
Degrii
Degrii Zima Lite
- Autonomy
- IIIConditional
- Score
- Not scored
- Readiness
- Not assessed
- Price
- $699list

Degrii

Wybot
Up to three
All robot pool cleaners. Every figure below is placed against the whole class, so a gap can be read against how much the class itself varies.
The conditions each robot was assessed against, side by side. Rows marked in gold are where these machines genuinely differ.
| Condition | Degrii Zima Lite | Wybot C2 Vision |
|---|---|---|
| Pool type | ||
| In-groundthey differ | DependsMaximum obstacle clearance is 3.9 in; in-ground drains, ladders or fittings taller than that can stop it. | GoodDesigned for inground pool wall geometry and climbing capability; standard use case. |
| Above-groundthey differ | GoodNo above-ground-specific validation was found; the same 3.9 in obstacle-clearance limit that concerns in-ground drains applies here too. | PoorAbove-ground pool walls and entry angles differ materially; manufacturer specifies inground pools only. |
| Mixed setupthey differ | GoodDual-radar 3D path planning for floor, wall and waterline coverage is not restricted to either installation type in the specs. | DependsInground pools recommended; test before purchase on above-ground pools for wall-climbing mechanical fit. |
| Pool size | ||
| Small (< 400 sqft) | GoodEven the more conservative 1,614 sq ft manufacturer figure is well beyond what a small pool needs to clean each cycle. | GoodUnder 5,000 gallons (approximately 800 sq ft) cleaned in single 90-minute eco-mode session. |
| Medium (400 – 800) | GoodA medium pool sits safely under both the 1,614 sq ft EU figure and the 3,800 sq ft US figure Degrii publishes. | Good12,000-25,000 gallons (approximately 2,000 sq ft) cleaned in single 180-minute eco-mode session; full coverage per cycle. |
| Large (> 800) | DependsDegrii's own EU and US listings disagree on maximum coverage (1,614 vs 3,800 sq ft); confirm against the larger pool before buying. | DependsOver 2,150 sq ft requires split sessions with recharge between runs; operational overhead burden on true large pools. |
| Debris load | ||
| Fine (sand / silt) | GoodBoth filter baskets are rated at 180 microns, with no finer mesh option documented for capturing very fine silt. | GoodDual-layer 10-micron ultra-fine filtration excels at sediment capture; straightforward weekly cartridge rinse. |
| Leaves / large debris | GoodDual 180-micron filters with 6.5 L combined capacity are sized for leaf and larger debris loads. | GoodEight-mode targeting (Waterline Only, Dirt Hunting) addresses leaf accumulation; 3,592 GPH suction handles bulk debris. |
| Algae / heavy fouling | DependsNo independent test of cleaning performance against algae was located; available coverage largely restates manufacturer specifications. | DependsCamera navigation loses precision in green or very cloudy water; manual mode selection required. Separate algae treatment needed independently. |
| Coverage you want | ||
| Floor only | GoodFloor mode is one of five selectable modes, running independently of the wall and waterline passes. | GoodFloor mode cleans pool bottom thoroughly; wall-tracking during standard modes adds cross-pool surface coverage. |
| Floor + walls | GoodA dedicated Wall mode cleans walls separately from Floor mode, among the five selectable cleaning modes. | GoodDedicated wall-climbing and waterline modes; eight-mode menu supports floor-and-walls sequencing. |
| Floor + walls + waterline | GoodOverall mode covers floor, walls and waterline together in one cycle, driven by the dual-radar 3D path planning. | GoodWaterline-only, wall-only, and waterline-then-floor modes directly address algae-prone waterline; covers all three zones. |
A robot being poor for a condition is a fact about fit, not a fault. “Depends” means the record names a limit worth reading, not that the answer is unknown.
A number only means something next to the spread it sits in. Each track is the real range across every classified robot in the class, with the median marked.
Not compared, because fewer than two of these robots carry a published figure: Charge time, Noise, Height.
Written on each record, and the only thing here every robot on the site carries.
What each design gives up to be good at what it is good at.
Dual-ultrasonic-radar 3D path planning across floor, walls and waterline is a real capability by manufacturer design, but Degrii’s own regional listings disagree on how large a pool that planning actually covers, and this research could not reconcile the two figures.
Auto-parking at the nearest wall reduces how far a robot has to be fished from open water, but it still requires manual lifting rather than a full self-exit, so the retrieval task is reduced, not eliminated.
AI camera guidance loses precision in murky water; algae-heavy conditions force manual mode switching to maintain full-pool coverage.
180-minute runtime per charge caps true large-pool coverage to split sessions, adding operational overhead compared to continuous tethered cleaners.
Stated by the record itself. A robot being wrong for a household is a fact about fit, not a fault.
The upkeep ownership hands back to you, whatever the autonomy level says.
Classifications rest on different depths of evidence. A pre-release assessment and a verified one are not the same kind of claim.
| Robot | Evidence status | Sources reviewed | Last assessed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Degrii Zima Lite | Pending | 5 | Aug 2026 |
| Wybot C2 Vision | Provisional | 3 | Aug 2026 |
Evidence status counts the sources behind a classification, not their kind. A high count can be maker documentation and price coverage, so read it as how much was reviewed rather than as independent testing. How we weigh evidence.
The full recordDegrii Zima LiteSpecifications, evidence, the Fit Check in full, and every tracked change.
The full recordWybot C2 VisionSpecifications, evidence, the Fit Check in full, and every tracked change.
Written comparisonRobot pool cleaners: what does $500 more actually buy?We have examined this pairing in full, with a stated finding.Robovations classifies robots; it does not rank them. Nothing on this page is a recommendation, and no manufacturer influences a classification or its placement here.
Comparing across classes is allowed — the page will switch to per-class positioning and tell you it has.