the coarser 180-micron option. | GoodAn included 3 micron filter caught pollen and fine dirt in independent testing, though it clogs faster. |
| Leaves / large debris | GoodThe 180-micron basket handles coarser leaf and large debris loads, distinct from the fine 100-micron insert. | GoodIts 5 L basket and surface skimming collected leaves reliably in two independent tests. |
| Algae / heavy fouling | DependsNo independent test of cleaning performance against algae was located; only manufacturer and sponsored coverage describe this robot. | DependsIndependent testing found light waterline deposits cleaned but old, stuck rims not removed; no algae test was run. |
| Coverage you want | ||
| Floor only | GoodFloor mode alone runs up to 210 minutes, the longest of the four selectable cleaning modes. | GoodOne review found little left on the floor, and another saw systematic, thorough floor cleaning. |
| Floor + walls | GoodA dedicated wall mode runs up to 150 minutes, cleaning walls separately from the floor-only pass. | GoodHands-on reviews found it climbs walls reliably with good adhesion. |
| Floor + walls + waterline | GoodOverall mode covers floor, wall and waterline in one cycle, plus an app command to climb toward the line. | GoodHands-on reviews found waterline cleaning powerful, with the robot staying active at the top. |
A robot being poor for a condition is a fact about fit, not a fault. “Depends” means the record names a limit worth reading, not that the answer is unknown.
A number only means something next to the spread it sits in. Each track is the real range across every classified robot in the class, with the median marked.
Not compared, because fewer than two of these robots carry a published figure: Price, Charge time, Noise, Weight.
Written on each record, and the only thing here every robot on the site carries.
What each design gives up to be good at what it is good at.
A 360-degree, 20-plus-sensor radar array and a 250W triple-motor pump are a more elaborate design than the Zima Lite’s, but the main unit’s dependence on a tethered floating battery pack is a real added component to manage that the Lite does not have.
A one-click ‘climb to waterline’ command reduces how far a person has to reach to retrieve the unit, but does not remove the retrieval task entirely.
Laser mapping drives systematic lanes, while a hands-on review found mapping less accurate in cloudy water.
The AquaSonar buoy adds underwater app control, and it needs its own charging, with a hands-on review finding the link unstable.
Stated by the record itself. A robot being wrong for a household is a fact about fit, not a fault.
The upkeep ownership hands back to you, whatever the autonomy level says.
Classifications rest on different depths of evidence. A pre-release assessment and a verified one are not the same kind of claim.
| Robot | Evidence status | Sources reviewed | Last assessed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Degrii Zima Pro | Provisional | 8 | Aug 2026 |
| MOVA Rover X10 | Verified | 12 | Sep 2026 |
Evidence status counts the sources behind a classification, not their kind. A high count can be maker documentation and price coverage, so read it as how much was reviewed rather than as independent testing. How we weigh evidence.
The full recordDegrii Zima ProSpecifications, evidence, the Fit Check in full, and every tracked change.
The full recordMOVA Rover X10Specifications, evidence, the Fit Check in full, and every tracked change.Robovations classifies robots; it does not rank them. Nothing on this page is a recommendation, and no manufacturer influences a classification or its placement here.
Comparing across classes is allowed — the page will switch to per-class positioning and tell you it has.